anonymous_abc
Member
Supply and demand, how does that work?
Yea, how could the EU possibly survive without all those RR engines and Evoques?
Supply and demand, how does that work?
Yea, how could the EU possibly survive without all those RR engines and Evoques?
Yea, how could the EU possibly survive without all those RR engines and Evoques?
Most importantly..how can EU survive without those delicious british cakes?
This isn't going to be flashy reaction at least until. Jobs just won't be created, investment won't happen or be quietly shelved. As most of the indicators lags, it'll have already largely happened by the time we find out about it.
This isn't going to be flashy reaction at least until a50 is invoked. Jobs just won't be created, investment won't happen or be quietly shelved. As most of the indicators lags, it'll have already largely happened by the time we find out about it.
This is why I don't understand why delaying to trigger Article 50 for next year is a good thing for anybody involved.
This is why I don't understand why delaying to trigger Article 50 for next year is a good thing for anybody involved.
Because it's the point of no return. If there's any chance of finding a way out of this then Art 50 should continue to be delayed. Delaying hurts, but it's nothing compared to actually triggering it.This is why I don't understand why delaying to trigger Article 50 for next year is a good thing for anybody involved.
This is why I don't understand why delaying to trigger Article 50 for next year is a good thing for anybody involved.
is that why Corbyn is cosying up to Cuba? He wants to know their automobile maintenance secrets in case he has to keep his car another 40 years
This is why I don't understand why delaying to trigger Article 50 for next year is a good thing for anybody involved.
Credit Suisse have been doing some polling of major businesses in the wake of Brexit. Not pretty reading at all
This isn't going to be flashy reaction at least until a50 is invoked. Jobs just won't be created, investment won't happen or be quietly shelved. As most of the indicators lags, it'll have already largely happened by the time we find out about it.
Triggering Art. 50 basically hands all the power to the EU. Of course we're not doing it any time soon.
UK car factories face uncertain future
Plants run by Nissan, Honda and Toyota are most at risk of closure after Brexit.
https://next.ft.com/content/27d7b066-447c-11e6-b22f-79eb4891c97d
Ironically, production for both cars would be moved to... Poland.
Ucchedavāda;209836831 said:
Vauxhall is done. It will take an act of God to keep the Astra there. Toyota UK may also lose the Auris.
Ironically, production for both cars would be moved to... Poland.
Nissan not done too?
Vauxhall is done. It will take an act of God to keep the Astra there. Toyota UK may also lose the Auris.
Ironically, production for both cars would be moved to... Poland.
[BBC] Wetherspoon's boss decries Brexit 'doom-mongering' - Leavers already getting their excuses ready (he was one of the few 'business leaders' pro-Brexit), apparently the "unprecedented and irresponsible doom-mongering... may lead to some kind of slowdown". One hell of a placebo effect.
Still remember laughing as I walked passed one of his pubs last month with signs reading "Brexit - only Wetherspoon can gather the facts for you".
Nissan UK is relatively safe for now since Sunderland's output is huge and manufactures a lot of different models. They may take some cuts, but damage will be done over time.Nissan not done too?
Isn't it well documented that talking the economy down in the media basically causes, or at least exacerbates, a downturn in the economy? If you keep telling people that trouble is ahead, of course they'll stop spending. And then that causes more problems.
We should have giant telescreens showing that Farage "things are looking pretty good" clip over and over!
I mean, remember the Northern Rock thing? The news media basically caused a run on the bank. Charlie Brooker did a good piece on it where they're interviewing people in queues asking "Where do you think all this panic is coming from?". From you, you twats!
Presumably because starting a process which will require not only intense exit discussions, but also significant local work in terms of things like ratifying replacement legislation for presently EU-enforced laws, is a bad idea before you have actually had a chance to get people in place and they've had a chance to prepare for the incoming typhoon of work, particularly when a lot of that work has a hard two-year deadline.
Our current government and civil service set-up is woefully unprepared for what is about to be dumped in them.
There's not much choice by all accounts, can't go into negotiations with no fucking clue what needs sorting out.
Because it's the point of no return. If there's any chance of finding a way out of this then Art 50 should continue to be delayed. Delaying hurts, but it's nothing compared to actually triggering it.
Edit: I guess the answer above mine are more realistic. Maybe I'm still being too optimistic.
You don't just declare war, Jeremy. You prime the press, you square things with the UN, you make up your reasons.
Triggering Art. 50 basically hands all the power to the EU. Of course we're not doing it any time soon.
I know the reasons, but I don't understand the solution. It's not like these issues will be fixed starting with 1st of January, unless you import qualified personnel, because training it will take much longer than 1 year.
There is no return at this point.
You already declared war you're just postponing the fight while you don't have factories prepared for war production or capable training programs for the army.
I thought you wanted out of EU. Now you want still a bit in?
You already declared war you're just postponing the fight while you don't have factories prepared for war production or capable training programs for the army.
Tbh I imagine that Wetherspoons would do very well out of people having less money! They're the cheapest pubs around for people to drown their sorrows in.
Really not sure what's so complicated - even if you're a dyed in the wool Leaver, 730 days is a pathetically short amount of time to navigate a highly complex, vague, and unprecedented process.
We aimed for Churchill and ended up with Stalin.
So how long do you estimate it takes to trigger Article 50? I'm curious how much the British Economy can sunk even before starting the process.
We aimed for Churchill and ended up with Stalin.
In other news today Sturgeon met today with Picardo to discuss how they can work together to stay in EU. Can Gibraltar unite with Scotland? That would be funny and more gas on the Spanish fire.
This is why I don't understand why delaying to trigger Article 50 for next year is a good thing for anybody involved.
...
So how long do you estimate it takes to trigger Article 50? I'm curious how much the British Economy can sunk even before starting the process.
...
It took the leave campaigners (UKIP) 23 years to come up with no plan at all as what to do after deciding to leave the EU. You can't rush these things, I estimate it will take around 75 to 100 years until article 50 will be triggered.
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 36% (+1)
LAB: 35% (+1)
LDEM: 11% (+2)
UKIP: 8% (-2)
GRN: 4% (-)
(via Ipsos Mori / 09 - 11 Jul)
I'm hoping Art.50 never gets triggered until I finish a masters so I can GTFO of here.
More like ending up with Mussolini.
God, this situation can't be reversed can it? Our only hope is a Norway deal, with continued access to the single market but a lot of our country apparently hates immigrants too much to care about the economy.
That 42% "Don't Know" for Tim Farron.
Lib Dems cannot into relevance.
Don't be a bell.
I didn't vote out, but you don't have to be a right winger to know the word "capacity"
I didn't vote out, but you don't have to be a right winger to know the word "capacity"