No leave supporters in this thread? I'm confused.
Scotland made it very clear that they will only stay if the rest of the United Kingdom voted to remain within the EU. As that did not happen, she has made it very clear that Scotland will be part of the European Union, with or without the UK. Her responsibilty as the scottish prime minister is first and foremost aimed at the scottish people. If England wants to jump ship towards insanity, they shouldn't expect Scotland to be as crazy.
No leave supporters in this thread? I'm confused.
So back from my ban, I have not see any other leave voters in this thread for a while, but will have to post carefully as don't want another ban
Few things to catch up....
kicked off in my area and I expected it as my whole area overwhelmingly voted to leave, and TBH if I was a immigrant I would not stay in Norfolk/Lincolnshire (well Norwich looks ok)
Labour held a vigil to show support for immigrants, lots of low level racism,my sons school have held 2 emergency assemblies to try to stop the bulling of EAL
A school in Ely wrote a public letter warning parents they were on the verge of calling police, a shop (Romanian) was fire bombed in Norwich
The biggest thing was our local head councillor blocked the Government putting 50 Syrian families in our area, and instead said Norwich would have to take them (The official answer was the climate was not 'ok' for them here)
I see David Davis open letter about how we block free movement and access the single market has been derided on here, so no point going over that...
I'm pretty sure the question posed to the Scottish people made no mention of the EU.
In Twitter, Louise Mensch sought out a mother of a child waiting for an operation, who had been celebrating Hunt's apparent dismissal, to call her a "loathsome tit."
In Twitter, Louise Mensch sought out a mother of a child waiting for an operation, who had been celebrating Hunt's apparent dismissal, to call her a "loathsome tit."
The relatively unknown investment fund where Theresa Mays husband Philip works as a senior executive is one of the worlds largest and most powerful financial institutions, controlling $1.4 trillion in assets.
Its portfolio also includes $20 billion of shares in Amazon and Starbucks, both of which were cited by the Prime Minister-designate in her pledge to crack down on tax avoidance yesterday.
Latest filings to US authorities show that Los Angeles based Capital Group owns huge stakes in a variety of companies, including investment bank JP Morgan Chase, defence giant Lockheed Martin, tobacco company Philip Morris International, the pharmaceutical sectors Merck & Co, and also Ryanair.
She said: We need to talk about tax. It doesnt matter to me whether youre Amazon, Google or Starbucks: you have a duty to put something back, you have a debt to your fellow citizens, you have a responsibility to pay your taxes. So as Prime Minister, I will crack down on individual and corporate tax avoidance and evasion.
Welcome back. Genuine question - has your opinion of Brexit changed at all with all that has transpired in the past few weeks? Are you still pro-leave? You don't necessarily have to explain yourself if you are, I'm just curious if all of the broken leave promises, political turmoil and rise in overt racism has altered your view at all?
I just saw (and I think it was a father? Had a male name) and plenty of tweets defending what she said and what I think is complaining over the bullying to Leadsom.
She sounds vile just from the last hour of her tweets...
What a disgusting woman. How can you insult someone who's child has had an operation and is sick purely because he reported what he saw in a hospital?
I know quite a few people working in different hospitals over the country and overwhelmingly people seem (anecdotally of course) to hate Jeremy Hunt.
From her tweets, as far as she is concerned, the Junior Doctors are selfish and she is glad Hunt is back and doing what he does.
:/
The EU referendum question made no mention of immigrants, so I guess it wasn't about that then.
@jon_bartley
Im on a hospital ward with my son, awaiting a delayed and postponed operation. Huge cheer just erupted at news Jeremy Hunt has been sacked.
@LouiseMensch
Well scumbag enjoy the fact you were wrong you loathsome tit. Jeremy is staying https://twitter.com/jon_bartley/status/753553397203296257
I just saw (and I think it was a father? Had a male name) and plenty of tweets defending what she said and what I think is complaining over the bullying to Leadsom.
She sounds vile just from the last hour of her tweets...
Nice straw man argument there.
There must be something in the water. A senior Toyota UK executive said right after the referendum that they were scared shitless of Brexit because they never thought it could become a thing and thus never planned for it.FWIW, given that this was an actual possiblity, devised years in the making. Even if somewhat theoretical and unlikely at certain points, I find the fact that the British Civil Service (as well as political leaders) were so unprepared rather flabbergasting. Almost beyond comprehension.
There must be something in the water. A senior Toyota UK executive said that they were scared shitless of Brexit because they never thought it could become a thing and thus never planned for it.
It's almost as if the EU was the only one with a plan B.
The government made clear nothing has been done as no PM wanted it.
It's like nobody listens anymore to experts and the political elite.
The government made clear nothing has been done as no PM wanted it.
It's like nobody listens anymore to experts and the political elite.
Just screwed themselves, the "elites" don't need benefits and are highly mobile. So congrats working class English you're the author of your own book of death again.That's exactly why a lot of people voted leave- the elites and experts said that Remain was the best option. I get the feeling they wanted to 'screw over the establishment'.
Well if you don't like rhetorical devices being flung in your face, stop making simple statements ignoring context.
Yes the Scottish Referendum question did not mention the EU, it was a major campaign point on both sides. With Better Together clearly stating consistently the only way to stay in the EU was to vote no.
Similarly people and politicians are only able to say that freedom of movement is off the table due immigration predominance in the EU ref campaign.
The empirical evidence post ref suggests that most leave voters are now less concerned about immigration and more concerned about the economy and sovereignty. Although frankly I think they're just saying that make themselves feel better.
Yes we can and indeed we do. Why are you idiots so determined to drag us down with you? Go live in your little right wing paradise and everyone else will live in this century not Victorian times.You can't say that "Scotland made it very clear that they will only stay if the rest of the United Kingdom voted to remain within the EU." That's not what was voted on. Making statements and proclaiming them as fact, and then complaining when you get called out on it is hilarious.
I stated a fact totally relevant to the post I was replying to. The literal opposite of a straw man. Nice reply with a picture though, marvelous form of debate.
what are you, some kind of expert in listening habits?
No, thanks. No more experts.
Pretty much.Just screwed themselves, the "elites" don't need benefits and are highly mobile. So congrats working class English you're the author of your own book of death again.
You can't say that "Scotland made it very clear that they will only stay if the rest of the United Kingdom voted to remain within the EU." That's not what was voted on. Making statements and proclaiming them as fact, and then complaining when you get called out on it is hilarious.
I stated a fact totally relevant to the post I was replying to. The literal opposite of a straw man. Nice reply with a picture though, marvelous form of debate.
And that the snp manifesto included specific mention of a material change triggering a indy ref and Sturgeon repeatedly said leaving the eu if we voted to stay represented such a change.That wasn't me you were replying to. I made no such statement. I do think it's pretty silly not acknowledge that the EU membership was a major component of the Scottish Independence referendum campaign on both sides.
But the circumstances of the 2014 referendum have changed completely, why do you want to keep the Scottish people part of the Union against their will? Or deny them even the chance to express their will in a referendum?You can't say that "Scotland made it very clear that they will only stay if the rest of the United Kingdom voted to remain within the EU." That's not what was voted on. Making statements and proclaiming them as fact, and then complaining when you get called out on it is hilarious.
Yes we can and indeed we do. Why are you idiots so determined to drag us down with you? Go live in your little right wing paradise and everyone else will live in this century not Victorian times.
I'm pretty sure the question posed to the Scottish people made no mention of the EU.
That wasn't me you were replying to. I made no such statement. Although given the guy is called kmax I can see why you'd get confused
I do think it's pretty silly not acknowledge that the EU membership was a major component of the Scottish Independence referendum campaign on both sides and there's plenty up in Scotland who are rightly pissed off especially on the back of the other broken promises by the ex-prime minister.
That's nice you want to deny us our own democratic will. Don't expect me to respect you in return, you deserve ire.It's impossible to have any sort of opposing view in this thread. I'm not an idiot and I'm certainly not right wing. I'd prefer Scotland to remain in the union but you being aggressive and sanctimonious doesn't shock me to be honest.
Saw a random comment on Facebook that sums up Louise Mensch: 'She's Katie Hopkins for people with a smoothie maker.'
Odious, vile woman.
You can't say that "Scotland made it very clear that they will only stay if the rest of the United Kingdom voted to remain within the EU." That's not what was voted on. Making statements and proclaiming them as fact, and then complaining when you get called out on it is hilarious.
The Scottish First Minister said another independence referendum "is definitely on the table" if Scotland votes to remain in the UK but the rest of the UK votes to leave.
That's nice you want to deny us our own democratic will. Don't expect me to respect you in return, you deserve ire.
That's a weird statement considering that I have yet to respond.
To answer, no, that was not what was being voted on, but to imply that they didn't signal their intentions if brexit were to go ahead is false.
Why are you putting words in my mouth? Where did I say Scotland shouldn't have a second referendum? All I said was the EU wasn't part of the question posed in the original referendum.
Why are you putting words in my mouth? Where did I say Scotland shouldn't have a second referendum? All I said was the EU wasn't part of the question posed in the original referendum.
This article is really crap journalism (which seems very common from the Indie since it became a chumbucket internet-only 'newspaper').
May's husband is a client relationship manager. He doesn't control any investments.
The article implies he's some corrupt piece of shit simply when actually he just works for a bank.
And like most investment banks, they hold shares in big multinational companies.
I'm not a fan of Amazon, Starbucks and Google's tax-dodging, but it's ridiculous to smear someone as a bad person for working for a company that holds shares in them.
Surely it follows that people who actually buy stuff from Amazon/Starbucks and use google/chrome/android phones are even more evil. But I guess everyone at the Independent uses local high-street independent shops and Apple computers/phones.
Now I feel dirty for (indirectly) defending Theresa May.