D
Deleted member 231381
Unconfirmed Member
You call that a trade deal?
This (*snickt*) is a trade deal.
This (*snickt*) is a trade deal.
That only makes it worse doesn't it? They could list as many as they like, yet almost 80% think (or pretend to think) that the EU isn't worth mentioning.Worth noting that a person could put as many "highest priority" countries as they want. That doesn't mean Australia is the highest priority. And it's also fairly obvious to me that trade deals are intended to increase the amount of trade you do with a country, so that value currently being low isn't inherently a problem.
* the UK whips out a spoon *You call that a trade deal?
This (*snickt*) is a trade deal.
Let's hope Corbyn actually pays attention.
Corbyn probably thinks the highest priority is a trade deal with Cuba.
@YouGov 47% of Leave voters think a trade deal with Australia is the highest priority - just 23% EU
From the second comment (tweet):
¯_(ツ_/¯
I get the sense that size on a map is a significant factor in people overvaluing trade relations with Australia and Canada.
Car manufacturers shifting research roles to Eastern Europe post Brexit.
https://www.theguardian.com/busines...rch-roles-to-eastern-europe-after-brexit-vote
Meh. This is a trend the industry has been following for years - farming out R&D to Eastern Europe and Asian countries with cheap labour, like Vietnam. Nothing to do with Brexit.
Moving back-office work, finance and help-desk towards Eastern Europe is just part of the current trend. Design, software (specially if we are talking about the finer stuff) and procurement, however, is something rather unusual.Car firms are searching for senior product and component designers, procurement officers, software developers and back-office roles in human resources, finance and help-desk positions.
I get the sense that size on a map is a significant factor in people overvaluing trade relations with Australia and Canada.
This is not true.
R&D in the automotive industry (particularly design and engineering) has always been concentrated around France, the UK and Germany, with very little relocation. Production is a whole different thing.
I've worked in automotive R&D for years. It has.
UK R&D is trending towards being "managed" in the UK (i.e. fuck ups corrected) but the bulk of the design, test, CAD-jockey work has shifted to cheap labour countries. It makes sense - UK contractor rates are some of the highest globally.
Tier 1 supplier R&D, more than OEM R&D, are moving Eastwards to Romania etc.
I get the sense that size on a map is a significant factor in people overvaluing trade relations with Australia and Canada.
The biggest factor is "Commonwealth". My mum's Brexiteering friends seem to think we can somehow replace the EU with the Commonwealth and everything will be fine because "they are ruled by our Queen" and therefore we can dictate the terms of trade and effectively help ourselves to their resources.
Brexit and trade agreements discussions in two short tweets:
Edit: the discussions carries on here, if you like to kill some brain cells.
I'm quite surprised that a party who frequently argues against commonly held scientific facts has an MP who says that.
Well, he certainly can't explain how tides work.Brexit and trade agreements discussions in two short tweets:
Edit: the discussions carries on here, if you like to kill some brain cells.
Fucking fuck hole, I'm going to Vegas in a month and a half. I mean, obviously I'll win thousands at the Craps table, but I'll also eat thousands of dollars worth of Chilis and I want a decent exchange rate!
You might get 'lucky' it's going to bounce around within the 1.28 to 1.33 mark (depending on the news that week)for the next while but the general direction over the next year or so will be down unless there's an unexpected rate rise.
Brexit and trade agreements discussions in two short tweets:
Edit: the discussions carries on here, if you like to kill some brain cells.
Still two of the world's largest economies:
Canada is #10
I don't think it's that much of an overvaluation, Canada and Australia punch above their population economically. Granted, while, Australia and Canada are #1 and #2 on this list is an overvaluation as you said, they're guaranteed to be happy to hammer out a trade deal with the UK. Should be far easier than say, China. So it's not egregious and I don't think country size has anything to do with it.
I mean, someone did the courtesy of literally providing the table that shows how overvalued they are. Australia is 1.4% of exports and 0.5% of imports. Canada is 1.4% and 1.7%. That makes both of them less valuable than e.g. Ireland. Or the Netherlands. Or Belgium. In fact, both of them put together are less valuable than Belgium. Canada being the 10th largest economy in the world is fine and all, but it's an ocean away from us. Trade is bound by geography, and voting Brexit is just pretending we're in the mid-Pacific halfway between Australia and America. We're not. We're a European nation.
And the EU? It's about 33 times more important than Australia. You could have the deal with the EU take 33 times as long as one with Australia and it is still the better option. Doesn't matter how keen or quick Australia is.
Car manufacturers shifting research roles to Eastern Europe post Brexit.
https://www.theguardian.com/busines...rch-roles-to-eastern-europe-after-brexit-vote
I mean, someone did the courtesy of literally providing the table that shows how overvalued they are. Australia is 1.4% of exports and 0.5% of imports. Canada is 1.4% and 1.7%. That makes both of them less valuable than e.g. Ireland. Or the Netherlands. Or Belgium. In fact, both of them put together are less valuable than Belgium. Canada being the 10th largest economy in the world is fine and all, but it's an ocean away from us. Trade is bound by geography, and voting Brexit is just pretending we're in the mid-Pacific halfway between Australia and America. We're not. We're a European nation.
And the EU? It's about 33 times more important than Australia. You could have the deal with the EU take 33 times as long as one with Australia and it is still the better option. Doesn't matter how keen or quick Australia is.
SNP must explain how it will make Brexit work
The SNP must start outlining to the people of Scotland how it’s going to make Brexit a success, rather than “complaining from the sidelines” about the result.
But instead, he will add, since the vote the nationalists have merely bemoaned the result and compounded uncertainty by threatening another independence referendum.
“Yet rather than take these forward, rather than be positive about the future, all the SNP wants to do is sit on the sidelines and complain.
“Scottish ministers must be less downbeat, less pessimistic, and be more hopeful and show some leadership in seizing these chances.”
*Ding-dong*
"Hello?"
"Hello! I've set fire to your house and, well, I'm curious as to how you're going to deal with that?"
We have no details on what Brexit fucking means. Useless fools.
Brexit and trade agreements discussions in two short tweets:
Edit: the discussions carries on here, if you like to kill some brain cells.
Shoe eating time again.
Uhm, what happened/was announced at 3 am to cause such a fall?
Uhm, what happened/was announced at 3 am to cause such a fall?
London, Scotland and Northern Ireland were shown to have extracted best value from Government coffers in terms of public spending per person adjusted for regional prosperity the areas that most fervently backed the EU in the referendum.
Meanwhile, the study showed the East Midlands received the worst deal on public spending and was the second most pro-leave region.
Other areas with poor funding deals and high support for Brexit included the West Midlands, Yorkshire and the Humber and the North East.
The report challenges claims that the Brexit vote was just about disillusionment with the institutions of the European Union or that it was solely about immigration, the issue which featured most prominently in the referendum campaign.