There was a young fellow from Ankara
Who was a terrific wankerer
Awkwaaaaard.
but does he wank with the right hand?
There was a young fellow from Ankara
Who was a terrific wankerer
Awkwaaaaard.
The banking sector won't just disappear. There might well need to be some readjustment, especially if we lose passporting, but I honestly do not think that the financial services sector is going to pack up to the continent entirely.
Personally, I think we will leave the customs union and the single market (we have to really, politically speaking) but the Government will push hard for a bilateral free trade agreement including passporting.
Why should the EU accept such a deal? They would be crazy, right? Well, I dunno. It looks like the German banking sector may well explode at any time and could potentially take the Euro with it, I don't think come 2017 the EU/Eurozone will be in much of a position to gamble with any more risk and uncertainty. The negotiations are going to be pretty crazy, but we'll see.
I dunno, promising voters you can dictate what other countries will do seems to have worked in England, why not try it in France?
Even if the Eurozone pretty much collapses due to the German banking sector exploding (which is quite a stretch, to say the least), why would the EU accept such a deal? It doesn't have any reason to do so. The argument again seems to boil down to "EU has sth. to lose, so they won't gamble", although it's the UK that has far, far, far more to lose. It's economy is pretty much doomed (massive recession + hundreds of thousands lost jobs) if it doesn't get a proper free trade deal with the EU.
Heck I'd vote for him (lol)The man seems to be a non-stop source of nonsense these days.
He promises to prevent Brexit if elected.
The banking sector won't just disappear. There might well need to be some readjustment, especially if we lose passporting, but I honestly do not think that the financial services sector is going to pack up to the continent entirely.
Personally, I think we will leave the customs union and the single market (we have to really, politically speaking) but the Government will push hard for a bilateral free trade agreement including passporting.
Why should the EU accept such a deal? They would be crazy, right? Well, I dunno. It looks like the German banking sector may well explode at any time and could potentially take the Euro with it, I don't think come 2017 the EU/Eurozone will be in much of a position to gamble with any more risk and uncertainty. The negotiations are going to be pretty crazy, but we'll see.
If the Conservatives really were the pro-business party they wouldn't leave the single market. Theresa May and the 3 Brexiters are pretty much ideological fanatics at this point, though. It's emerged that Theresa May has altered the content of a pre referendum report on immigration because she didn't like the conclusion (which she has had a habit of doing).
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...o-alter-immigration-report-before-brexit-vote
So yeah, Theresa May is a Brexiter if this is true.
Because the Eurozone economy is in such a fragile state, still has pockets of mass unemployment and if a domino topples over the whole continent could collapse. The EU has a lot to lose if a deal isn't struck.
God damn, Boris and Trump are cut from the same cloth. Right down to the fucking hair.
Because the Eurozone economy is in such a fragile state, still has pockets of mass unemployment and if a domino topples over the whole continent could collapse. The EU has a lot to lose if a deal isn't struck.
Would it be bad for the UK economy if tariffs go up? Yes. Would it be a disaster on the scale you imagine? No, I don't think it would. But it is in the mutual interest of both parties to make a decent deal, the only thing stopping the EU is politics as other states might question why they can't get such a deal if they also left. It is a fascinating scenario coming up though, and the upcoming German and French election complicate things.
But at the end of the day I don't think anyone knows for certain what will happen.
Some 57 per cent of the 1.6 million cars made in Britain find buyers in the rest of the EU.
The next largest market is the US (12 per cent), followed by China (7 per cent).
Much the same goes for engines and commercial vehicles.
About a million jobs depend on the UK auto industry.
Tariffs in an industry where components cross more than one border through manufacturing would be "administratively hellish" as one industry insider put it.
Though much less covered, the free movement of labour is just as important to car companies with a global presnce and headquartred in Japan, Germany, India and the United States.
The companies, especially the German makes, need to move their managers, engineers and staff around with a minimum of hassle.
They do not, they admit, want their chief designer waiting in a queue for a work permit.
All the companies put on a united front and a good shoe at Paris, but there was no mistaking their anxiety.
As models become due for replacement and big investment decisions loom, most agree that the relationship with the EU will be a vital factor in the next few years
Boris is a smart man pretending to be an idiot
Trump is an idiot pretending to be smart
Conservatives: casually introducing radical change since 1979.
I've always been a leftie, but I have a mite of sympathy for certain proper old school Tory ideas. Some, I say.
Survey - http://survey2016.scot
Please vote, the survey is largely based around gathering interest for an independence referendum.
The YouGov survey, carried out four weeks after Scotland was put on course to be taken out of the bloc against the wishes of a majority of its voters, found 47 per cent would back Yes and 53 per cent No if an independence vote was held tomorrow.
It also found that 55 per cent would rather remain in a UK which is not in the EU, compared to 45 per cent who would prefer to live in an independent Scotland that retained membership, when undecided respondents are excluded.
The result suggests that an increase in support for independence in the days following the EU referendum, when other pollsters suggested that a narrow majority favoured leaving the UK, has already tailed off.
Two months after telling reporters a referendum was “highly likely” within the next two years, she told MSPs that that bill would now only be introduced if she believed it was the best option for Scotland.
Survey - http://survey2016.scot
Please vote, the survey is largely based around gathering interest for an independence referendum.
Sounds like she's trying to build support more than anything else.until the polls show a clear gap for independence (which they don't at all) this is all hot air really.....
until the polls show a clear gap for independence (which they don't at all) this is all hot air really.....
Sounds like she's trying to build support more than anything else.
Yeah I just don't understand the "hot air" complaint. She isn't saying Scotland is leaving or even (explicitly) that they should leave, just that it's an option she wants people to talk about.The best chance for a free Scotland is in the first few years after the UK leaves the EU, i'm sure she knows getting the timing right is important and not pushing too hard and too early.
The best chance for a free Scotland is in the first few years after the UK leaves the EU, i'm sure she knows getting the timing right is important and not pushing too hard and too early.
So if she can't stop a hard Brexit, then Scoxit means an indyScot outside the EU by necessity, which I think is much less palatable.
I think if I were Sturgeon, my main focus would be on blocking or delaying Brexit, though. Scoxit is better if the UK remains in the single market, because then Scotland is also in the single market with the UK. Scotland and the UK being in different economic markets would be disastrous - 46% of the UK's trade is with Europe, but if you treat Scotland as its own country, 68% of Scotland's trade is with the rUK. So if she can't stop a hard Brexit, then Scoxit means an indyScot outside the EU by necessity, which I think is much less palatable.
Also, if you can block or delay Brexit, that's a pretty huge accomplishment which I think would cement her position in Scotland even more so, and really help with her case. So I think her main aim will just be to act as a rallying point for Remainers across the United Kingdom and not just in Scotland, threaten to bring legal suits like the one being brought in Northern Ireland about whether it is even possible for the UK to leave without consent of the devolved administrations, offer to form a coalition with whichever UK parties oppose Brexit (this one is especially great for the SNP because it fucks over Labour even more, and the SNP benefit massively from an even more irrelevant Labour party), and so on.
This survey seems like a step towards that to me. Challenge the Conservatives with the tonnes of people in Scotland who think it's bloody stupid; and argue she has a huge mandate because she actually asked everyone whereas May can't even tell anyone what Brexit means.
Does it? There were earlier rumblings that Scotland could negotiate direct entry into the EU during a combined Brexit/Scoxit.
insert something about Spain veto + Gilbrater/Catalonia
Sturgeon appears to smartly be laying the groundwork to immediately call for another independence referendum once Article 50 is invoked and then wrap that up to negotiate staying in the EU before Brexit is complete
No, I'm saying: it would be sheer idiocy for an independent Scotland to join the EU if the rUK isn't in the single market. I don't think any Scottish politician would genuinely do it (although admittedly I thought that about British politicians and Brexit, but Scotland seems to currently have a better breed of politician).
The reason leaving the EU is bad is because it removes the UK from a single market accounting for 46% of exports, and instead means the UK is subject to the tariffs, quotas, and other restrictions the EU puts on it.
If indyScot is in the EU, and the UK is outside of it, then indyScot has to trade with the UK on EU terms. As we know, very well by now, those terms are looking like they'll be rather bad. That means if indyScot joins the EU, it takes indyScot out of a single market accounting for 68%(!!) of exports, and instead means indyScot is subject to the tariffs, quotas, and other restrictions that the UK puts on EU goods (which the UK will definitely have to do).
If the UK does a hard Brexit, and Scotland becomes independent, the best thing Scotland can do from an economic perspective is make a really good trade agreement with the UK. This would be more valuable for Scotland, economically, than entering the EU - and these things are mutually exclusive at this point. That's how geography works, unfortunately.
So that's what I mean when I say it is massively in Sturgeon's interests Brexit doesn't happen. Because if the UK stays in the single market, Scotland can trade with the UK in a single market AND the EU in a single market. Which means you don't have a terrible decision to make like the one above.
Theresa May is running a "government with no policies" and no idea how to carry out Britain's exit from the European Union, Tory grandee Ken Clarke has warned.
In a scathing attack on the Conservative administration, the former chancellor also took a sideswipe at the so-called "three Brexiteers" - Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Brexit Secretary David Davis and International Trade Secretary Liam Fox.
Mr Clarke said the Prime Minister was saddled with an "appalling problem" in getting the trio to work together and highlighted the difficulties she faced on maintaining party unity given the demands by "ultra-Eurosceptics".
And the pro-EU MP revealed he would vote against Brexit in the House of Commons, branding the referendum an "opinion poll" and David Cameron's decision to hold the vote "catastrophic".
His comments come ahead of the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham, amid divisions over whether to pursue a so-called "hard Brexit" outside the European single market or to remain part of it.
In an interview with the New Statesman, Mr Clarke, who is stepping down at the next election, said: "Nobody in the Government has the first idea of what they're going to do next on the Brexit front."
EU President Martin Schulz says the UK must trigger Article 50 before it can start Brexit negotiations
He warned the three cabinet ministers charged with delivering Brexit that "serious uncertainty in your trading and political relationships with the rest of the world is dangerous if you allow it to persist".
On party splits over Brexit, Mr Clarke said: "Whatever is negotiated will be denounced by the ultra-Eurosceptics as a betrayal."
He added: "Theresa May has had the misfortune of taking over at the most impossible time.
"She faces an appalling problem of trying to get these 'three Brexiteers' to agree with each other."
He also singled out Mr Johnson and his former Vote Leave ally Michael Gove for giving "respectability" to "(Nigel) Farage's arguments that immigration was somehow a great peril caused by the EU".
Disagree. If the choice is between EU and UK then EU would be the more valuable choice [after a painful/difficult transition as Scotland weens itself of UK]
I don't see article 50 being the spark for Scottish independence, it is just more uncertainty. the English ignoring Scotland, getting a bad deal and the economy tanking after we leave seems the best chance to me, anger and unemployment.
i get what Crab is saying, i just think emotion can sway opinion.
Disagree. If the choice is between EU and UK then EU would be the more valuable choice [after a painful/difficult transition as Scotland weens itself of UK]
Oh, for sure. I could see a Scottish populist sentiment saying "fuck the English, we're joining the EU anyway" in a post-independence Scotland; the same sort of sentiment that powered Brexit in the UK. I just think that Nicola Sturgeon is a better class of politician than David Cameron and that the Scots have shown more resilience against populism. I think if Scotland did become independent, Sturgeon would know that the first thing to do is reach a trade agreement with rUK.
Also, we might get to hear Lizzie say "Would you like a trade agreement with England?", which would make everything worth it.
This is just not true, over 60% of Scotland's exports go to the UK compared to just 15% to the EU.
Ken Clarke keeps dropping the truth bombs.
http://news.sky.com/story/ken-clarke-says-theresa-mays-government-not-first-idea-on-brexit-10597851
Considering the SNP's landslide victory I'm going to say no, the loss of the center ground is very much a UK-wide thing.
Blackhead said:Right now yes. However EU is fundamentally a bigger market, and UK's will shrink even more once they leave the EU. Also there's an opportunity for Scotland to take UK's place as the English speaking** entrant to the continent, great timezone etc. The better bet is on the EU imo
**insert har har nobody understands the scottish accent 'joke'
Right now yes. However EU is fundamentally a bigger market, and UK's will shrink even more once they leave the EU. Also there's an opportunity for Scotland to take UK's place as the English speaking** entrant to the continent, great timezone etc. The better bet is on the EU imo
**insert har har nobody understands the scottish accent 'joke'
Let's suppose the UK's demand for Scottish exports halves, and that the EU's demand for Scottish exports doubles. Guess what: the rUK would actually still account for a larger portion of Scotland's exports than the EU would! And we're already having to push ourselves deeply into fantasy land to get here; the UK will get hit by Brexit hard, but its import propensity isn't going to half, the EU is growing, but at current growth rates it will take about 142 years before the EU's export propensity has doubled.
Again, this is Brexit talk. It's like saying: the United States is a bigger market than the EU, we're better off negotiating with the US. Well, no: trade is more than just a matter of who's biggest. You trade more with your neighbours because transportation costs are lower, you trade more with people you share a language with because it makes it easier providing services, and so on.
Want to understand trade? Think gravity: size and distance matter. Scotland-UK is greater than Scotland-EU. Jupiter is big, but the moon moves tides.
No shit but EU is not that far. This isn't like swapping EU for Australia as some Brexiters were suggesting.
Ireland is a useful example. Britain is not Ireland's most lucrative EU trading partner - Belgium is. I would bet on a similar future for Scotland
I just don't see it, as Crab says there would have to be a monumental shift in balance for what you are suggesting to happen, but hey ho.
In other news, the German finance ministry has calculated that post Brexit Germany will have to pay an extra €4.5 billion a year in contributions in 19/20.
Those 4.5B representing about 0.3% of total government expenditures, I think they can probably handle that.