Bloomberg has made a couple fantastic charts which compare arrangements.
Jason Langrish one of Canadas authorities in the field says the UKs former ambassador to the EU, Sir Ivan Rogers, who resigned last week and quit the civil service, was absolutely right to say that a British deal could also take a decade to strike.
Langrish, who was closely involved in the prolonged Canadian talks, argues that Rogers analysis of the time-scale seems realistic, and says discussions he has had with UK government officials about Brexit suggest that there is little chance of minimising serious potential damage from the UKs exit from the European Union.
Although he has no formal role in advising the UK, Langrish has been sounded out behind the scenes by those involved with handling Brexit in Whitehall. The impression he has been left with is that unless the British government shows more flexibility it will probably have to revert to World Trade Organisation rules and common tariffs, which could lop 4% off UK GDP.
Referring to his talks with UK officials, he writes: While they have always been pleasant (and notably friendly towards Canada), my view is that they remain in campaign mode.
Were they willing to realistically discuss options for Brexit, as opposed to telling you what they intend to do in a general sense while dismissing the obvious concerns, they may have a chance to minimise the damage from the potentially catastrophic decision to leave. This seems increasingly unlikely. Lets hope that the courts, parliament and, ultimately, the electorate do it for them.
The problem with this chart is that none of these are former members of the EU. All of them have their exemptions in good faith provided they keep their part of the bargain. UK's bargain was not doing any leaving shenanigans. Turkey was the UK trying to get them in the EU with the rest of the union objecting so a compromise is reached and you have their current position. EEA members are usually an understanding that these countries are members in all but name, to avoid some political issues at home. The UK couldn't transition in any of these statuses without causing objections that would stop such a move in its tracks not least when it wants even more one sided exemptions for itself.so if I'm looking at that right the brexit people basically think they're going to get the same deal as Turkey with all the benefits like banking and retiring to Spain and in return the EU get nothing.
I'd be surprised if May wasn't laughed out of the building.
Looks like I spoke to soon, train crash Brexit is out. Catastrophic Brexit is in.
Britain risks a ”catastrophic" Brexit because the government is so dismissive of the concerns of trade experts, according to one of the figures behind the EU-Canada trade deal which took a decade to negotiate.
4% off GDP. Ouch.
Brexiter: "4% isn't that much, 96% of it is still there, we have sovereignty so it's worth it"
Sophie Ridge gets big story with her 1st interview: PM confirms we'll no longer be members of single market (and probably customs union too)
https://twitter.com/afneil/Remain media will report PM's interview as confirming what they regard as "hard Brexit".
BTW: What's the "Remain Media"?
PM says she wants UK to get the right deal with EU, but not to keep bits of membership
https://twitter.com/nickeardleybbc/Strong hints PM isn't seeking single market membership, talking about an "ambitious" trade deal, but not keeping parts of EU membership
How can they be so stupid.
BTW: What's the "Remain Media"?
From yesterday's FT
The Chinese directly citing Brexit as a reason they're holding back on investing further in the UK.
<thingsarelookingprettygood.gif>
I may be ignorant to the reasons , but why would Britain be a gateway to Europe anymore than any of the other 27 members?In a couple of years, the UK may need to tear up the economic strategy that it has followed for decades and come up with a new one, as it will not be able to offer itself as a gateway to Europe as it currently does.
The UK's sell is that they speak English, and are stable politically. Ireland gets a lot of that business too. The reason that English is so important is it's much easier to relocate your operations when you can bring over your executives there. Many multinationals use English as a business language. This doesn't matter though when you are leaving the EU, you are no longer in the running at all. Brexit has also brought a time of nearly unprecedented political and legislative uncertainty for businesses.I may be ignorant to the reasons , but why would Britain be a gateway to Europe anymore than any of the other 27 members?
There must be other reasons that global companies invest in Britain .
Pound has fallen.....investors believe May signalled her preference for a hard brexit in Sundays interview
Pound has fallen.....investors believe May signalled her preference for a hard brexit in Sundays interview
The pound falls every time May opens her mouth.
The Sturgeonator has been turning the heat on May saying she has no plan lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYfSyxyoDPc
The UK would lose negotiating capital in Europe if it unilaterally granted EU citizens the right to remain after Brexit, the government has said.
Agreeing a unilateral position in advance of these negotiations would lose negotiating capital with respect to British citizens in EU member states and place the UK at an immediate disadvantage, said the letter signed by Peter Grant, an official in the free movement policy team of the immigration and border policy directorate of the Home Office.
Assuring EU citizens of right to stay 'would lose UK negotiating capital'
Disgusting stuff, even for a May government.
Assuring EU citizens of right to stay 'would lose UK negotiating capital'
Disgusting stuff, even for a May government.
The UK's image is so ruined because of this. But immigrants amirite.
You know the pound has dropped 20% against the dollar since Brexit right? You don't think that might affect a restaurant chain that imports a lot and exports little?Nice to see Tesco not blame Brexit for the 1000 job cuts today...unlike Jamie Oliver...
You know the pound has dropped 20% against the dollar since Brexit right? You don't think that might affect a restaurant chain that imports a lot and exports little?
Is Jamie now an enemy of the people like Gary Lineker and the gay fencer?
He has form. Did it in 2014 as well blaming touch economic conditions.
Free mass grave for all!!!Oh look May saying she wants to help people with mental health issues, just like Cameron did. I will wait for fuck all to change.
Jeremy Corbyn is to say Labour is not "wedded" to freedom of movement for EU citizens in the UK as a "matter of principle", as he sets out his views on Brexit negotiations.
In a speech, the party leader will argue the UK "can be better off" after leaving the EU, but add that he will not allow Theresa May a "free pass".
Corbyn has just been interviewed on BBC R5. Finally somebody willing to speak about the massive problems within the construction industry regarding pay and conditions as a result of freedom of movement.
Rightly sighting exploitation of migrant workers by greedy companies and agencies as the problem rather than blaming the people moving here to better their lives and the lives of their family.
He seemed to suggest a minimum wage be introduced into law for skilled workers .
Jeremy has just upped his chances of winning my vote massively and that is something I would never have thought I'd say.
The problem is price work and pricing jobs well below minimum wage given time needed.Isn't the problem people not abiding to minimum wage laws as it is?
If a good wage is enforced for day works then prices will have to increase in line . Nobody I know would work price for less than day works.The problem is price work and pricing jobs well below minimum wage given time needed.
Don't see how can possibly fix that.
Corbyn to confirm in a speech he is not against blocking free movement of people...
Disgusting waste of space as a leader, this man is. I don't believe that an opposition should merely oppose for opposition's sake, but equally he should have some fucking common sense and try to appeal to some of the disaffected 48% who didn't want to leave the EU by at least championing retaining single market access.
He is actually being worse than useless and is giving the public no reason to vote Labour when a GE does come around. What a shit show.
Either is a losing proposition for the labour party. It is estimated 75% of their voters voted remain yet a lot of their seats voted leave. FPTP makes it a lose-lose proposition for them and Libdems seem to have swept the rug under Labour's feet in many of their seats if polls are to be believed, largely by appealing to the 48%. The other point of course is that off the 52%, not all of them are Brexit of busters, that last one will also hurt the Tories depending on what they can deliver in the negotiations.Playing Devil's Advocate for a second; since we all think that Corbyn lacks electability and needs more popular policies to even stand a chance, why do you think he should try to appeal to what we know is a minority of voters on this issue?
The fact is that we know, quite clearly, that opposing Brexit is a losing proposition for the Labour party.
Playing Devil's Advocate for a second; since we all think that Corbyn lacks electability and needs more popular policies to even stand a chance, why do you think he should try to appeal to what we know is a minority of voters on this issue?
The fact is that we know, quite clearly, that opposing Brexit is a losing proposition for the Labour party.