Scary when I watch QT and I realise that GAF hive is more savvy than the politicians.
Yes the out process has never been clearly defined, this point was a raised a couple of times during the Greek mess two years ago, I think both sides of the channel will find long-held beliefs and certainties are less certain than had been supposed .
The point is, these things are not 'accidentally' vague as you mentioned, it was done on purpose. Some people I've spoken to think it was an accident, which it clearly is not.
It meant to be dissuasive, and this dimension has failed.
Political equivalent of this:
![]()
That Labour woman is talking so much sense
Thank you, it's a mess and nobody has a clue what they're doing.
That Labour woman is talking so much sense
Thank you, it's a mess and nobody has a clue what they're doing.
Yes but then she's stating the bleeding obvious in a loud voice to get some applause, like everyone who comes on QT.That Labour woman is talking so much sense
Thank you, it's a mess and nobody has a clue what they're doing.
One doesn't have to be particularly astute to come to this conclusion.
But can you all eat sandwiches without looking like weirdos?
UKIP are actually the most honest party on this. They basically say we can still trade with Europe on WTO rules and that is better value and better for our economy than obeying the 4 Pillars of the Single Market.
Brexit is not going to happen. It never was. Politics is now about explaining this is the case, following the non-binding referendum.
I study Law, and to be fair the vast majority of legislation, legal documents and so forth are intentionally vague.
Take for example, one of the old but now repealed Dangerous Dogs Act actually stated nothing more than 'a dangerous dog'. It was vague and absolutely ridiculous. Its purpose was for legal enforcement to determine what was meant by that. That was extreme however, so thus was repealed.
The point is, these things are not 'accidentally' vague as you mentioned, it was done on purpose. Some people I've spoken to think it was an accident, which it clearly is not.
Vague doesn't matter, its Parliaments intention not the (actual) Act
iirc the Dangerous Dogs Act was amended not repealed
Last one (and I studied it and practiced) don't get tied up with this ideal world that Uni teaches you, the reality is vastly different
We've got a Queen and everything.We'll be fine, because we're Britain! Remember when we won two world wars? They don't call us Great Britain for nothing.
christ on a bike, all these people can keep saying are "not all leavers are racists!"
We've got a Queen and everything.
They did and were dismissed as "scaremongering"?Why weren't people brave enough to damn the idea of 'Leave' as much as they are now?
Why weren't people brave enough to damn the idea of 'Leave' as much as they are now?
What do the conservatives get out of this? More freedom to fuck things up and pare back workers rights? All the candidates are seemingly happily behind leaving.
What do the conservatives get out of this? More freedom to fuck things up and pare back workers rights? All the candidates are seemingly happily behind leaving.
Russell Kane is really really good here
less regulation for them to contend with, workers rights, civil rights, environmental etc.
The french were gentle??
fucking hell lady they want our banks in exchange!
But surely they're going to get fucked over when people see the results being worse than the status quo.