It's 672p?
edit: Damn
Not everyone has a pc that can play this.
To answer the question, I probably would buy a console to play this game. But you should look at what else the 360 offers and not just buy one for this game.
So spend $60+$200 to play one game? Buy a used desktop and a newer GPU and enjoy 1080P! Think of Steam and all those glorious $5 games!
Yeah I would say anyone interested enough in this game to buy a console for it might as well just get a pc/upgrade and that version.
I just snuck in another hour messing around in the first town you get to.
I think what gets me with this game is the edge it has that would be polished out of most other devs from feedback from focus groups/accessibility/wider audience etc.
This game feels like the Game of Thrones of RPGs to me.
The only character I'm not in love with so far is the bard.
Love the amount of Arseholes in this game too, brings me pure joy!
Will there be a regular version, as opposed to the Enhanced Edition? If so, is the Enhanced Edition limited?
the enhanced edition is the regular edition. it costs 60$.
No. For all intended () purposes, the EE is the Witcher 2. It should not be limited, no.Will there be a regular version, as opposed to the Enhanced Edition? If so, is the Enhanced Edition limited?
After I'm done with this on 360 I'll defo grab the first one on PC and the other stuff in the world.Already played the first Witcher? TW2 is my GOTY2011 but the first one is even better
I just snuck in another hour messing around in the first town you get to.
I think what gets me with this game is the edge it has that would be polished out of most other devs from feedback from focus groups/accessibility/wider audience etc.
This game feels like the Game of Thrones of RPGs to me.
The only character I'm not in love with so far is the bard.
Love the amount of Arseholes in this game too, brings me pure joy!
No. For all intensive purposes, the EE is the Witcher 2. It should not be limited, no.
They have/had a collectors edition for EE which is called the Dark Edition and seemed quite limited.
After I'm done with this on 360 I'll defo grab the first one on PC and the other stuff in the world.
Anyone here played both PC and 360 versions? I'd just like to know how it controls on 360, especially the combat.
Already played the first Witcher? TW2 is my GOTY2011 but the first one is even better
Sucks that the free PC backup won't be out until next week. I bought the Steam version, but I've read that version runs a little slower because of the DRM. I want the GOG stuff!
Pretty sure they fixed this.
i wouldn't say the first is better. it definitely does somethings better though in regards to story and pacing.
I hope they at least fix the Steam overlay, and especially the the bug that launches the M Net framework installer every fucking time you try to play the game.
I would say the second is much better than the first in most regards...the first is a pretty archaic game in many aspects
Replaying TW1 right now, and while the mood and story are both great, the game hasn't aged very well. Cinematics are fisheyed and the animation is awkward at best.
Yeah, design-wise a lot of the quests do things that AAA console games from big publishers just wouldn't do at all. A lot of things having to do with the context of the story in relation to the challenge in finishing quests. One Chapter 2 quest in particular perfectly illustrates this.
Triss is hotter in 2, more importantly
No. For all intended () purposes, the EE is the Witcher 2. It should not be limited, no.
They have/had a collectors edition for EE which is called the Dark Edition and seemed quite limited.
better applied use of magic, if you know what i mean.
Damn, I'm really getting my ass kicked on normal difficulty. I had to finish the first chapter on easy, and I'm afraid that easy will stay here for the rest of the game.
Damn, I'm really getting my ass kicked on normal difficulty. I had to finish the first chapter on easy, and I'm afraid that easy will stay here for the rest of the game.
I don't even like to harp on reviews, for the most part, but the raw difference in treatment between these two is pretty damn hilarious
TW2: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/122/1222949p1.html -- Low-key fare, don't agree with a way it was went about, but no real issue.
ME3: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/03/06/mass-effect-3-review --Big ol splash page, AMAZING, 9.5 at the front, NO NEGATIVES, BUY NOW AT GAMESTOP. ffs.
i wouldn't say the first is better. it definitely does somethings better though in regards to story and pacing.
I would say the second is much better than the first in most regards...the first is a pretty archaic game in many aspects
Yeah, TW1 affected me much more than TW2 did. The story and pacing was better and it had an extremely solid ending. This might sound weird but I also liked all of the grindy monster slaying quests in TW1 on top of it having more monster variety. I would pay a lot of money fora TW1 remake on the RED engine.The first Witcher has the best choice system ever...the story is better i know is slower, but that fits well with the style of narration of discover the world at the same that Gerald (and other thing like the ending and/ final boss debate), the feels of freedom...and like the books you can go neutral..Alvin
And i really love TW2 like a said before is my GOTY 2011...
It's $50 at Target on Tuesday. Definitely going to pick this up.
Thanks! Even better.You can still pre-order at TRU for $44.99
http://www.toysrus.com/product/index.jsp?productId=12644778
Yeah I don't want to say anything against the quality of the ME series, because it is great, but you can damn well bet that if TW2 had a bigger marketing budget when it came out last year, it would've been getting slightly higher scores and more goty nods.8.5 for TW2 and 9.5 for ME3?
Someone's either fucking retarded or EA lined IGN's wallets. This is fucking shameless.
This isn't even an opinion, LOOK AT THESE TWO FUCKING THINGS.
Wow! I was just watching Witcher 1's video review (I know the game came out in 2007) and I have to say, the second game received massive graphical upgrade. Honestly, it is staggering. Even more so when I read somewhere in this forum that it cost around US $8 million to develop.
Also, does anyone know why they skipped over the first game to port to console?
Also, does anyone know why they skipped over the first game to port to console?
I don't even like to harp on reviews, for the most part, but the raw difference in treatment between these two is pretty damn hilarious
TW2: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/122/1222949p1.html -- Low-key fare, don't agree with a way it was went about, but no real issue.
ME3: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/03/06/mass-effect-3-review --Big ol splash page, AMAZING, 9.5 at the front, NO NEGATIVES, BUY NOW AT GAMESTOP. ffs.
Mass Effect 3 isnt the best game ever made. But itll certainly be in the conversation for a very long time to come.
Another reminder that Dark mode exists and although difficult at first, blalnces the game for later levels when you become OP with magic and skill treees....unfortuately there is not that much increase in enemy difficulty so even for those that are getting hammered on normal I suggest dark...the extra armours are nice albeit expensive and difficult to craft, but dark was patched in later for a reason...it balances the game overall. The only problem is yo can't swith back ot dark if you go easy later...and you will lose the armours.Damn, I'm really getting my ass kicked on normal difficulty. I had to finish the first chapter on easy, and I'm afraid that easy will stay here for the rest of the game.
Also, does anyone know why they skipped over the first game to port to console?
ahuahuahuhauhauhuaha
Mass Effect 3 was not even the best game of its release month