Haunted
Member
never skip leg day
never skip leg day
never skip leg day
haha, hope you mean kear morhen
Finally got to Skellige. It's amazing.
Completing Triss' subplot and romancing her before going to Skellige makes the scenes with Yen kinda awkward.
Alsobefore going which I think is the logical thing to do for a natural story progression. Ended up at level 17 before leaving Novigrad.freed Dandelion
Wow, that's even more times than me. Awesome! You should really post in the community thread with the kind of knowledge you have of the games. I'm guessing you've read the books?
Drawing a blank, aside from Dishonored or Deus Ex Human Revolution maybe.
Finished it damn it.
A damn fine gameI had the bad ending. Geralt getting swarmed by the monsters in the end. Ciri gone. wtf. I made the wrong choices apparently
Reasons of State quest rambling:I kind of want see how this quest will pan out but on the other hand, I don't really want Radovid dead. The last thing the North needs right now is a coup, interregnum and civil war. Radovid might be a dick but at least he is a strong dick and has somewhat of a chance to unite the North and create an equal rival for the Nilfgaard. Wonder if the events will pan out the same regardless of my decision. Decisions, decisions.
Reasons of State quest rambling:I kind of want see how this quest will pan out but on the other hand, I don't really want Radovid dead. The last thing the North needs right now is a coup, interregnum and civil war. Radovid might be a dick but at least he is a strong dick and has somewhat of a chance to unite the North and create an equal rival for the Nilfgaard. Wonder if the events will pan out the same regardless of my decision. Decisions, decisions.
And even now, I still can't play Dijkstra for his Gwent card. -_-
don't really see howRadovid can unite the North when he's killing half the population and even his own men doubt him. Someone like Radovid should never be in power.
Well ihad high hope for him in previous game. But seeing the dude now I think Nilfgaard ruling the north altogether is not that bad after all.
Still Reason of State spoilers:Sorceresses, wizards are like 0,000001 of the population though.
+ At least the Lodge deserves all they got and more.
I seem to remember reading that Nilfgaard has slavery so it's not like theIr hands are particularly clean either.
but heHe's not killing half of his population though, sorceresses, wizards are like 0,000001 of the population.
+ At least the Lodge deserves all they got and more.
Did you guys kill Wham-a-mam?
That troll hits hard.
Reasons of State quest rambling:I kind of want see how this quest will pan out but on the other hand, I don't really want Radovid dead. The last thing the North needs right now is a coup, interregnum and civil war. Radovid might be a dick but at least he is a strong dick and has somewhat of a chance to unite the North and create an equal rival for the Nilfgaard. Wonder if the events will pan out the same regardless of my decision. Decisions, decisions.
And even now, I still can't play Dijkstra for his Gwent card. -_-
Radovid isn't just a bad ruler. He's fucking crazy.
Still Reason of State spoilers:
Hmm, but they don't justkill sorceresses and wizards, they've fled so now they kill non-humans, and when they are gone, they'll start killing some other group.
but hestarted ordering elves, dwarves and other non-humans be killed as well.
.
Do you still know where it was? Wanted to do it later but already forgot the location. Southeastern island, wasn't it?
Very disappointed with the game performance on Skellige. The constant microstutter is very off putting. I've been playing the game at a snails pace, taking in as much as possible. So this is probably old news to a lot of you. Hopefully it gets fixed in future patches, right now it's Skyrim PS3 fps levels bad.
.That ending is sad for sure but it still is a very fitting ending albeit tragedic
PS4 right?Is it worse than Velen?
Hopefully it gets fixed in future patches, right now it's Skyrim PS3 fps levels bad.
PS4 right?Is it worse than Velen?
So it is this bad, huh?
https://youtu.be/RaeU3DvW5-o?t=10
Sounds like you heard something something about Skyrim's framerate on the PS3 and just went with it, without having any clue what problems a lot of us had with that game on that platform.
The Witcher 3 has some minor performance issues but it is in no way or shape that bad.
So questions regarding where I am at in the game. I was about to go toand got a warning to manually save before doing so because I won't be able to finish some side quests after.mist isles
1. What quests won't I be able to complete (please spoiler mark)
2. How close am I to the end of the main story?
The more I play this game, the further it separates itself as the greatest game ever made for me. Games like TLOU and Skyrim are in my gaming Mt. Rushmore, but they aren't really close to Witcher 3. The story, voice acting, quest development, all of it is on another level. I also really LOVE the combat and sort of scratch my head when people complain about it.
The visuals on PC are GORGEOUS. Its the best looking game I've ever seen given the scope.
The game makes my jaw drop daily, and thats not hyperbole. I knew I was going to like this game having waited for it for years, but it somehow surpassed my expectations. I'm so damn happy right now to be playing a game that I 100% adore and consider the best I've ever played. Its an awesome feeling.
I'm at 55 hours and just now going through Novigrad. Lord knows how long it will take me to finish this game.
Maybe the Skyrim reference was a bit much.
I stand corrected, it's nowhere near as bad as Skyrim/New Vegas on PS3 (that video brings back some bad memories, had to finish Skyrim on PC, an barley made it through New Vegas, the final battle in NV might have well been a slideshow.)
The microstutter is pretty bad though. By my count it occurs every 3-4 seconds.
Finished it damn it.
A damn fine gameI had the bad ending. Geralt getting swarmed by the monsters in the end. Ciri gone. wtf. I made the wrong choices apparently
Without spoiling anything the ending you receive is not based on arbitrary concepts of good vs. evil, like how many lives you take or those you preserve. It's based on other factors related to narrative development, and not so easily regulated to "good ending" and "bad ending".
Haven't played the other two games but he certainly doesn't strike me as someone I would have associated Geralt with having as a bestie. Seems a pretty pathetic character. Is he supposed to be the comic relief? Again, his VA is awful imo. Same with Lambert and Triss to a lesser extent.
I don't think having Vesimir's VA voice old Dandelion in the load screen narration was a great idea either. Was very confusing.
I'm feeling the same. I've done all the Witcher contracts and everything. Tempted to get Elder Scrolls Online to fill the void.I am struggling to find a game to play after finishing TW3. Nothing seems remotely interesting, tried to finish Pillars of Eternity but also can't.
Goddamn it.
Godfuckingdamn it.
I can't even fathom how people can get the "bad" ending.Are all of you really that mean to Ciri on purpose?
Anyone here of the books readers and fans didn't liked how CDPR handled Ciri in this game?
(I know the games are not canon, but Ciri running away and needing all the help and doing almost nothing was not really in the spirit of the later books)
Reasons of State spoilerslulz First Radovid betrays me (and here I was putting in a good word for you) then Dijkstra. I would actually roll with his super Redania plan but he was really, really stupid if he thought he could be king. + I didn't want to fuck over Roche two games in a row.
Does Radovid die even if you don't do this quest ?
From what I hear Ciri in the books is suffering from extreme "chosen one" syndrome, so if they tore that down a bit in the game, I welcome it.Anyone here of the books readers and fans didn't liked how CDPR handled Ciri in this game?
(I know the games are not canon, but Ciri running away and needing all the help and doing almost nothing was not really in the spirit of the later books)
No, he doesn't die if you don't do the quest. And yeah, the conclusion felt really poorly thought out, Dijkstra himself even admitted to being a poor fighter earlier in the game, yet he figured that himself + a few thugs could take out the people who just took out the entire Redanian royal guard.
Not to mention the choice of being able to leave Roche & Co behind, did he really that we'd let the guy who just helped us defeat the Wild Hunt in Kaer Mohran die?
Very out of character. Also, even if you beat him there's no surrender, dialogue or anything, you just cut him in two like he's some sort of common bandit.
Many of the choices that lead to the positive endingsI can't even fathom how people can get the "bad" ending.Are all of you really that mean to Ciri on purpose?
Yes, very much so.Anyone here of the books readers and fans didn't liked how CDPR handled Ciri in this game?
(I know the games are not canon, but Ciri running away and needing all the help and doing almost nothing was not really in the spirit of the later books)
This game guys, goddamn.. This game.
It's been years since I had this feeling of just wandering around, exploring the place and loving the view.
Just look at it. This game is absolutely breathtaking at times.
This game guys, goddamn.. This game.
It's been years since I had this feeling of just wandering around, exploring the place and loving the view.
Just look at it. This game is absolutely breathtaking at times.
Can't believe i'm starting a new game right after finishing it. Haven't done that since Baldur's gate 2 or Mask of the betrayer.
Very well put. It hadn't occurred to me exactly why it worked so well, but now that I think about it you're absolutely on the money.There's obviously gamey stuff in there, but yeah. As I said in my review, it's probably the most organic, naturally structured open world I've played. It has a real sense of presence and independence beyond your avatar existing in the world, as if it would all still exist coherently and believably without your involvement. Even the gamey stuff like treasure and monster nests are integrated logically into the landmass with the right amount of visual and note based story telling.
It's the first open world RPG in a long, long time where I don't feel all facets of the questing and objectives are pandering to my presence, and instead it's just a world as is that I'm discovering on my own.
Witcher 3 is one of those games, who on screens it doesn't look particular great (without some of mods or editing), but in motion, when you play the game self, is fucking gorgeous.
No, he doesn't die if you don't do the quest. And yeah, the conclusion felt really poorly thought out, Dijkstra himself even admitted to being a poor fighter earlier in the game, yet he figured that himself + a few thugs could take out the people who just took out the entire Redanian royal guard.
Not to mention the choice of being able to leave Roche & Co behind, did he really that we'd let the guy who just helped us defeat the Wild Hunt in Kaer Mohran die?
Very out of character. Also, even if you beat him there's no surrender, dialogue or anything, you just cut him in two like he's some sort of common bandit.
Witcher 3 is one of those games, who on screens it doesn't look particular great (without some of mods or editing), but in motion, when you play the game self, is fucking gorgeous
I'm too making ton of screens, because at that moment the game is just looking fantastic, but then I look at (some) of those screens, and I'm "hmmm.. this doesn't look as good as it looked directly in the game"
Anyone here of the books readers and fans didn't liked how CDPR handled Ciri in this game?
(I know the games are not canon, but Ciri running away and needing all the help and doing almost nothing was not really in the spirit of the later books)