A Fish Aficionado
I am going to make it through this year if it kills me
There's no such thing. More. More!
More asbestos! More asbestos! More asbestos!
There's no such thing. More. More!
"What's the point of making more people?"
real talk though overpopulation is rapidly becoming a problem
There's no such thing. More. More!
Amidst all these less than serious replies is an inconvenient truth, and it's a truth that the creator of Steamspy himself has commented on many times. Due to various shortcomings inherent to the Steam platform, the Steam catalogue may never contain more than 2^13 (8192) titles at any one given time, and so once this number is reached, old titles will need to be permanently removed from Steam in order for new titles to be added.
At the current rate of production, peak Steam will be achieved absolutely no later than 2019, at which time some of the oldest classics on Steam may be in real jeopardy of disappearing. Food for thought for anyone considering PC gaming.
Amidst all these less than serious replies is an inconvenient truth, and it's a truth that the creator of Steamspy himself has commented on many times. Due to various shortcomings inherent to the Steam platform, the Steam catalogue may never contain more than 2^13 (8192) titles at any one given time, and so once this number is reached, old titles will need to be permanently removed from Steam in order for new titles to be added.
At the current rate of production, peak Steam will be achieved absolutely no later than 2019, at which time some of the oldest classics on Steam may be in real jeopardy of disappearing. Food for thought for anyone considering PC gaming.
Older releases get buried under new releases while cult and pop classics make it through the ages just like in every other media? Shocker.
Does anybody here own every game on Steam?
Only 7000? I expected more honestly.
Discovery via the interface is bad in just about every media or software store I've experienced. Recommendations are usually overspecific and bad at surfacing things you might not have thought to look for (but would also enjoy). I don't know how to fix this. Culling titles is not the answer.
Only 7000? I expected more honestly.
Wading through all those games to get what you want...when you go to a store do you wade through everything no matter how big the store is?
arent there like 30 million users?
get rid of some of them. there's too many.
I thought this was what GAF wanted? When Valve did moderate content, everyone were angry at them for doing so. Every developer who had difficulties getting on Steam, and/or had a game plainly rejected, got sympathy from people everytime it was mentioned in a thread, and people were asking who Valve thought they were, not letting Game X on Steam.
Only 7000? I expected more honestly.
Do you feel like Valve has the responsibility to do something about it? Do you think things are fine the way they are? I don't want the storefront to end up like the mobile market where only a very few games end up getting the majority of the profits and some fantastic games end up being lost in the mob of games.
Yeah Ps2 alone had much more.
But very respectable numbers anyway.
Yeah Ps2 alone had much more.
But very respectable numbers anyway.
No it didn't. This is wildly incorrect .Yeah Ps2 alone had much more.
But very respectable numbers anyway.
They just need better showcases for games and Curators ARE NOT it
120M according to Steamspy guy when he did some blog post awhile back.wasnt it more like 135M?
Do people ask the same of books? "How much is too much"?