Hournda said:
Secondly, the bad things. He did take a lot of cheap shots at George Bush and the Republicans which unless you're a real anti-Bush guy are kind of a turn off. I mean if you had a camera on you 24 hours a day I'm sure you'd do a ton of goofy things that would get caught on camera. The editing in the Iraq segments was kind of shady. The movie seems to imply that Iraq wasn't run by a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people. Another scene that stuck out was the one where they raided the house and the editors of the movie made selective use of subtitles. You don't get to see subtitles of what they're saying until the people say something like "Why are you here? What are you doing? He's innocent!" but you don't get to see the subtitles of the army people who are probably saying something like "We're looking for terrorists."
But overall I thought it was entertaining and effective propaganda. The movie also seemed to work as a case study on how "money makes the world go round" and "it's not what you know, but who you know." And if you take a step back and look at the movie from the perspective of someone who never heard of the US, you get a rather scary picture of a militaristic society attempting to create an empire in order to keep the elites of the country in power.
But the main flaw in the film is that it basically comes to the conclusion that George Bush is an incompetant, corrupt and immoral man only looking out for himself and his friends as he is also simultaneously the leader of the free world. I doubt that's true and that's the propagandistic nature of the film, but it is still a very effective film that at least brings all this to the table.
To the scene where they invaded the house: Isn't that one of the main points of the movie? We are in another country for suspect reasons (which is a huge point often overlooked in the name of terrorism), occupying the country, invading people's privacy. Moore does a great job getting points across. What the hell would we do if somebody did that to us? We get all pissy when our own police come into our house without reason. Yet we are in Iraq, for quite a few wrong reasons, looking for terrorists. If the police in the US come into your house, find drugs and lock you in jail but failed to get a search warrant or had no reasonable suspicion that you had drugs, they would throw out the case. And it would be the right thing to do. Now, we are in Iraq, for what now is the wrong reason. Our search warrant (WMD) was based on bad info, beriddled with bias and suspect info (the CIA even believed that). And now, in the name of terrorism, we are still waging a war. Shouldn't we follow our the same rules?
Oh, and I don't see it as a flaw as bringing to light, some of the President's misteps, biases and incompetencies. And I would think propaganda is based on falsehoods. When somebody starts to debunk the major points of the movie (bush has plenty of influences that might color his decisions), then it can be called propagands./end rant
I just saw the movie and thought it was great. Eyeopening is what I really think about it. As a film, Moore's personal goals sometimes overshadow what can be described as a better device: Letting other people talk. The best part about this film and Bowling for Columbine is when he lets other people talk and allows me to make my own judgements. Every heartbreaking or comedic or awe/shocking moment is exclusively when others are speaking, not Moore. There are plenty of them, particularly when Bush speaks. It's like you couldn't make this up and have a better effect.
'Fool me once, shame on......uh......shame on.....uh....me....*long pause*don't fool me again.' Words could not describe my emotions then. And to wrap the film up with that quote by Bush, while showing pictures of Bush Sr. and Jr. of course highlights the political slant of Moore but you would be ignoring the main point of the film. We've been duped on the highest order with consequences too often ignored. I give no credit to any person that participates in terrorism. But we are only providing fuel to the fire by invading Iraq with fabricated or vague information.
This movie provides a great alternate version of the incomprehensible motives of our leader. It does a great job of portraying the events of the past few years and as a documentary, shows those same viewpoints from different perspectives. Over the past month, I've seen two great documentaries: Bowling for Columbine and the one about the Rosenburgs. At the end of the one on the Rosenburgs, the director makes a comment how her documentary was about taking control of her life and history; one that was previously marred by shame and charges of treason had been successfully altered by her documentary and search into her family's past into a future of pride, strength and dignity. Well, Moore kinda succeeded, to me, in turning the story around. I would love to see any real debunking of his facts. Only because I hope the movie stands up against the onslaught that is sure to come.
Great movie and I recommend it. Also, 'Heir To An Execution', the movie on the Rosenburg's was great to. It's on HBO nowawdays.