This thread is for stupid GAMING questions that don't deserve their own thread

I have three stupid questions right now (but I can do better, I'm good for stupid).

1/ Is there a video game site that does a good job at listing future release dates ?
Gamekult (french) had a good section about it but recently redesigned it and throw every good things (EU/US/JAP dates for example) down the drain.
Gamespot seems really poor and IGN, well I must go check it, last time it wasn't exceptional.
With the amount of dates thrown recently, I need a site which does its fucking job...

2/ Let's say I live in europe and want to import a 3DS. What is my best option ?
- Amazon third party sellers have good prices but international shipping is not a given (on some models it is a no-go, on others it isn't specified).
- Playasia is outrageously funny in their vision of pricing.
- Videogamesplus is pricier than Amazon but well respected. Problem is I would like to avoid a long transit even if it means paying more, and VG+ doesn't mention an express service option as far as I can tell

3/ And a last one, very stupid but better safe than sorry : 3DS sold in Canada are indeed 100% like the US ones ?
 
Three quick Wii U questions from someone who just decided to buy one:

Is there any reason to buy a Pro Controller if I still have a Wii Classic Controller Pro? Are they different in any way, does the CCP work with Wii U games etc. I am getting the system for Monster Hunter...I originally bought the CCP for MH Tri. And only ever used it for that. There's a Zombi U bundle out here in Canada now that comes with the game and a pro controller, so either way I might end up with one.

Second, I read there's a headphone port on the gamepad. This is for game audio as well as voice chat etc right? I can play MH with my headphones via this and chat with people with the gamepad mic? I heard the Wii U doesn't have an optical out which kind of baffled me, but I've already got my 360 taking up the optical in on my headphone amp anyways. So if I can just plug some headphones into the gamepad that's fine.

Finally can I put my Tri save from my old Wii onto the Wii U's memory? My old Wii is pretty busted and I wouldn't mind playing a bit of my old save since I still have Tri lying around. From what I understand I can't import anything from it to Tri Ultimate anyways so no big deal.
 
Three quick Wii U questions from someone who just decided to buy one:

Is there any reason to buy a Pro Controller if I still have a Wii Classic Controller Pro? Are they different in any way, does the CCP work with Wii U games etc. I am getting the system for Monster Hunter...I originally bought the CCP for MH Tri. And only ever used it for that. There's a Zombi U bundle out here in Canada now that comes with the game and a pro controller, so either way I might end up with one.

Second, I read there's a headphone port on the gamepad. This is for game audio as well as voice chat etc right? I can play MH with my headphones via this and chat with people with the gamepad mic? I heard the Wii U doesn't have an optical out which kind of baffled me, but I've already got my 360 taking up the optical in on my headphone amp anyways. So if I can just plug some headphones into the gamepad that's fine.

Finally can I put my Tri save from my old Wii onto the Wii U's memory? My old Wii is pretty busted and I wouldn't mind playing a bit of my old save since I still have Tri lying around. From what I understand I can't import anything from it to Tri Ultimate anyways so no big deal.

1. I imagine that down the line, the Wii U Pro might be supported more than the Classic. For Monster Hunter, I think you're ok though.

2. Yes.

3. Yes.
 
Are the DS and 3DS eShops (or whatever they're called) the same?

Did the DS even have an eShop?

I have three stupid questions right now (but I can do better, I'm good for stupid).

1/ Is there a video game site that does a good job at listing future release dates ?

I use Wikipedia primarily. It isn't perfect or complete, but I've found it to be much better than any other alternative.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_in_video_gaming
 
Some questions I dread asking about my launch PS3 - it was a 60GB model; it suffered from overheating early on and failed, I sent it in and Sony replaced it (years ago). When it came back, I put in a 300GB hard drive.

Ever since then, the replacement console has worked fine, though the hard drive has always made a loud noise on startup.

A few weeks ago, playing the MGS:R demo (from the ZoE HD release), the game would stutter in cutscenes. (I have another PS3 in another room that does not have this problem.)

This weekend I decided to download several games previously purchased on PSN. I queued the downloads and left them to run.

Later, when I came back, it still wasn't done. The final game was still downloading - or so it said, though it was no longer increasing in file size. When I tried to install the games that had downloaded, bad things started happening. For the first, it took ages to reach the 1% point on the install - a few percentage points later, the download failed. I tried a few others, most of them failed immediately. One or two would start the install, then fail. One or two small PS1 games installed correctly.

Anyone ever seen behavior like this? I am wondering if the hard drive is failing, but don't want to go through the hassle & expense of replacing the hard drive only to find out it's something more fundamental that's wrong.
 
Later, when I came back, it still wasn't done. The final game was still downloading - or so it said, though it was no longer increasing in file size. When I tried to install the games that had downloaded, bad things started happening. For the first, it took ages to reach the 1% point on the install - a few percentage points later, the download failed. I tried a few others, most of them failed immediately. One or two would start the install, then fail. One or two small PS1 games installed correctly.

Anyone ever seen behavior like this? I am wondering if the hard drive is failing, but don't want to go through the hassle & expense of replacing the hard drive only to find out it's something more fundamental that's wrong.

Lately, I have been getting an error (80029564) when attempting to install downloaded games. The games download 100% then fail between 10-14% during the install. Restarting my router before downloading games has "solved" this issue (the games install but I do not know what problem I have corrected), though this method failed to work when attempting to download the MGR demo (3.4GB is quite large).

I can only suggest downloading games one at a time and restarting your router before you do (this is assuming you have your console wirelessly connected to the internet).
 
I can only suggest downloading games one at a time and restarting your router before you do (this is assuming you have your console wirelessly connected to the internet).

No, it's a direct wired connection to the router. I'll try a new download and see if it's able to download at all.
 
has anybody been playing black ops 2 in the past four hours on playstation 3?

just want to know whether the servers are busted and the status on there website is incorrect or if its just busted

its not my internet as i have tried other games online and they work fine

thanks
 
I was gonna make another thread but decided not to.

So i just posted here

Fuck graphic whorism was the title.
This will bring down the industry. People should be asking about what new kind of games are there what is new thing that the game is doing instead

look at that fucking tree in the background.

lol at the texture of hair.

I expect quality, i expect game to look good as well but the extremeness of it and the only judgement category for the games seem so sad. I personally can't pick a difference between anything. I do know that there are people who are very sensitive about the graphics.

I do fear that industry as whole is placing too much emphasis on graphics but not on game play. The budget will keep getting higher and will lead to game studio closer if one game flops. Check out some of the examples. I do know that team of 3 can create amazing games as well but this is not about that.

Affordability is not someone thinks about when it comes to gaming. If you are first world country you are set probably but what about the rest of the world. Gaming as whole if needs to be famous it needs to be affordable. PC is not the answer the reason it is expensive as well and the primary purpose of most of the affordable pc in developing nation is not gaming plus piracy like it or not is the biggest on PC.

I am not against big budget gaming. I am not against improving.

I am against graphics being primary and most of the time only thing important for game industry as whole. If the game looks good and does the same thing that other game that looked good as well what is the benefit? indie games are great hope we will get more of them.

People will attack saying so should we stop expecting better things? should game stop progressing? No is the answer. The graphic whorism is what is wrong and I wanted to speak out against.

Gaming needs to back to its root. It needs to be affordable. It needs to be accessible and simple at a same time.I am not against hardcore gamer or something. I do not think thread will go well but wanted to say it. probably did not say it proper way but i hope there are others like me or probably just me. Sorry for crazyness.
 
Fuck graphic whorism
Video games are audiovisual experiences. Having great graphics is obviously an important part of that. That doesn't mean it has to be expensive to make. There are plenty of smaller teams that make beautiful games on a low budget and it doesn't matter how much money you throw at a project that has poor art to begin with.

PC is not the answer the reason it is expensive
This is just flat out wrong. There are plenty of PC games that doesn't require powerful and expensive components. Take a look at Good Old Games if you want to play amazing games and don't care about having the latest graphics. Also new popular games like The Binding of Isaac, FTL: Faster than Light, and Minecraft run fine on old machines.

I am against graphics being primary and most of the time only thing important for game industry as whole.
It's not and it never has been. Games like Crysis and Metro 2033 doesn't outsell popular less graphically intensive titles.

Are you still a Wii only gamer? I think you would discover that there are plenty of creative games on other platforms if you just gave them a chance.
 
So who else is already sick and tired of seeing GDDR5 plastered in every single ps4 and xbox thread?
You'll stop giving a shit when you realize that there's nothing of any value whatsoever being discussed in all the PS threads right now. Just, uh... Do something productive until next year or so, I guess.

I realize this is ultimately a useless answer in itself, but if you haven't already been skimming and skipping the majority of posts here you're doing it wrong.
 
You'll stop giving a shit when you realize that there's nothing of any value whatsoever being discussed in all the PS threads right now. Just, uh... Do something productive until next year or so, I guess.

I realize this is ultimately a useless answer in itself, but if you haven't already been skimming and skipping the majority of posts here you're doing it wrong.

I'm more on the OT side but I swing over every now and then. You are very correct.
 
Thread whining will just get you banned. People are excited for new news and the 8GB GDDR5 announcement was the most interesting part for many from Sony's conference. I'm sure they will move on to something else once we learn more about the next-gen consoles. Personally I'd love to learn more about the OS, the slidepad, emulation of prior consoles, and the new streaming features.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3_hardware
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_hardware

I'm more on the OT side but I swing over every now and then. You are very correct.
I try to not be cynical about it, because in the end, the situation is much more akin to sitting in a filled stadium. I think at this point the place would benefit from a threaded view. It would make it easier to both scroll past what you don't care about and actually follow conversations that you do care about.
 
Video games are audiovisual experiences. Having great graphics is obviously an important part of that. That doesn't mean it has to be expensive to make. There are plenty of smaller teams that make beautiful games on a low budget and it doesn't matter how much money you throw at a project that has poor art to begin with.

This is just flat out wrong. There are plenty of PC games that doesn't require powerful and expensive components. Take a look at Good Old Games if you want to play amazing games and don't care about having the latest graphics. Also new popular games like The Binding of Isaac, FTL: Faster than Light, and Minecraft run fine on old machines.

It's not and it never has been. Games like Crysis and Metro 2033 doesn't outsell popular less graphically intensive titles.

Are you still a Wii only gamer? I think you would discover that there are plenty of creative games on other platforms if you just gave them a chance.

thanks for answering. No i actually bought ps3 last month. I did not create the thread because i seem like only one who is afraid that more focus on graphics will lead to death of more studios due to crazy budget and expectations.
Honestly i played uc3 but i did not pay attention to graphics at all so you know what i mean. PC are expensive to own in third world country is what i was talking about and gaming is afterthought when computers are involved. Pc is still way to go if you want your game to be played by millions provided it is accessible.
 
Does Sony have a costumer service/support email? I can't find anything in their shitty site, and I don't have a phone available right now, so I can't call them.
 
thanks for answering. No i actually bought ps3 last month. I did not create the thread because i seem like only one who is afraid that more focus on graphics will lead to death of more studios due to crazy budget and expectations.
Honestly i played uc3 but i did not pay attention to graphics at all so you know what i mean. PC are expensive to own in third world country is what i was talking about and gaming is afterthought when computers are involved. Pc is still way to go if you want your game to be played by millions provided it is accessible.
I'm not a big fan of the Uncharted series myself. You should try some of the smaller PSN games. Flower, Super Stardust HD, and Pixeljunk Eden look amazing and their budgets are tiny compared to AAA titles. That's what I like about having really powerful hardware. With easy-to-use engines like Unity even single person projects can be impressive-looking by just utilizing all the built-in features.
Does Sony have a costumer service/support email? I can't find anything in their shitty site, and I don't have a phone available right now, so I can't call them.
What region are you in?
 
I want to cheat with F-Zero: Maximum Velocity on the GBA via the 3DS Ambassador games to unlock the hidden tracks.

I have found a code listed on numerous sites that says to push B, L, B, A, R, B(2), A(2) at the title screen.

For the life of me, I cannot get it to work; does anyone have any ideas? Surely cheat codes should still apply to the ambassador games, as they are straight rom dumps. Does anyone know what I could be doing wrong?

Cheers.
 
Bit of a discussion question. Didn't think this warranted it's own thread.

Just wanting some opinions series of games and jumping in late in the cycle. For example, Assassin's Creed 3 looks really fun and from what I have seen of it the graphics are a pleasure. However I have not played any Assassin's before so I have the dilemma of do I go back and start from the beginning to get the full story or is it ok to skip them and just jump straight into 3?

Another example is The Witcher 2. Another game I have been wanting to play for some time. Again, I have not played number 1. I feel like in these situations I have to play them from the beginning to get the story. This causes me to just continuously put them off until I have lots of time.
 
Bit of a discussion question. Didn't think this warranted it's own thread.

Just wanting some opinions series of games and jumping in late in the cycle. For example, Assassin's Creed 3 looks really fun and from what I have seen of it the graphics are a pleasure. However I have not played any Assassin's before so I have the dilemma of do I go back and start from the beginning to get the full story or is it ok to skip them and just jump straight into 3?

It is absolutely worth it to play 2/Brotherhood/Revelations before 3, if only because they're amazing games. AC3 is a serviceable game that is unfortunately buggy as hell.
 
Just wanting some opinions series of games and jumping in late in the cycle. For example, Assassin's Creed 3 looks really fun and from what I have seen of it the graphics are a pleasure. However I have not played any Assassin's before so I have the dilemma of do I go back and start from the beginning to get the full story or is it ok to skip them and just jump straight into 3?

I'm also a stickler for playing series in order, as it happens.

AC's an interesting situation. There's four viable start points, as far as I can see... which is impressive, given that there's only five games in the series.

Starting with AC3... I wouldn't advise. There's an arching plot covering all games that you'd be jumping in at the tail end of. While people have different opinions over whether that plot is particularly worthwhile, it's worth mentioning that there's lots of allusions and references to previous titles in the series; it really does feel like a climax that pulls lots of previous parts of the storyline together, and jumping in at that point, you're not going to get that effect.

What about going all the way to the other end, with AC1? You get some nice buildup of mystery - and of course you get the entire story from the beginning - although in terms of the arc story, the events are largely scene-setting. But there's a very big issue: AC1 isn't actually a particularly enjoyable game. Now, I need to shower that in caveats; there are some people who adore it and swear by it, particularly playing it deliberately without the HUD (which is certainly doable, although it requires some suspension if disbelief for just how Altair gets some information if the HUD isn't available!) - but for me, the game is weak and repetitive... although *despite* the repetitiveness, I feel obliged to point out that I was still compelled to 1000/1000 it; I *liked* it despite the tedium, oddly!

So if you don't go for the beginning or the end, you've gotta go somewhere in the middle, right? AC2 is *tons* better than the first, for me. The protaganist was likable, the game had a reasonable variety of actions, the arc storyline kicks into gear. In gameplay terms, it's a great jumping-in point. In story terms, it's a great jumping in point. In short, it's a great jumping-in point... except for the fact that there are one or two little plot moments that are actually unexpected and will mean a whole lot more to you if you've played the first game. Playing 2 without playing 1 misses out on those little bits of nuance.

The final possible jump-in point I'd suggest is Brotherhood, although there's a caveat; it's a bad place to jump in for story. Lots of things won't make sense, there's - again - a couple of nice things which you won't appreciate if you haven't played 2. Why's it a valid jumping-in point, then? Because I think it's got the best *gameplay* of the entire series so far. A restrained level of scale, a huge variety of things to do, the polish from the previous titles - and of course the introduction of the multiplayer component, which I rather enjoyed even though I'm not much of a multiplayer kind of guy.


So, yes, there's four options. Revelations is out; not a good jumping-in place for the story and the gameplay isn't quite up to the earlier titles. To help you narrow it down further, I'd say to play AC1 if you can do it in a controlled fashion so you don't get narked by the repetitiveness - it'll help to not be achievement-obsessive in that regard! If you do the bare minimum it won't be quite as painful. If you think that you won't like doing it that way, then I'd suggest going from AC2.
 
Anyone know if there is a way to tell if you've used a giftcard on Gamestop.com orders? I almost canceled one last night not thinking, and I see no way to actually tell, not even in the email receipt.
 
Thanks for the replies above. I will start from number 1. If I find myself getting bored of playing I can switch to Sleeping Dogs for a while and vice versa. If I can't even enjoy that I will take your advice and just move onto number 2.

Somehow, I doubt I will ever be able to get past this "need" to play from the very beginning. I hate not knowing things, I hate knowing I could be missing something. I guess I was just trying to see if anyone else felt the same way/suffered from the same thing.

I do like that alot of games these days release with a "Previously in X" video somewhere in the menu. Perhaps I can find something like this for The Witcher as everyone I speak too says The Witcher 2 is a far better game.
 
If everything in Mortal Kombat is spelled with a 'K' instead of a 'C', then should Cyrax really be 'Kyrax'?

i think the rule is generally if its a harsh c at the start of something it becomes a k

eg. kombat

while cyrax is a name with a soft c its a si sound rather than a k sound

the real answer is that its just arbitrary

edit: i'm an idiot totally just quoted the bottom of the first page, dayum son
 
Thanks for the replies above. I will start from number 1. If I find myself getting bored of playing I can switch to Sleeping Dogs for a while and vice versa. If I can't even enjoy that I will take your advice and just move onto number 2.

Somehow, I doubt I will ever be able to get past this "need" to play from the very beginning. I hate not knowing things, I hate knowing I could be missing something. I guess I was just trying to see if anyone else felt the same way/suffered from the same thing.

As I said, I do. From me it's not just a plot thing, though, but also an academic interest in the way a given game series evolves over time (hence why I've even been a stickler for the mainline FF titles!)

I do like that alot of games these days release with a "Previously in X" video somewhere in the menu. Perhaps I can find something like this for The Witcher as everyone I speak too says The Witcher 2 is a far better game.

Well, all I can help you with there is to say that I liked The Witcher, but haven't played 2. Unhelpful!
 
The PC version was technically great and it's discounted regularly on Steam. That's probably the better option if you have a decent PC and a controller. You could always use your PS3 controller with Motioninjoy if you don't have anything else.
 
I just bought some MS points to buy some DLC priced at 560, and with the remaining points in my account (130) + 400($5) I'm 30 fucking points down and I just realized it.

What does GAF do in times like these? FUCKING PURCHASE AMMOUTS/DLC PRICES.
 
i have posted this query in the steam thread but thought here might be also a good place to go

so steam is infuriating me, team fortress 2 specifically

everytime i launch steam or tf2 it pops up a little window saying validating cache files,

once the progress bar reaches 100% the window does not go away

i've tried defragmenting the cache files this window does the same

i have also tried uninstalling and reinstalling the game however this only stops the problem for a short while

would really welcome any advice you can throw my way

thanks
 
If I can buy stuff from Google Play, Apple App Store and Steam without resorting to having to setup a fake account.... (all these services support my country and most in the world), why are Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft incapable of making their online stores available to everyone?

Am I missing something here?
 
I'd like to get my 360 online. Is there a reliable wired-to-wireless bridge out there that is less expensive than the $50 official wireless adapter?

I don't have a laptop/extra computer lying around to bridge the connections via PC and have no extra networking equipment.

(...I seem to remember the official adapter being way more than $50 the last time I tried to find an alternative.)
 
which game i should buy today, Far Cry 3 or Borderlands 2 ?

i like both games, i finished borderlands 1 (DLC included) a week ago, was pretty good,
i'm definitely going to buy BL2 some day, but after watching Far Cry 3: Giant Bomb Quick Look, the game looks pretty slick and fun.

also, FC3 is $50 and BL2 $60, both on steam.

what say you GAF ?
 
which game i should buy today, Far Cry 3 or Borderlands 2 ?

i like both games, i finished borderlands 1 (DLC included) a week ago, was pretty good,
i'm definitely going to buy BL2 some day, but after watching Far Cry 3: Giant Bomb Quick Look, the game looks pretty slick and fun.

also, FC3 is $50 and BL2 $60, both on steam.

what say you GAF ?

i go for farcry 3 myself

borderlands 2 is exactly that its more borderlands

whilst far cry 3, damn dunno where to start, its pretty awesome, other than the free roaming aspect and the solid shooting and stealth, it does some really interesting things with your perception of what is going on in the world, whether you can trust what you see or not, mainly because of hallucinogens, i even remember being unsure of whether or not i had killed a specific character for about an hour afterwards

there is also a very cool dances with wolves, the beach and apocalypse now kind of vibe

yeah some of the boss character fights are patchy and the last quarter loses it a bit, but man when that game is good its incredible, which the majority of it is

also its ten dollars cheaper

feel free to ask for more specific info if you want, just keeping it kinda vague atm if you don't wanna know too much
 
what about the Multiplayer? has the typical kind of games modes? (FFA, TDM, capture the flag etc)

i personally didn't touch much of the multiplayer so i'm not sure, onyl looked at the coop which is fine i guess, i didn't check the competitive,

to be honest, i'm not a massive fan of multiplayer in general, on occasion but i get burnt out quite fast and i was playing the crysis 3 beta at the time, so i'm probably not the best person to ask

sorry i couldn't help on this part
 
Why Denryu isnt a dragon type pokemon ?

"Denryu can be taken to mean 電流 denryū (electric current) or 電竜 denryū (electric dragon), and it may incorporate 電球 denkyū (light bulb), referring to its tail."

(The Pokemon in question is Ampharos, for those curious.)
 
Top Bottom