I know a few people who know and have worked with him and they say he's a real cunt behind closed doors. Not in a Weinstein or Polanski way or anything, just an unchecked ego and treating others with disrespect.
You heard it here first folks, Zack Snyder is the Macklemore of directors.
It's true though. BVS gave a pretty accurate depiction of how the media can be used to distort a narrative for one. CW has Captain America reminded that he brought down helicarriers on a city and when reminded of this pretty much says "yeah but fuck you"
Edit: With reghards to the deconstructionist nature and Tolkien as a comparison. Look at what GRRM said about
Tolkien
or
Ruling is hard. This was maybe my answer to Tolkien, whom, as much as I admire him, I do quibble with. Lord of the Rings had a very medieval philosophy: that if the king was a good man, the land would prosper. We look at real history and it's not that simple. Tolkien can say that Aragorn became king and reigned for a hundred years, and he was wise and good. But Tolkien doesn't ask the question: What was Aragorn's tax policy? Did he maintain a standing army? What did he do in times of flood and famine? And what about all these orcs? By the end of the war, Sauron is gone but all of the orcs aren't gone – they're in the mountains. Did Aragorn pursue a policy of systematic genocide and kill them? Even the little baby orcs, in their little orc cradles?
The war that Tolkien wrote about was a war for the fate of civilization and the future of humanity, and that's become the template. I'm not sure that it's a good template, though. The Tolkien model led generations of fantasy writers to produce these endless series of dark lords and their evil minions who are all very ugly and wear black clothes. But the vast majority of wars throughout history are not like that.
https://www.tolkiensociety.org/2014/04/grrm-asks-what-was-aragorns-tax-policy/
DCEU according to peopl in this thread take a more GRRM approach to cinematic universes. Marvel a more Tolkien. Marvel would have you believe only 74 people died in NYC (yeah right) that is depending on whether they can keep their story straight
http://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Battle_of_New_York#cite_note-CACW-2
Meanwhile in the DCEU there is no BS that that many many people will die when these uper powered beings fight.
In the MCU, the Norse god of thunder exists and no one barely brings it up that the vikings got it right with religion, in the DCEU it's the day the world was introduced to the Superman
In the MCU Captain America is the best Superhero because when he is reminded of collateral damage he is directly responsible for that
kills 1000s he shrugs the criticism off (don't tell me that falling spaceships that break open a dam aren't going to kill many many people ., Superman however is mopey or introspective/pensive if you're not a jackass at his actions where he is accused of causing like a dozen deaths tops indirectly. But i get it, a few deaths are a tragedy whilst 1000s are a statistic
But then again, comic book fan boys can be the worst when they tie themselves into knots to make logical shit not make sense. They can swear up and down the ending to Watchmen movie makes no sense after all "why would the world come together in defence of the US when many countries were attacked by hat is scene as a product of the US's actions, they'd tell the US to fuck off" if a common argument by Watchmen detractors. This is despite the fact the only time when article 5 was invoked, basically an attack on one of us is an attack on all of us, was due to an incredible unforeseen attack on NYC (9/11), where the guy who the US helped bring to prominence attacked the US. I didn't see much discussion of chickens coming home to roost then. I can also add that there is a word for putting pragmatism before ideology, it's called realpolitik and the world wold wanna get really pragmatic about a big, blue menace real quick regardless of it's the US's fault or not. I guess some people really wanna see giant alien squids.