BruiserBear
Banned
This game has the most insultingly short trial I've ever seen.
To be fair, it's still enough for anyone to decide on a purchase. This is how it plays, and this is how it looks. Do you want more or not?
This game has the most insultingly short trial I've ever seen.
That certainly seems true from everything I have seen of the game.Robomodo has managed to make these once-vibrant levels look like they are the skate park near Gear of War’s
They don't even let you finish a single session which is 5 minutes. Ridiculous.To be fair, it's still enough for anyone to decide on a purchase. This is how it plays, and this is how it looks. Do you want more or not?
That demo was ridiculously short. Will have to wait for the disc based PS3 version, unless there's a cheap adapter to use a USB pad on 360.
Who, Destructoid or Robomodo?A chance for redemption ad they blew it..
That certainly seems true from everything I have seen of the game.
He hit the nail on the head when he said that it was very apparent that this wasn't Neversoft working on the game.
Anyone else feel they can't land specials with any degree of regularity? I was just playing 2X and was stringing together long combos with no issue. Feel like it's random whether it recognizes an input for specials.
Half of the damn scale is for "broken games"? You're why scores are so inflated.Haha a 4.5 out of 10?
I ritually don't complain about scores but that is ridiculous. That's "broken game" territory and the game is no where near that.
.
Press left/right at the level select screen to switch between SP modes.Lack of single player modes (it seems you ONLY have the main game no free skate or anything unless i missed something) and lack of customization sucks.
Haha a 4.5 out of 10?
I usually don't complain about scores but that is ridiculous. That's "broken game" territory
Half of the damn scale is for "broken games"? You're why scores are so inflated.
Half of the damn scale is for "broken games"? You're why scores are so inflated.
This game has the most insultingly short trial I've ever seen.
No. It's below average territory.
They even explain what a 4.5 means:Half of the damn scale is for "broken games"? You're why scores are so inflated.
Subpar: 4.5s have some high points, but they soon give way to glaring faults. Not the worst games, but are difficult to recommend to everyone who isn't already a huge fan of this genre or brand.
1 and 2 didn't have customization, right? Besides, this game's got far more issues than not being able to change the sneakers on your skater
They even explain what a 4.5 means:
This game is also missing splitscreen, which personally makes it worthless to me.1 and 2 didn't have customization, right? Besides, this game's got far more issues than not being able to change the sneakers on your skater
Their explanation is irrelevant if it's not actually followed. See, the average score handed out by Destructoid is a 71. Hence, regardless of what they see, "average" on Destructoid means 70-ish, so a 4.5 isn't just "sub-par", but far, far below average.
Reading Destructoid's review, I'm gonna have to agree somewhat with the 4.5 score. What I played of the demo seems in line with their review.
But the first THPS was pretty sluggish when you started off and the game was also pretty dark/dull looking as well.
Still don't get some of the complaints to be honest. Seems like a case of nostalgia when it comes to some of the complaints.
no.
no.
no.
the two 'averages' are not the same thing. the average score destructoid give out is meaningless unless they review every single game, or at the very least, a randomly selected cross section of games.
they do not do either of those, as most review places do not. shovelware titles are real, and shit, and considered when we talk about the 'average' quality of a game. most review sites as we expect focus on the bigger titles, and these bigger titles are quite logically going to be above average quality.
that destructoid have an average of 70 ish tells us more about the kind of games they review, and it doesn't contradict their review scale at all.
But the first THPS was pretty sluggish when you started off and the game was also pretty dark/dull looking as well.
Still don't get some of the complaints to be honest. Seems like a case of nostalgia when it comes to some of the complaints.
Second game improved a lot on that. 2x for the xbox seems like a better game than this.But the first THPS was pretty sluggish when you started off and the game was also pretty dark/dull looking as well.
Still don't get some of the complaints to be honest. Seems like a case of nostalgia when it comes to some of the complaints.
I was interested until I heard that. Surprised by it really. I've burned through these levels so going back single player probably wouldn't do much for me, but playing against a friend on the same couch would have been worth $15.You're wasting your time. At this point people are posting just to pile on. Even people who claim to have no interest in the game due to no spliscreen are back in the thread today.
You're wasting your time. At this point people are posting just to pile on. Even people who claim to have no interest in the game due to no spliscreen are back in the thread today.
Damn, I don't like the way this controls at all from just playing the trial. I've always played the Tony Hawk games on PS1, PS2, PSP and DS using the D-pad exclusively. So is the trouble I'm having with the game just the 360 controller or is the game's controls just poorly designed?
jeez can't a guy have an opinion
But the first THPS was pretty sluggish when you started off and the game was also pretty dark/dull looking as well.
Still don't get some of the complaints to be honest. Seems like a case of nostalgia when it comes to some of the complaints.
You're wasting your time. At this point people are posting just to pile on. Even people who claim to have no interest in the game due to no spliscreen are back in the thread today.
it doesn't need to make up the lionshare to significantly effect the average, espescially when the titles that *aren't* being reviewed are of noticeably poorer quality than the ones that are, as is the case here.This argument might hold water on iOS or Android (and perhaps the Wii), but on the Xbox 360 or PS3? Hardly. There is no doubt that shovelware exists, but it does not make up the lions share of games on these major consoles. Rather, titles by major publishers make up the bulk of gams on those systems, and yes, the bulk of these are reviewed by these major sites. Even if shovelware games were routinely reviewed by major sites, I doubt they'd be numerous enough to decrease the average score on any major gaming site to a 5. For better or worse, the average game on major sites scores about 7, and no amount of wishful thinking will change that.
Hold A while falling."BIG DROP"
I really am starting to hate that...
As long as the PC version will run at 60 FPS I'm still in.