Am I the only one still being freaked about an entire franchise being hinged on the idea that mass murder is ok for so long it brings something in value to franchises' surviving characters?
I'm not, but that is mostly because that doesn't remotely fit with what I have seen or read. (it's about the idea of having to survive a fantasy RPG with death stakes, and then after that it's about making money while being entertaining to some degree
money thing aside though the franchise is about the idea of how VR could be abused and cause problems whether it is trapping people in a game for an experiments, or abusing people's unawareness to commit crimes ect)
At no point in my reading of the books (part of the way through book 5 which is the start of season 2) and not in my memory of the anime (which is a lot fuzzier as I just read the books in the last month
thus if the hero stuff happens in the second season I am not caught back up there.) do I recall people being okay with what went on. They try to focus on the positives from it, but not because they think what happened was okay, but because that is a normal way to handle bad things. (even if I am forgetting something any positive feelings towards the mass murder can easily be explained away via Stockholm syndrome and thus not a big deal to me at all)
really though if you wanted you could treat the entire franchise as just the first half of the first season, as that was all he originally meant to make of the series. The rest was just made because it was popular and he had more ideas. Heck the only reason kirito has a harem is because the writer is bad at focusing on not kirito, he says so in book 2 which is where all the extra girls come from lol.
granted... I actually like SAO