So because this was intended for a teenage audience I can't comment on it with a critical eye as an adult? Does that suddenly make my criticism less valid for some reason? It doesn't matter who the intended audience was in Japan; I'm looking at this from the cultural perspective of an American which is fine considering this is going to air on ADULT swim.
this is always a weird defense because it basically says it's totally fine for grown-ass men to draw sexy pictures of teenage girls because they intend for most of their audience to be teenagers.
I don't think (or I at least hope) Bass was saying such shows were above reproach but he was just explaining WHY the characters tend to be teenagers. The same reason why Naruto, Bleach, One Piece, My Hero Academia, Twilight, Hunger Games, Harry Potter, etc. all star teenager characters. They are made to be primarily consumed by teenagers so the main characters are teenagers. That's all he was saying (to my understanding).
Fanservice can have purpose. Just watch Me!Me!Me!
Outside of that, I can easily ignore it if I like other stuff in the work. No Game No Life is a great series, but it has some damn questionable fanservice at points.
A) Me!Me!Me! is one of the most fanservice ladden things I've seen in some while but it wouldn't work if it wasn't a boob-a-palooza. It's actually quite good. I suggest people go see it if they haven't already. It's NSFW though. Also be sure to watch the other Animator Expo shorts as well. Most of them are EXCELLENT!
B) NGNL seemed like a show that might be fun with its referential humor and stuff but when I heard there were 11 year old panty shots I decided to not even bother watching the show. There were too many good anime/cartoons in 2014 for me to waste a time with a show that at best would be "If you ignore this, its really good". I may have missed out but so be it :/