then again i'm one of those weirdos on this site that likes the human aspect of kaiju movies and doesn't need 2 hours of non stop monster to make a film good.
The biggest mystery in that trailer is . . . who the hell is she planning to send that selfie to!!!!
Use a dns UK France and BrazilI've never seen Cloverfield but always wanted to. Wish it was on Netflix.
Looked to me like she was trying to get service.
Humans are the true monsters in Cloverfield iirc.John Goodman is the monster this time?
The biggest mystery in that trailer is . . . who the hell is she planning to send that selfie to!!!!
My prediction: The movie will lead us to think that John Goodman is crazy and keeping her in the shelter in some kind of deception and so we expect that twist when she looks outside the window...but the real double-twist will be that the world is in fact mostly destroyed by monsters.
Also this movie had nothing to do with Cloverfield until reshoots happened last year, which makes me believe my twist idea.
Also this movie had nothing to do with Cloverfield until reshoots happened last year, which makes me believe my twist idea.
My prediction: The movie will lead us to think that John Goodman is crazy and keeping her in the shelter in some kind of deception and so we expect that twist when she looks outside the window...but the real double-twist will be that the world is in fact mostly destroyed by monsters.
Also this movie had nothing to do with Cloverfield until reshoots happened last year, which makes me believe my twist idea.
Abrams is saying it became a Cloverfield movie at the beginning of production.
The idea that the "Valencia" script got overhauled to become a Cloverfield movie isn't very far-fetched at all. It's happened before. You've probably even liked one or two of the movies that's happened to.
People seem very protective of people's expectations without fully knowing what they are, it seems. It seems like a movie set post-Cloverfield. Most of why people liked Cloverfield wasn't necessarily due to the monster stomping around, but the sense of confusing, alienating dread that followed as these young dipshits tried to scramble around in its aftermath.
People might be expecting a scene or two of big-ass monsters. Let 'em. That's on the filmmakers, not on us. It's not like we're suddenly big fat dummies because we dared to think a movie with the word "Cloverfield" in the title could possibly have some sort of monster in it. Especially when the word "Monster" is also used on the poster for the film that has the word "Cloverfield" in the title.
Even if there's no monster until the very end, I'll still accept it as a sequel.
But a post Cloverfield wouldn't work. Why wouldn't she believe him?
But a post Cloverfield wouldn't work. Why wouldn't she believe him?
It has to be before or the same time frame of Cloverfield. Nothing else would make sense.
But a post Cloverfield wouldn't work. Why wouldn't she believe him?
If the synopsis floating around is accurate, then she was in a car accident and woke up in the bunker. It seems plausible that her car accident happened before the events of the first film, and she wakes up in the bunker after the events of the first film.
Which still wouldn't make sense. If she didn't believe him he could just bring her to the window and let her look.
The only thing that would make sense if it were happening in the same timeline of Cloverfield.
Which still wouldn't make sense.
I can think of a bunch of reasons that a guy holding people in a bunker against their will might want to be dishonest with said people about the outside world.
Haha, this was my introduction to Giacchino.As someone who has had no shame in being a very vocal Cloverfield lover around here, allow me to just say:
HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT! IT'S HAPPENING!
Out of nowhere! Amazing!
I'm listening to ROAR now and I'm hyped for 3/11. Less than two months. So good!!!!!!
Again, you don't actually know enough about what the story of the film actually is to know whether or not a hypothesized setting does or doesn't make sense. You're dismissing possibilities out of hand based on an old synopsis for a rewritten script.
I'm reading some rumors that this is a separate movie with the car/bunker storyline that they decided to edit the very end in order to to tie into Cloverfield and give it a wider audience at the last second. So I'm expecting we see some parasites running around at the end when she escapes, but otherwise, for it to feel nothing like Cloverfield and have very little to do with it.
I was a bigger fan of the idea where we saw the monster attack from another person's camera.
I'm excited, but this does seem very disconnected.
Will Smith's Focus was released in IMAX.I mean it's being released in IMAX. You're gonna tell me there isn't some glorious destruction shown or monsters? Yeah right
I feel like the only reason that the title for this film could have for not being terrible is that Cloverfield becomes a sort of codeword in an anthology series of films about weird sci-fi stuff. If it was a direct sequel then "10 Cloverfield Road" is a really weird title. But if it's a sort of "Here's another film about something weird that's thematically connected" then I think it works.