Fucking unbelievable. Kremlin state press given access, but not the US press. No fucks given.
Article 2: Section 4
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors."
The constitution clearly defines Treason, but not the others: Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors. Those can be argued over sure, but lets look at precedent.
Two Presidents have been impeached:
Andrew Johnson: He defied the Tenure of Office Act
Bill Clinton: Committed Perjury
There is not a substantial enough case yet to bring impeachment against President Trump. I get that there are a lot of questions about Trump's finances. And I hope to god the emoluments civil case headed by Zephyr Teachout succeeds, but It would be unprecedented if the House brought impeachment charges against Trump now for vague "conflict of interest" reasons, and it would FAIL.
Pence just repeating "lost confidence of American people" over and over . Did they take a poll? I know it's typical political BS but it really grinds my gears.
How the hell do you guys always forget the midterms?
People would say there is but that resorts to something a bit more aggressive in terms of getting out to vote and I'm not sure this country is ready to go down this route. Ugh I can't believe it coming to this.That has to be something, ANYTHING we can do about all this. I'm tired of just calling people and telling them to vote No on this or Yes on that. There has to be something more.
I'd say publicly asking for Russia to hack Hillary's email falls under the treason category, but it seems like there is some kind of lower standard for Trump, like he can get away with way more than anyone.Article 2: Section 4
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors."
The constitution clearly defines Treason, but not the others: Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors. Those can be argued over sure, but lets look at precedent.
Two Presidents have been impeached:
Andrew Johnson: He defied the Tenure of Office Act
Bill Clinton: Committed Perjury
There is not a substantial enough case yet to bring impeachment against President Trump. I get that there are a lot of questions about Trump's finances. And I hope to god the emoluments civil case headed by Zephyr Teachout succeeds, but It would be unprecedented if the House brought impeachment charges against Trump now for vague "conflict of interest" reasons, and it would FAIL.
So they can't record what they actually say. Something something handler, something threat, something debt, something lift sanctions,
Can the Dems win back majority in Congress in 2018? That seems to be the only hope.
I'd say publicly asking for Russia to hack Hillary's email falls under the treason category, but it seems like there is some kind of lower standard for Trump, like he can get away with way more than anyone.
Kislyak is the reason Flynn got the boot. This shit is insane for so many reasons.
I really believe the entire GOP is in with this. The way they are acting shows it. This is an entire attempt at a takeover.
Maybe the folks who are convinced this is all over could find other topics to move on to?
I'd say publicly asking for Russia to hack Hillary's email falls under the treason category, but it seems like there is some kind of lower standard for Trump, like he can get away with way more than anyone.
That has to be something, ANYTHING we can do about all this. I'm tired of just calling people and telling them to vote No on this or Yes on that. There has to be something more.
A few months ago, the prospects were dim (mostly due to which seats were coming up for reelection). But now? Pretty decent shot, I think.
A few months ago, the prospects were dim (mostly due to which seats were coming up for reelection). But now? Pretty decent shot, I think.
I don't think so, they just like money and patriotism, religion when it makes them money. When their money is at risk, they'll change.
That has to be something, ANYTHING we can do about all this. I'm tired of just calling people and telling them to vote No on this or Yes on that. There has to be something more.
Greg Sargent of the Washington Post said:President Trumps Tuesday Night Massacre his firing of FBI director James Comey was such a brazen power play in the context of the FBIs ongoing Russia probe that even some Republicans are troubled by it. While many Democrats are now calling for a special prosecutor to handle the Russia affair, a handful of Republican senators are also suggesting the timing of the firing was suspect; that the firing raises questions about whether further political interference will compromise the FBIs investigation; or that an independent investigative mechanism must now take over.
These questions about the future integrity of the Russia probe are all serious and legitimate. But if those Republicans are truly as alarmed as their rhetoric suggests, there are concrete things they can do in the Senate right now that could help compel either a full accounting of the Comey firing, or an independent Russia probe, or both. And Democrats, too, can ratchet up the tactics in a big way to try to force GOP leaders to relent on both of these fronts.
Lets first dispense with two absurd arguments about this mess. The White House says Trump acted quickly on the recommendation of Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, whose explanatory letter faulted Comey for, among other things, holding a news conference to criticize Hillary Clinton while recommending against charges. But the Wall Street Journal reports that the White House was furious with Comey because he refused to tamp down talk of possible collusion between Russian election meddling and the Trump campaign, which the FBI is investigating. Whats more, Trump himself seized on Comeys July criticism of Clinton to argue she was unfit to be president. Now that criticism is a problem? Yeah, right.
Wittes suggested several ideas to me. He noted that, with all Democrats and a handful of Republicans upset about the Comey firing, there are enough senators to create a blocking majority for the next FBI director, who must be confirmed. This blocking majority, Wittes said, could theoretically condition its support for nominees to that post, insisting that the Justice Department produce a fuller accounting of the recommendation into the Comey firing or that the department appoint a special prosecutor on the Russia probe.
Alternatively, Wittes noted, individual senators in either party, but especially in the majority can employ other tactics to force the issue. They could try to oppose funding for various other Justice Department priorities or block other nominations to the department. I would not give that cooperation until the Justice Department names a special prosecutor, Wittes said.
Finally, Democrats with or without a handful of Republican allies, but preferably with them can basically try to grind the Senate to a halt, by refusing cooperation on any legislation or nominations or anything, until GOP leaders and/or the White House agree to some form of independent investigation. Every time theyre asked to cooperate on something, this needs to be front and center, Wittes says. They needs to be focused like a laser beam on that every time theyre asked to give unanimous consent.
How to create a dictatorship 102 classes being taught to himwhat can you say anymore to this whole bizzaro world.
I felt this way a bit during the election mixups. He was fucking dumb about how he handled that. He cost Hillary the election. But the guy isn't an awful FBI director. People are just being dumb now.
This isn't me being partisan, he is actually a terrible FBI director that should have been fired a while ago. He's deeply narcissistic and tends to make the job about himself, this article breaks it down well.
Comey deserved to be fired. The outrage should be reserved for if Trump replaces him with one of his cronies.
Not decent at all, unless you're referring to the House.
The Senate map is dire, to put it lightly:
You see many of those red flipping blue? Because I don't.
It is going to happen (in the House).
But Russian press office is allowed? How does he not think this makes him look guilty as fuck?
But Russian press office is allowed? How does he not think this makes him look guilty as fuck?