They won't, that party is pure evil.
But from their point of the view, the Jed- I mean Democrats are evil.
They won't, that party is pure evil.
Clearly we have a spelling problem for starters.And Americans elected him to be their president.
What does that say shot us as a country?
It's like his only goal in his presidency, is to remove anything that is even remotely beneficial to poor, and or minorities.
"That's XCOM, baby!"
I'll let myself out.
This is SK, where you can collapse a company 50billion dollars in debt (Daewoo) and get amnesty from president, but go to jail for leaking a negative report about Samsung.
SK is a republicans dream
This is SK, where you can collapse a company 50billion dollars in debt (Daewoo) and get amnesty from president, but go to jail for leaking a negative report about Samsung.
SK is a republicans dream
Thats the shit that scares me about America.This is SK, where you can collapse a company 50billion dollars in debt (Daewoo) and get amnesty from president, but go to jail for leaking a negative report about Samsung.
SK is a republicans dream
http://www.epi.org/blog/u-s-korea-t...e-deficits-and-more-than-95000-lost-u-s-jobs/
95000 lost jobs. Yeah it means something.
Putin is really fucking us with this one.
How is now any kind of time to be even considering this.
I had my suspicions as of late. This dude is full on R word? There's no way he doesn't have some sort of mental handicap.
It's probably what it is. Freaking insane.Does he understand that there are TWO koreas?
$27.5 billion trade deficit with them last year.
That has to change.
I blame the spell check.Clearly we have a spelling problem for starters.
Does he understand that there are TWO koreas?
Does he understand that there are TWO koreas?
More like congrats to Putin for rigging it
If you thought people got mad about Avocados, just wait till you try to jack up the price of their cell phones.
Yeah well, unless you want there to be ONLY Apple and whatever Google wants to run its botnets through, I suggest you do the same.
Samsung is just the biggest one I could think of off the top of my head. Most cheap phones also come from South Korea, including the 30 dollar starter phone sorta things. The competition at the bleeding edge forced Apple's phones to get better, enforces Google's inability to gain a foothold without dramatic differences in price or performance per dollar at the least, and is the major reason for the propagation of smart phones in the US.
The spice must flow.
It's like his only goal in his presidency, is to remove anything that is even remotely beneficial to poor, and or minorities.
Does he understand that there are TWO koreas?
Ok, let's pretend Trump somehow is making the right call for the sake of argument. What benefits would ending this trade deal give the United States?
Does he understand that there are TWO koreas?
Be that as it may, a return to NX would require the entire world's agreement and, as free trade, WITH deficits in tow, is still a net positive for countries who run trade deficits in our current economic models
For instance, the attempt by the Hoover administration to return to a balance of trade only worsened the Great Depression, and subsequent attempts to do so have caused the bottom to fall out of domestic and international markets both.
Like it or not, the cat is out of the bag.
Unless you lost your job due to said trade deficit and now can afford none of those.Because then we can move onto Hicks, whose compensation test is one of the larger reasons free trade came about once more and has since stayed -- so using my phone example, we run a trade deficit with South Korea, primarily because phones and other media devices, electronics... and those devices lead to savings elsewhere for Americans
Similarly so for automobiles. We have more than one factory pumping out cars in the US that wasn't there before the trade deal and wouldn't pump out as many cars even if it were, before the trade deal, that brings more jobs over -- losing them in textiles but gaining them in manufacturing.
I'm sorry but you can have no idea what Keynes would or wouldn't do, especially since his late life ideas of avoiding of trade deficits run completely contrary to what you preach.What Keynes claims may well have been good assuming we had an otherwise closed mercantile economy with only one other actor within it, with easily chartable and consistent returns, but our world does not act like that.
This is not to besmirch Keynes, but Keynes has been wrong. I could almost guarantee you that if he were alive today, he would lean further toward free trade, as the global economy of today is dramatically different than 100 years ago.
Those positive effects are more subtle in economies with trade deficits, and the negatives you see are primarily due to automation and poor business dealing than trade itself.
Keynes and Hicks may well have had brighter minds than my own, but there is a reason we discount out of hand the notion that stopping free trade would be good for anyone involved.
Chances he's getting something from China for doing this?
How is now any kind of time to be even considering this.