I can't believe this a thing that really happened.
Nancy and Chuck should be super nice to Trump (to his face) for his entire presidency. They can literally suck his dick on live TV if it gets him to do what they want for all I care.
NPR said:Christians of all denominations, including many evangelicals who have supported President Trump, are speaking out on behalf of immigrants protected from deportation under the DACA program.
Did Ivanka get to "Daddy" again and tell him to be nice to immigrant kids?
Is this all Ivanka's doing?
Is Ivanka up-ending Bannon's White Supremacy agenda with her Daddy's Girl card?
Did Ivanka get to "Daddy" again and tell him to be nice to immigrant kids?
Is this all Ivanka's doing?
Is Ivanka up-ending Bannon's White Supremacy agenda with her Daddy's Girl card?
Did Ivanka get to "Daddy" again and tell him to be nice to immigrant kids?
Is this all Ivanka's doing?
Is Ivanka up-ending Bannon's White Supremacy agenda with her Daddy's Girl card?
No, Ivanka and Jared are USELESS..
I know you are being sarcastic but everyone needs to understand they those two have ZERO influence need to be lumped in with the rest of the terrible people like Conway, Bannon, Gorka, ect...
If those two DO have influence then they are doing an absolutely TERRIBLE job and deserve to be shunned.
Trump getting tired of winning yet?
Trump's thinking is that since Obama had to protect "Dreamers" via executive order, he's going to "one-up" him by doing it via legislation. It's all about accomplishing something Obama couldn't.
This actually is a win for trump, just not the GOP. I expect this will actually improve his favoribility numbers rather dramatically. It demonstrates an actual willingness to work with the other side, something we legitimately haven't really seen from a president since Clinton.
I don't understand. Someone help me understand.
This actually is a win for trump, just not the GOP. I expect this will actually improve his favoribility numbers rather dramatically. It demonstrates an actual willingness to work with the other side, something we legitimately haven't really seen from a president since Clinton.
This actually is a win for trump, just not the GOP. I expect this will actually improve his favoribility numbers rather dramatically. It demonstrates an actual willingness to work with the other side, something we legitimately haven't really seen from a president since Clinton.
Trump's thinking is that since Obama had to protect "Dreamers" via executive order, he's going to "one-up" him by doing it via legislation. It's all about accomplishing something Obama couldn't.
Obama tried nonstop and was met with a republican party whose mission statement was obstruction from day 1.This actually is a win for trump, just not the GOP. I expect this will actually improve his favoribility numbers rather dramatically. It demonstrates an actual willingness to work with the other side, something we legitimately haven't really seen from a president since Clinton.
Obama tried time and again to work with the GOP.
I give it three days before he says something that contradicts this.
This actually is a win for trump, just not the GOP. I expect this will actually improve his favoribility numbers rather dramatically. It demonstrates an actual willingness to work with the other side, something we legitimately haven't really seen from a president since Clinton.
Obama tried nonstop and was met with a republican party whose mission statement was obstruction from day 1.
This actually is a win for trump, just not the GOP. I expect this will actually improve his favoribility numbers rather dramatically. It demonstrates an actual willingness to work with the other side, something we legitimately haven't really seen from a president since Clinton.
Yes.Hopefully the left can shut the fuck up about Schumer and Pelosi now. We need cutthroat politicians out there in the fray, not beacons of purity who will accomplish nothing.
This actually is a win for trump, just not the GOP. I expect this will actually improve his favoribility numbers rather dramatically. It demonstrates an actual willingness to work with the other side.
Obama tried time and again to work with the GOP.
Obama tried nonstop and was met with a republican party whose mission statement was obstruction from day 1.
Trump's thinking is that since Obama had to protect "Dreamers" via executive order, he's going to "one-up" him by doing it via legislation. It's all about accomplishing something Obama couldn't.
What the fuck is even going on.
Who's saying Trump is going to go for Medicare for All? Where did that strawman even come from?These "this is a win for Trump" takes are getting nuttier by the hour.
This is like saying "Obama couldn't get single-payer through, only a flawed ACA -- so Trump is going to go for Medicare for All to one up Obama!"
Guys, leave the 9-dimensional chess nonsense to the_donald.
Who's saying Trump is going to go for Medicare for All? Where did that strawman even come from?
His movements on DACA aren't some long-term strategy and he lacks the basic empathy to care about the people he's using as pawns. Trump only cares about Trump. He wants a "win" and isn't all that particular about where it comes from.
Who's saying Trump is going to go for Medicare for All? Where did that strawman even come from?
His movements on DACA aren't some long-term strategy and he lacks the basic empathy to care about the people he's using as pawns. Trump only cares about Trump. He wants a "win" and isn't all that particular about where it comes from.
It's well known that Obama wanted a bill but had to settle for making an executing order. Obama said as much. Nobody seriously believes Trump wants to protect immigrants more than Obama did. Trump just wants a bill because he'll perceive it as doing something Obama couldn't, because there's no limit to Trump's petty one-upsmanship.It's as ridiculous an idea as the one I quoted, where Trump wanted to protect immigrants more than Obama.
We cannot just redefine 'winning' as anything that makes Trump happy short term, that's just lazy and idiotic.
It's well known that Obama wanted a bill but had to settle for making an executing order. Obama said as much. Nobody seriously believes Trump wants to protect immigrants more than Obama did. Trump just wants a bill because he'll perceive it as doing something Obama couldn't, because there's no limit to Trump's petty one-upsmanship.
I guess now's a good time to remember Trump isn't a republican. He's Trump. If one upping Obama by getting DACA codified into LAW is what he gets done. Good for him, doesn't make him any less of a flaming racist but I can't say I care which president makes DACA into law.
I'm just saying, if he ends up signing DACA into law, good. Personally, I think Trump will give up a lot to have a good headline on TV. What else does he care about more other than himself? If he was at all principled in his racism like sessions that'd be a different story I think.That is nuts. He literally announced his candidacy with insane racist rhetoric. Dude does not want to protect immigrants for the sake of a win solely on that fact.
What system is that? What are you even talking about?That is ridiculous. There are plenty of things Obama did not and
could not do that are not counter to Trump's positions (as weak as they are).
You're setting up a system where everything Trump does is smart and a win, as there are no possible losing scenarios.
How will trump, someone not know for understanding, much less conveying complex ideas, convey the fact that congress directly undoing his executive order was exactly what he wanted the whole time?
in fact, what reason do we have to think he even thinks that way?
how is this saving dreamers when they were put in danger through his own actions in the first place?
WaPo said:One reporter asked Trump to respond to those who say there are mixed signals coming from the White House over DACA, to which the president replied: "No mixed signal at all."
He then continued: "Congress, I really believe, wants to take care of this situation. I really believe it -- even very conservative members of Congress. Ive seen it firsthand. If they dont, were going to see what were going to do. But I will tell you, I really believe Congress wants to take care of it... And I said if we can get something to happen, were going to sign it and were going to make a lot of happy people."
Trump dodged some specific questions about whether or not he wants to provide a pathway to citizenship for DACA recipients ("Thats going to be discussed later," he said) and what he meant when he said he would revisit the issue in six months ("Well, were going to see what happens," he said) and what he wants to see in the legislation he has ordered up ("Id like to see something where we have good border security, and we have a great DACA transaction, where everybody is happy," he said). Trump added that he would like to see "a permanent deal" when it comes to dreamers, and he's confidant that will happen.
"I think were going to have great support from both sides of Congress," he said, "and I really believe that Congress is going to work very hard on the DACA agreement and come up with something.