No, just stop.
You have to be extremely paranoid to think Trump is going to order a genocide. You don't have to be a Trump fan to understand how banal that sounds.
I'm not American but I feel like such a claim is too extreme.
Where did he say he was destroying Healthcare? Is he blowing up Hospitals? Last I heard, he wanted to replace health insurance.
Your only argument against him saying Fascism starts slowly, then very quickly was that there are lots of guns in the US. What if the people holding the guns agree with the fascist? That's not even considering how pointless those guns would be against the US military but anyway, what I'm talking about doesn't exist in a vacuum. This unfortunately is the reality where Trump has also become an arbiter for you know, Neo-Nazis and Fascists? And they seem to really like him for some completely unknown reason.
The reality where Trump knows a prominent portion of his base comprises of foam mouthed racists, and he placates them. Just like when he refused to outwardly condemn David Duke, or when he chose to equivocate the Charlottesville rally protesters with Neo-Nazis,
what about the alt-left? The same rally which had people dress up like Trump lol. Retweeting videos from a fascist hate group from my own merry Brexitopia? Cutting funding to organisations tackling Far Right domestic radicalisation? His appointment of Steve Bannon and Jeff Sessions show how deep he's willing to scrape the barrel but that Sebastian Gorka chap even has ties to far right fascist groups. Showing support for the likes of Duerte, Le Pen, how do you contextualise these things alongside his actions and those of his cabinet? There's a clear organised attempt by his lot to obfuscate the truth and Trump supporters clapping and hollering at his rallies as regaled them with stories of protesters getting beaten up, pure otherism btw, and yup that makes me think "gee, this looks like fascism brewing". This is also the reality where Fox News exists, don't think I have to even go into detail with that one, that's before considering the rejuvenation of the Far Right in the West. Why do you get to just wave it off because "guns" alone doesn't seem like a valuable retort.
Neofascism, political philosophy and movement that arose in Europe in the decades following World War II. Like earlier fascist movements, neofascism advocated extreme nationalism, opposed liberal individualism, attacked Marxist and other left-wing ideologies, indulged in racist and xenophobic scapegoating, and promoted populist right-wing economic programs. Unlike the fascists, however, neofascists placed more blame for their countries problems on non-European immigrants than on leftists and Jews, displayed little interest in taking lebensraum (German: living space) through the military conquest of other states, and made concerted efforts to portray themselves as democratic and mainstream. The National Front in France, led by Jean-Marie Le Pen, and the Liberal-Democratic Party in Russia, led by Vladimir Zhirinovsky, are often cited as neofascist.
Is that close enough? Will Neo-Fascist do? America's most fascist president? Populist? Demagogue? If none of that is applicable, what should I call him?
I agree with Dex to be honest, the bigger problem seems to be the people willing for fascist rule. Comes with the anti-intellectualism, scapegoating and lugenpresse shit. Trump is just dumb enough to enable them all. That's why his blatant hypocrisy with the Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays war is perfect - he only says that shit to stroke off the racists he enables.
To Dunki, I really don't want to get into any form of conversation where the existence of fascism elsewhere is evidence enough against it's resurgence anywhere else. I feel as if the parallels between Trump's rise and other fascists are strong enough to at least consider the notion is worth conversation.