• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Twin Peaks Season 3 |OT2| It's Just A Change, Not An End

Blader

Member
I wouldn't be so fast to dismiss the link between the New York box and television either, despite Lynch's comments.

Personally, I am just fine dismissing speculation about author intent when the author explicitly says when something was not his intent :lol
 

gun_haver

Member
I've never thought of David Lynch as someone who operates on a cultural commentary level, so I never even consider things like Freddie being a satire of superheroes. I mean who knows, I'm not saying I think Lynch stuff is completely random, but I do think it's very self-obsessed and self-referential, rather than outward looking. I mean he claims he doesn't even really watch new movies or anything, just not a guy I can see wanting to rip on the marvel extended universe. With the box; nothing so direct as 'this is a commentary on watching TV' - because of the reason I just said and also b...what commentary? what's the substance of it?
 

Krev

Unconfirmed Member
Personally, I am just fine dismissing speculation about author intent when the author explicitly says when something was not his intent :lol
How much of Twin Peaks is 'intended' though? A major element of Lynch's creative process is about surrendering to his subconscious and his intuition.
I've never thought of David Lynch as someone who operates on a cultural commentary level, so I never even consider things like Freddie being a satire of superheroes. I mean who knows, I'm not saying I think Lynch stuff is completely random, but I do think it's very self-obsessed and self-referential, rather than outward looking. I mean he claims he doesn't even really watch new movies or anything, just not a guy I can see wanting to rip on the marvel extended universe. With the box; nothing so direct as 'this is a commentary on watching TV' - because of the reason I just said and also b...what commentary? what's the substance of it?
I don't think Lynch is commenting on Marvel or whatever. More that he's using the symbolism of 'TV', a thing that presents us with convenient dreams, in the same way that Hollywood serves this purpose in Mulholland Drive.
If there is any subconscious TV symbolism to the viewing box (and I feel there is) I don't really feel that's operating on the level of commentary.
 

Krev

Unconfirmed Member
The actress is really beautiful, and I liked the character. It's a shame he wasn't in it more, but then that might have undermined the Jones's storyline which I won't have.
I agree, she was great. Wish there was more of her.
Personally, I am just fine dismissing speculation about author intent when the author explicitly says when something was not his intent :lol
To go further with this, here's how Lynch was questioned about that:
Were you trying to give the audience an allegory for TV-watching or how to watch the show?
No. But that's an interesting way to think about it.
I don't think that this rules out the scene being intended to echo Sarah Palmer watching the animal rip apart its prey on the TV, which is what I was arguing. There are echoes and parallels all throughout the season: the Woodsman and Jacobi, Bushnell the boxer and the magic glove, the lucky penny and the Abe Lincoln Woodsman, etc
But again, who knows what's intended and what's not. I wouldn't say authorial intent is irrelevant, but Lynch himself tell us that we find our own meaning in a work like Twin Peaks.
 
[–]pablozablo 8 points 2 hours ago

Further thoughts - The "Gotta light?" guy on the radio putting everyone to sleep - what has TV got that radio hasn't? Lights of course. This represents the TV overtaking radio in the 50s as the primary broadcast medium, and putting everyone to sleep, metaphorically speaking. Lynch is telling us that TV has put us all in a coma. By rescuing Laura, Dale is destroying the TV world, but this is the only way he can destroy Judy (TV) and rescue us from its grip.


Hahaha

I love that this show exists
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
I only saw the very first season years ago around the time it first came out. Is it worth getting all caught up? I forgot almost everything about it, I tried to rewatch the original Twin Peaks again and it just didn't stand the test of time to me, I had a hard time watching it.

But I had some interest in going back if it's worth getting caught up again for this new season.
 

mjp2417

Banned
I only saw the very first season years ago around the time it first came out. Is it worth getting all caught up? I forgot almost everything about it, I tried to rewatch the original Twin Peaks again and it just didn't stand the test of time to me, I had a hard time watching it.

But I had some interest in going back if it's worth getting caught up again for this new season.

The first two seasons and Fire Walk with Me are absolutely essential. You'll be completely lost without them. You can probably skip the middle part of Season 2 though. Consult this if you are tempted to skip episodes:
CLRxpsvUYAATupW.jpg
 

BorkBork

The Legend of BorkBork: BorkBorkity Borking
Hahaha

I love that this show exists

Yeah the theories and discussions have been something else.

Latest one that connected with me while sifting through the Reddit channel is people talking about the similarities between this season and Philip K Dick's Ubik, possibly one of my favourite sci-fi book:

"Some connections:
1. older surroundings and tech (although it hasn't continued going backwards), 2. communications with the "outside" (or "inside") world through odd portals, 3. talismans (Ubik in the book, a variety of things in Twin Peaks), 4. uncertainty about who is in half-life/"the dreamer", 5. objects re-appearing where they shouldn't, 6. a mounting sense of dread, 7. a pointed satire of consumerism, 8. juxtaposition of extreme kitsch and philosophical ideas, 9. uncertainty about who to trust."
 

Prurient

Banned
The first two seasons and Fire Walk with Me are absolutely essential. You'll be completely lost without them. You can probably skip the middle part of Season 2 though. Consult this if you are tempted to skip episodes:
CLRxpsvUYAATupW.jpg

One day I want to make an edit of the show that removes nothing but Billy Zane's character. In a series that has some iffy acting he stands out, dude is an absolute charisma black hole.
 
One day I want to make an edit of the show that removes nothing but Billy Zane's character. In a series that has some iffy acting he stands out, dude is an absolute charisma black hole.

Billy Zane can take James and his motorcycle with him as well. I can keep the rest.

Well, they can keep the weasel as well. I binged the entire series again right before the finale and the bad parts of season two were more tolerable. Probably due to knowing what goodness laid ahead.
 

Wollan

Member
Is it confirmed in any way that Shadow by Chromatics was written for Twin Peaks season 3?
Were they given insight into the story of the season or final episodes? Or input on lyrics?
Amazing overlap otherwise.
 
I only saw the very first season years ago around the time it first came out. Is it worth getting all caught up? I forgot almost everything about it, I tried to rewatch the original Twin Peaks again and it just didn't stand the test of time to me, I had a hard time watching it.

But I had some interest in going back if it's worth getting caught up again for this new season.

Just watch it all. Hacking away at these shows is stupid unless they are like 12 seasons long or are not heavily serialized with their storytelling
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
Is it confirmed in any way that Shadow by Chromatics was written for Twin Peaks season 3?
Were they given insight into the story of the season or final episodes? Or input on lyrics?
Amazing overlap otherwise.

Unlikely. If you check out Soundcloud and do a search for "KEXP Twin Peaks" there's a bunch of radio chats/interviews with (Lynch's audio guy) Dean Hurley that go into some detail as to the origin's of the various music selections.
 

Blader

Member
I agree, she was great. Wish there was more of her.

To go further with this, here's how Lynch was questioned about that:

I don't think that this rules out the scene being intended to echo Sarah Palmer watching the animal rip apart its prey on the TV, which is what I was arguing. There are echoes and parallels all throughout the season: the Woodsman and Jacobi, Bushnell the boxer and the magic glove, the lucky penny and the Abe Lincoln Woodsman, etc

I gotcha. Although these other parallels are really interesting!

https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6znkvl/s3e18_tracking_judy/

Give this a look. Interesting stuff here, though people will have different ideas to a number of things mentioned here.

Now this is a theory I can get behind (for the most part at least). A lot of this stuff makes sense and lines up pretty well with each other without having to speculate too much about the Fireman/Judy cosmic chess game.

Is it confirmed in any way that Shadow by Chromatics was written for Twin Peaks season 3?
Were they given insight into the story of the season or final episodes? Or input on lyrics?
Amazing overlap otherwise.

It wasn't. Johnny Jewel said recently that they wrote the song a few years ago, Lynch's music supervisor was a fan and put it on Lynch's radar, who liked it and decided to use it. I don't think they were given any insight into the story about how to write music for it either. Jewel said he'd just write music based on what his memories of Twin Peaks were (as opposed to going back and rewatching the show, for fear of then too closely emulating the show's score), and send hours of stuff to Lynch to listen to, who would then pick out things like Windswept that he liked.
 

Corpsepyre

Banned
Sounds optimistic to me. I can imagine the whole process is draining for him, so he wants another break for a bit. It's understandable.

He should get all the time he wants for the new season though. He's not getting any younger, as is the cast, so I just hope he makes a short mini-season and caps this all off.
 

Katori

Member
Just finished episode 8 what in the fuck did my brain just witness I'm assuming it was backstory for the woodsmen who are creepy as fuck

It was backstory for the Woodsmen, BOB, and who you know currently as "The Experiment." With a healthy dose of reading between the lines, it will all fall into place...
 

Dusk Golem

A 21st Century Rockefeller
I just keep worrying that something may happen and Lynch might not live much longer, like he smokes a lot and such so cancer or something.

But I'll remain hopeful.
 

Airola

Member
I'm still quite bothered that this

BbV16Ix.gif


ended up with this

Mnh5aa9.jpg



They could've used Bob to be morphed on people's faces with no problem.
But what we got was exactly one scene like that (and it was awesome!) and the rest was this orb thing.

The mirror scene was so damn promising it's a shame they never went anywhere with it.
 

Krev

Unconfirmed Member
The only thing a fourth season could be is Dale Cooper learning to leave Laura Palmer behind and escape the loop. It would be nothing like any previous Twin Peaks thing and much more like a really out there Lynch film.
 

Big One

Banned
Hrm the thing with season 4 is that as much as me and everyone else wants it, what else can Lynch really tell us about the Twin Peaks world? Unless he goes balls-to-the-wall with the time travel/parallel reality stuff, Judy as the endgame pretty much sends the series in one direction and one direction alone. To be honest, it might just be better for him to release another film ala Fire Walk With Me and resolve some of the bigger mysteries of Season 3 (like what is happening with Audrey) while establishing a few more mysteries as well.
 

gun_haver

Member
I'd be more up for a 2-3 hour movie than another 18 hour series, honestly. There was a lot of chaff and bullshit mixed in with good stuff this season, and not just 'this is boring' but like 'this is actually pissing me off' kind of bad - the sheer brutality against women at times, that scene where gordon is admiring the french woman leaving, audrey's stuff except for the last minute of it - and I'm sure some of that would be the first on the chopping block

Also, if he's going to make more film stuff, why not something entirely new? This season basically killed off all but the die hard David Lynch/arthouse fans anyway. I'd be surprised if there were more than a few Peaks-only casual fans left standing by the end of it. A lot of this had very little to do with Twin Peaks at all, so why not be free and not have to tie in meandering ideas to an existing world/mythology?

Then again, I really don't mind. Like I said in a previous post, I've kind of had everything I need out of David Lynch with this last gargantuan piece of work.
 
I think a movie would be a good fit for where the story left off, I'm not sure how a whole season would tackle that. I'd devour a season 4 though, I just hope people aren't asking for it with the expectations that it'll offer more resolution. Whether he does 3, 4 or 25 seasons he's always going to end it on a similar note.
 

Corpsepyre

Banned
I dont think he's going to make a film, given what he now thinks of Hollywood and the cinema itself. He's really into cable TV. Unless he makes something for Netflix, then yeah that can be discussed. But a standalone theatrical release, hmm nah.
 
I do not see Lynch/Frost making another 18 hours of Twin Peaks.

But even if they aim to make a feature length piece, he'll still shoot 5+ hours of material.
 

Krev

Unconfirmed Member
I think a movie would be a good fit for where the story left off, I'm not sure how a whole season would tackle that. I'd devour a season 4 though, I just hope people aren't asking for it with the expectations that it'll offer more resolution. Whether he does 3, 4 or 25 seasons he's always going to end it on a similar note.
I think it's reasonable to hope for an Inland Empire ambiguous ending as opposed to the Mulholland Drive meets Lost Highway tone of the ending we got. Personally I think the ending was perfect.
 

Boem

Member
I'm very, very happy with what we got, and if this is the end, I'm more than satisfied. I have absolutely no idea what the next season could or would be. The only reason I would be excited is because I'm going to see these great people make another thing, not necessarily to get 'closure'. There are always going to be a lot of things left open to interpretation, no matter how many more hours of Peaks we get. Which is as it should be.

And even though I'm very happy with this ending as the final ending, if they announce another season in 2/3 years, I'm confident they're not going to screw it up. As long as it's Lynch and Frost again, it's going to be fine. They're not suddenly going to Jurassic World the shit out of this, and I assume that they're only going to do more it's going to be something they think is worth making. That's good enough for me.
 

Jakten

Member
Didn't see this posted on the last few pages....

I know at a certain point the rabbit hole of overlaying footage is some insane person stuff but this is pretty fascinating

Endings of 17+18 overlapped leading into a reversed/rearranged Part 2 sequence

Can't say I care for calling it "The Real Ending" when it's someone's theory/edit but the way this plays out is rad as hell and makes sense?

make. sense of it

Considering that Lynch loves Wizard of Oz I guess I can't be too surprised that he likely included something akin to the Oz + Dark Side of the Moon overlaying into Twin Peaks. I dunno if this has been posted but both of each full episodes have parts that pair up https://medium.com/@onantiad/episod...n-are-meant-to-be-watched-in-sync-81352ce38e8
 

Boem

Member
Considering that Lynch loves Wizard of Oz I guess I can't be too surprised that he likely included something akin to the Oz + Dark Side of the Moon overlaying into Twin Peaks. I dunno if this has been posted but both of each full episodes have parts that pair up https://medium.com/@onantiad/episod...n-are-meant-to-be-watched-in-sync-81352ce38e8

Sabrina Sutherland already said that that was not how it was intended.

Q: There is a link going around that composites episodes 17 and 18 together so that the scenes and dialogue overlap...was this the intended way to watch these episodes all along or is it a happy accident they work together surprisingly well?

A: This is definitely not the way to watch these parts.
https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6zb65w/im_sabrina_sutherland_executive_producer_of_twin/

Of course, this isn't Lynch answering (he'll never say anything about it), but after Lynch she's the closest person who could give a definite answer on this.
 

Zutrax

Member
The first two seasons and Fire Walk with Me are absolutely essential. You'll be completely lost without them. You can probably skip the middle part of Season 2 though. Consult this if you are tempted to skip episodes:
CLRxpsvUYAATupW.jpg

Ah shit so I'm still in the "good parts". I've never seen Twin Peaks and I'm wanting to finally watch all of it now that it's completed. I'm on Season 2 Episode 4 and thought it was great so far considering how much flak I heard season 2 got. But turns out I just haven't gotten into the crap yet, I really hope season 3 is worth it.
 

Boem

Member
Ah shit so I'm still in the "good parts". I've never seen Twin Peaks and I'm wanting to finally watch all of it now that it's completed. I'm on Season 2 Episode 4 and thought it was great so far considering how much flak I heard season 2 got. But turns out I just haven't gotten into the crap yet, I really hope season 3 is worth it.

It is. All I'll say is, be ready for a very different experience. Some people hate it, some people love it. But if it clicks with you, it can be something very special.

It's honestly one of my favorite tv experiences of all time. Which I know sounds hyperbolic as hell and the same thing people say whenever their favorite superhero gets a new movie, but hand on my heart, I mean it.
 
Top Bottom