Help me out here -
Why do we see the scene where Coop loses Laura twice?
If Coop travels to 1989 and loses Laura, how does he make it back to the present?
Or, if he doesn't and stays in '89, how does Diane meet him at the curtain?
My brain hurts so much.
I'm late and not fully caught up on the thread, but has anybody talked about this yet ? At first I thought nothing much of this guy. "Must have been a violent husband or something like that".
But why are his arms like this ? Looks like he was writing on a computer before his body went cold.
Also, did anyone else notice that for the finale, there's no electricity sound anymore when the Lynch/Frost Productions logo appears at the very end ?
Also, did anyone else notice that for the finale, there's no electricity sound anymore when the Lynch/Frost Productions logo appears at the very end ?
Sorry, posting again so it's not lost at the bottom of the previous page.
I'm late and not fully caught up on the thread, but has anybody talked about this yet ? At first I thought nothing much of this guy. "Must have been a violent husband or something like that".
But why are his arms like this ? Looks like he was writing on a computer before his body went cold.
Also, did anyone else notice that for the finale, there's no electricity sound anymore when the Lynch/Frost Productions logo appears at the very end ?
Isn't the shot of Leland Palmer saying "find Laura" mirrored compared to the first time it happened?
I wonder if that means anything.
Not only that, but what's up with the shirt? The way it's sticking up seems kind of like there's something underneath it. Plus there's something like puke on the front of his shirt. I don't think it's blood since he was shot through the head. Kind of looks like the garmonbozia puke Mr. C puked up in episode 3.
Even if this was bigger than Game of Thrones I doubt we'd see another season. Things are over for Cooper and Laura, the characters at the core of Twin Peaks. Do we want a show about the side characters, or one of multiple variations of the scenario of episode 18? It would be totally superfluous.So has there been any word, post finale, from Showtime on how successful the show was for them? I know the on-air ratings weren't great but I'm assuming (or hoping?) streaming numbers really carried the show.
Just desperately want a press release that talks about how pleased they are with the show in the hopes we're somehow fortunate enough to get another season from the powers that be.
Her dream is coming to a close. She wants to be lead out of her reality, and subconsciously she knows that's what Cooper is there to do.It's so odd.
Why does Carrie have no problem letting the FBI into her house when she has a murdered geezer in there? She barely acknowledges it.
Who killed him?
The scene where BOB was defeated stood out to me as a very "TV ending" even as I was watching it. The big bad is dramatically defeated, and all the protagonists are somehow gathered together for a warm "farewell" and one last laugh. "I'm glad we made enough sandwiches!"One theory that seems pretty solid is that the whole thing has been a TV show, with actors playing a variety of roles and characters.
What if Laura is Judy? There is no good and evil, just two rival forces?Judy almost seems to be a God of Evil in the Twin Peaks universe. She can just will Laura away from Coop at the end of 17. It is unbeatable.
Same here. I was surprised that the Cooper overlay didn't turn out to be a reflection on some kind of magical screen (and we do know how much the Fireman likes his clip shows, he even had an entirely curved TV installed in the ceiling).The scene where BOB was defeated stood out to me as a very "TV ending" even as I was watching it. The big bad is dramatically defeated, and all the protagonists are somehow gathered together for a warm "farewell" and one last laugh. "I'm glad we made enough sandwiches!"
I'm incredibly relieved to find out Addi was joking. It was hard to tell - his post sounded just like the bile I've seen spewed all to often by genuine haters of Lynch and his appreciators.
The scene where BOB was defeated stood out to me as a very "TV ending" even as I was watching it. The big bad is dramatically defeated, and all the protagonists are somehow gathered together for a warm "farewell" and one last laugh. "I'm glad we made enough sandwiches!"
So are we all in agreement that Cooper and Diane enter a dream?
So are we all in agreement that Cooper and Diane enter a dream? Someone's dream. That's why things feel so unusual. It feels like a dream. The hotel magically changes overnight. The car changes. The random dead guy that barely gets acknowledged. The general mood. It's a dream. It's meant to be something approximating our reality, but it's not. There is something off about it.
Who is the dreamer?
Who was the drooling guy in the jail cell?
What if it's Judy?
So are we all in agreement that Cooper and Diane enter a dream? Someone's dream. That's why things feel so unusual. It feels like a dream. The hotel magically changes overnight. The car changes. The random dead guy that barely gets acknowledged. The general mood. It's a dream. It's meant to be something approximating our reality, but it's not. There is something off about it.
Who is the dreamer?
Who was the drooling guy in the jail cell?
I'm late and not fully caught up on the thread, but has anybody talked about this yet ? At first I thought nothing much of this guy. "Must have been a violent husband or something like that".
Even if this was bigger than Game of Thrones I doubt we'd see another season. Things are over for Cooper and Laura, the characters at the core of Twin Peaks. Do we want a show about the side characters, or one of multiple variations of the scenario of episode 18? It would be totally superfluous.
This is the end.
She says 911 backwards, like a Lodge resident. I think, much like Audrey's store provides clues to Laura's dream, she's there to hint at Sparkle. Sparkle users talk about seeing animals multiple time in the show, and we know that the Lodge is no stranger to using animals as a messenger for something (the white horse appears in the lodge itself, so it's not something inherent to Sarah.) That combined with Red being a spooky magic man implies that Sparkle relates to the Lodge in some wayWhat happened to the 1-1-9 woman?
Yeah, this scene had me really scratching my head for a while. What stood out from the still frame was the bulge in his stomach that looked like another "Bob" sphere emerging from him, and what looks like Garmonbozia on his shirt. It's clear that even in this alternate reality that was created when Cooper interrupted the past, Laura/Carrie is being tormented by a Lodge entity, though she clearly seems more capable of defending herself in this new place and time.
You think Cooper is just done at that point? No purpose anymore? I don't believe things are over.
My feelings are that if they wanted to continue, they could continue with Coop and Laura/Carrie. They're no longer beholden to Twin Peaks nostalgia since they can literally portray things as differently as that want, given the current condition of those characters. They're in a bad way, but there's no reason to think that their story *has* to end there. I'm hopeful we get more, but will also be okay if we don't.
I think that if they made more Twin Peaks, be it a movie or season, it would still end up being somewhat inconclusive and similar to what we just got.
I feel like the finale felt like it was a cliffhanger for a new series and didn't feel conclusive at all, but on further reflection ended up being pretty conclusive. In that, it will always be inconclusive as Cooper tries again and again to make things right but just can't. The black orb of Judy will just keep moving around infinitely and Cooper will just keep chasing it trying to make it stop.
We have seen the results of the first person who was exposed to this nightmare.
The thread I think most obviously dangling should they want to continue is Gordon Cole.
When the original run ended, we had 'See you again in 25 years' to give us a reasonable reason to believe in more.
Now, I keep thinking about that line where Coop is told to find Gordon, because he'll remember the unofficial events. So Gordon will presumably have knowledge that could help our heroes wherever they may be.
I could not agree more.I actually think Lynch elevated the TV format to a whole new level. There has often been discussions if TV has overtaken film in terms of quality and even though it has clear strengths, I have never really been convinced. Because of the length of TV series, stories rely on a sort of logical causality and the levels of abstraction are pretty low. It's like comparing poems to novels. Twin Peaks Season 3 is a combinations of the two worlds and I think that's part of the reason why it's called an 18 hours movie. It's not because of anything structural, but because it's a clear poetic vision of an auteur.
There is another story to tell, but I don't think it's worth telling. It wouldn't lead us anywhere that wasn't already communicated by that final episode. It would be an exercise in wallowing in misery, with nothing redemptive about it. The infinity of the suffering Cooper and Laura are doomed to was the point of the final episode, and it was a beautiful and horrifying cautionary tale, so it was worth putting out into the world for what it gives to its audience.You think Cooper is just done at that point? No purpose anymore? I don't believe things are over.
My feelings are that if they wanted to continue, they could continue with Coop and Laura/Carrie. They're no longer beholden to Twin Peaks nostalgia since they can literally portray things as differently as that want, given the current condition of those characters. They're in a bad way, but there's no reason to think that their story *has* to end there. I'm hopeful we get more, but will also be okay if we don't.
I like to think she was Mrs Chalfont/Treymond.What happened to the 1-1-9 woman?
An addictive and physically destructive drug an effective method to further their lodge dwellers' goal of generating pain and sorrow.She says 911 backwards, like a Lodge resident. I think, much like Audrey's store provides clues to Laura's dream, she's there to hint at Sparkle. Sparkle users talk about seeing animals multiple time in the show, and we know that the Lodge is no stranger to using animals as a messenger for something (the white horse appears in the lodge itself, so it's not something inherent to Sarah.) That combined with Red being a spooky magic man implies that Sparkle relates to the Lodge in some way
And the Lynch/Frost logo's buzz has been replaced by silence. The end of the dream that is Twin Peaks.I kind of think it is appropriate to consider Mulholland Dr. when it comes Twin Peaks too. Especially when it comes to the 4th wall stuff. And there is that woodsman type person in there too. As well as eternal recurrence and mobius strip like concepts.
But the final Silencio of Mulholland Dr. is often interpreted as the end of the dream for the audience/subject to the film. With their experience of the film being akin to a dream.
Totally agree that even if they ever make more it is very unlikely to have a definitive ending. I just think if they wanted to, they absolutely can (and would) continue on with these characters. Nothing about the ending suggested a finality to what Cooper was doing, simply that he's in a foreign time and place (and as such, in a bad way).
Since they're never gonna give us an explanation I'ma just say that was BillyWho was the drooling guy in the jail cell?
There is another story to tell, but I don't think it's worth telling. It wouldn't lead us anywhere that wasn't already communicated by that final episode. It would be an exercise in wallowing in misery, with nothing redemptive about it. The infinity of the suffering Cooper and Laura are doomed to was the point of the final episode, and it was a beautiful and horrifying cautionary tale, so it was worth putting out into the world for what it gives to its audience.
Oh yeah, there is definitely room for more.
If my assumption about the series (at least in part) is right though (that is, "waking up", liberation etc. Judy dreaming the nightmare they all live in, one reality or another), Lynch might be concerned about people mistaking the finger pointing at the moon for the moon itself, if you know what I mean. They absolutely could make more and I would love to see more, I just doubt things would turn out that much differently.
yeah this is good stuff, I'm taking this answer.An addictive and physically destructive drug an effective method to further their lodge dwellers' goal of generating pain and sorrow.
Since they're never gonna give us an explanation I'ma just say that was Billy
For sure, I'd be open to it because I trust in their creative partnership, but it's hard to imagine a continuation that wouldn't artistically compromise this one.I think ultimately, you're probably right, but the best thing I can say about this past season is that it frequently and genuinely surprised me. If Lynch/Frost wanted to tell another story, I'd have faith that they came up with something compelling.
I think it's slightly more realistic to hope for another Lynch/Frost collaboration or at least a new Lynch film. It would be at least as valuable as an unrecognizable furthering of Twin Peaks.Most of my wanting more comes out of literal wanting, and not the belief there should be more. I really enjoyed season three and would like to see them continue even if the show becomes even less recognizable from what it was originally.
There wasn't room for him in the narrative. He is dead, and isn't someone Cooper wanted to resurrect.Looks like the Upcoming Tim & Eric episode is going to have more Ray Wise than 18 hours of Twin Peaks Season 3
I feel like you never know with actors and schedules though. Maybe Ray Wise just didn't really want to be involved or had conflicts.
But when you talk about destruction
Don't you know that you can count me out, in
There wasn't room for him in the narrative. He is dead, and isn't someone Cooper wanted to resurrect.