He drops them on our families.What does Corbyn do with all the bombs he steals from your army?
Um no thanks I actually love this country with friends, family and history here, unfortunately I don't have the privilege of being some upper class champagne swigging Hampstead liberal twat that can afford to move to a villa on the Spanish Coast.
I'm here to stay, and frankly being Black and British hasn't convinced me of the generalisation that all brexitiers are EDL marching social dregs. I know plenty of older generation Black, Asian and Irish who grew up in the 70's when bigotry was as blatant and raw as sign on a pub window that still voted leave, the referendum was so much more complicated than what you keyboard activists thought of it.
I voted remain and I still believe we should Remain, however I also believe a democratic election took place with the highest voter turn out in our nations history, and obviously the Remain camp failed or rather didn't bother to convince anyone outside the M25 or any other student enclave the implications that Voting Leave may have. That said it's done now, am I annoyed? yes absolutely, and do I want to work towards a better future in this country? absolutely, but what I'm not going to do is sit in some corner of the internet like a salty, bitter, whiny bitch and play to the stereotype of a 'remoaner' by wishing the hardship on millions good natured hardworking people in this country just so I can go "ha, ha told you so" fuck that, i'm better than that.
Gosh, if there only were some... unions made that facilitated free movement of people or something.I do find it interesting that you label anyone who can relocate as 'Champagne swigging Hampstead elite'
Remarkably, there is some more evidence of a slight Labour recovery in the past few days:
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 47% (-2)
LAB: 30% (+3)
LDEM: 10% (-)
UKIP: 5% (-)
GRN: 2% (-1)
(via @PanelbaseMD / 28 Apr - 02 May)
I am finding this pretty unintuitive tbh. I was expecting Labour's share of the vote to move towards Corbyn's approval rate in the mid 10s. Obviously that may still pan out but it does seem like Labour's share of the vote is holding OK right now.
He drops them on our families.
I think I read it on a bus.
Tories launched a new poster today:
Not sure they entirely thought it through:
It would be most delicious if this backfired on the Tories.
Let me tell you that I'm so frustrated and angry at the UK public right now. Why aren't more people fighting this? I'm disappointed with this kind of attitude. Right now I'm just working hard to better myself, hope nothing else goes wrong in my life and eventually I will try to move to a more liberal place.
At least we can all celebrate UKIP fucking off.
Are you seriously suggesting that the UK isn't liberal, what world do you live on to think that?
Hell look at the many countries round the world that have it worse then us, some of them are also European countries.
UK (Scotland): Male voters aged 16-34 yrs support #indy by 71%, female voters aged 55+ yrs oppose it by 77% (Panelpase poll). #ScotRef
I'm a bit sad that the Greens are down to 2% though
I think the real surprise of election night - and Huw_Dawson might will burst into my office and beat me with a slipper for saying this - will be how low the amount of seats the Lib Dems pick up is.
The Greens don't have to worry about their nationwide percentage so much - their focus is on the two constituencies that they have a genuine chance of winning.
I guess so
Just saw this article on the Standard website btw, inheritance tax on estates worth £425,000? Sounds a bit barmy to me.
It might not be a vote winner but I don't see anything barmy about it, London as usual makes dealing with property values really complicated.
If any international GAF want to ask what an old leave voter is like, this is probably a good example
https://twitter.com/AngrySalmond/status/859716281079132160
Also a Freudian Scottish Independence slip "I'm proud they'll be coming out of Britain...."
I'LL BE VOTING FOR THERESA MAY!
It does go to show you though Labour voters swinging to Conservative because Brexit is of the utmost importance. The Euro hate is strong.
Well that's basically it. I thought the point of inheritance tax was to take from "the rich". I have a mate who owns a two bedroom flat in Cricklewood and it's worth about £450,000. The idea that he should be paying a tax aimed at rich people seems ridiculous.
Well that's basically it. I thought the point of inheritance tax was to take from "the rich". I have a mate who owns a two bedroom flat in Cricklewood and it's worth about £450,000. The idea that he should be paying a tax aimed at rich people seems ridiculous.
If any international GAF want to ask what an old leave voter is like, this is probably a good example
https://twitter.com/AngrySalmond/status/859716281079132160
Also a Freudian Scottish Independence slip "I'm proud they'll be coming out of Britain...."
I'LL BE VOTING FOR THERESA MAY!
It does go to show you though Labour voters swinging to Conservative because Brexit is of the utmost importance. The Euro hate is strong. Not sure I'd call him a fucking idiot, bit harsh, but man, the comments on that Tweet are true
Is £450,000 poor people money?
The average house price in the UK is £217,502. Compared to the rest of the nation he's pretty asset rich.
Well that's basically it. I thought the point of inheritance tax was to take from "the rich". I have a mate who owns a two bedroom flat in Cricklewood and it's worth about £450,000. The idea that he should be paying a tax aimed at rich people seems ridiculous.
Some people are calling leave voters racist, some of them are. I don't why either side struggles with this concept of some, most and all.
He is a bit of an idiot though. He clearly thought he was talking to a labour MP, despite all the signs around him.
Is £450,000 poor people money?
The average house price in the UK is £217,502. Compared to the rest of the nation he's pretty asset rich. In Wales it's about £140,000. In Scotland, it's about £160,000. In NI, it's about £130,000
It's like Mylene Klass bleating about her 2 million quid semi, maybe fucking up the city of London will make all this easier to deal with in future.
I get what Quiche is saying, I live in a very expensive house that isn't worth the money, i don't know if some kind of london exemption is feasible.
Well that's basically it. I thought the point of inheritance tax was to take from "the rich". I have a mate who owns a two bedroom flat in Cricklewood and it's worth about £450,000. The idea that he should be paying a tax aimed at rich people seems ridiculous.
Remarkably, there is some more evidence of a slight Labour recovery in the past few days:
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 47% (-2)
LAB: 30% (+3)
LDEM: 10% (-)
UKIP: 5% (-)
GRN: 2% (-1)
(via @PanelbaseMD / 28 Apr - 02 May)
I am finding this pretty unintuitive tbh. I was expecting Labour's share of the vote to move towards Corbyn's approval rate in the mid 10s. Obviously that may still pan out but it does seem like Labour's share of the vote is holding OK right now.
Bearing in mind the median property in the UK is worth £204,000 and the mean property in the UK is worth £295,335, he's doing pretty well compared to most (both 2015, so they'll have shifted up a bit since then). Housing prices are distributed approximately speaking with a log-normal distribution, and I could probably do the maths at some other point, but just eyeballing the data, he has one of the top 20% most valuable properties in the UK, at the very least.
More people in London rent than own, so while his flat may be below average in value, owning a property in London in the first place is no longer the average. Depending on his age, he may be even further from the average.No, but this flat isn't exactly opulent. And his salary is not exactly high for London.
Average house price in Cricklewood (NW2) is £660,000. Average. Is inheritance tax meant to hit average people?
I'm aware that you get this problem with putting any figure as the threshold for inheritance tax, but that number just seems way too low. As I said, I thought the aim was to get money from rich people. When it starts affecting normal people, there's a problem.
Edit:
Could they not make the tax regional to reflect this then?
Edit2:
Or this?
Taxing London, and distributing that to the rest of the country is pretty much how the current setup works. Besides, none of this really matters depending on your goal. The purpose inheritance tax has in the first place is to attempt to fight wealth accumulation. The current rules are for 425k anyway. The 850k limit is under very special circumstances.But that's misleading! As I said in my post above, his property is well below average in his area. The fact that there are loads of cheaper houses in Wales somewhere doesn't make him any better off day to day.
The effect of this tax threshold is going to be:
i) tax paid on massive mansions outside the M25; and
ii) moreorless everyone inside the M25 pays regardless of how big or small their house is.
Again, my understanding is that i) above was the actual aim of this tax. The second effect is basically a by-product that seems unfair, and should be addressed imo.
It's like Mylene Klass bleating about her 2 million quid semi, maybe fucking up the city of London will make all this easier to deal with in future.
I get what Quiche is saying, I live in a very expensive house that isn't worth the money, i don't know if some kind of london exemption is feasible.
Make it a single domestic residence exemption. Inheritance tax is not charged on a single property which is the normal domestic residence of the deceased at the time of death.
Yes, you'd raise a bit less. But it unambiguously solves the problem with house price differentials. London houseowners might be disproportionately paper rich, but they certainly don't feel so, and it *is* a reasonable ask that people feel that they don't have to worry about the fact that if they die their dependents are subsequently kicked out of the area in which they live and have their community and family around. And even if someone doesn't think that is a reasonable ask, they have to accept that it's sufficiently relatable that a policy that goes against it is a hard sell, electorally.
But that's misleading! As I said in my post above, his property is well below average in his area. The fact that there are loads of cheaper houses in Wales somewhere doesn't make him any better off day to day.
The effect of this tax threshold is going to be:
i) tax paid on massive mansions outside the M25; and
ii) moreorless everyone inside the M25 pays regardless of how big or small their house is.
Again, my understanding is that i) above was the actual aim of this tax. The second effect is basically a by-product that seems unfair, and should be addressed imo.
No, but this flat isn't exactly opulent. And his salary is not exactly high for London.
Average house price in Cricklewood (NW2) is £660,000. Average. Is inheritance tax meant to hit average people?
I'm aware that you get this problem with putting any figure as the threshold for inheritance tax, but that number just seems way too low. As I said, I thought the aim was to get money from rich people. When it starts affecting normal people, there's a problem.
Make it a single domestic residence exemption. Inheritance tax is not charged on a single property which is the normal domestic residence of the deceased at the time of death.
Yes, you'd raise a bit less. But it unambiguously solves the problem with house price differentials. London houseowners might be disproportionately paper rich, but they certainly don't feel so, and it *is* a reasonable ask that people feel that they don't have to worry about the fact that if they die their dependents are subsequently kicked out of the area in which they live and have their community and family around. And even if someone doesn't think that is a reasonable ask, they have to accept that it's sufficiently relatable that a policy that goes against it is a hard sell, electorally.
If I've got two houses in different places that add up to the same value as your one massive house, why should you be exempt and I be taxed? Or perhaps I'm not understanding what you mean.
It seems this is what people want. Can I get a £100k tax exemption please? I am poor gimme tax exemptions please.What if we just ask everyone how rich they feel on a scale of 1 to 10 and then tax them accordingly?
You get taxed on rental income on that second home anyway. But seriously though. Crab is right.Nice. Would definitely support the bolded.
Well, everyone has a different idea of what's fair, but personally I think you should be taxed for owning two homes, even if they have a combined value of Mindwipe's one home.
Having a roof over your head is a fundamental human right. Having a second home is an extreme privilege, especially in the UK where house prices are mental and many people are homeless. Again, that's just my view.