chromatic9
Member
Speaking from a german perspective.
I don't think there is a language barrier with most in the EU saying Brexit can't be a success. People outside of britain see Brexit as a decision to purposely hurt yourself. People see the large (mostly economic) ramifications and wonder why anyone would vote for it.
A lot of people also wonder what the goal of Brexit is.
Until now i haven't actually heard one brexiteer tell me what they want to achieve with Brexit other than sovereignty(which is bs as May even said parliament was always sovereign). Is it cutting immigration? Do people think the British economy will develop faster than it is within the singlemarket? Do brexiteers want to negotiate their own trade treaties so bad they want to leave the EU? Do they think local training will be better than it is now because european immigrants don't fill vacancies?
Not judging on anyone that wants to leave but i'd like someone to explain me what exactly they think will be better 10-15 years from now that warrants self harm of leaving because i genuinely can't see it.
Well I was talking about the people at the table and the reply from Mayer about the meeting. Seems to imply Brexit success means Brexit talks a success which it isn't. Junker doesn't have to take affront and just merely say good luck with that. We also had a language barrier problem with article 50 letter although I know some will maintain it's a threat.
About the brexiteers, it's a mixture of some wanting trade deals, some wanting immigration on a requirement basis, not liking what the EU has become and where it's going. The tide changed during the early 90s, a referendum was wanted then when immigration wasn't much, so immigration wasn't the issue for this anti-EU feeling taking shape, people felt we got "sold down the river". The same people who voted in twice during the 70s voted out now. Some also see it as a protest vote, to globalization or how things are going.
How long can UK keep the £? 2020 was stated every EU country needed to be on the euro, I don't see UK holding out much longer. Everyone was quick to point and laugh when the £ dropped but then it was still stronger than the euro at it's lowest so why would UK want that?
Italy want the euro lower than it is now or move to the Lira to attract business. EU said no to the Lira unless you leave like the brits, yet UK was allowed so far to keep the £. Greece has had it suggested to them to leave the euro. It's actually difficult to have a currency suited to 28 countries unless you turn into 28 nation states doing a similar thing, right now its suiting Germany very well. I remember a Europe when each country had their own currency which adjusted to the country. A British style EU would allow Italy the Lira for example.
So while I'm for remaining, the problems are coming. UK has had concessions given which has annoyed the others but UK is holding the project up, the concessions mean UK is at odds with the EU. Brits would be all for a older EU or what David Cameron proposed yet the plans are for deeper integration. It might be best we leave you guys to it and make a start now as I don't see the country giving up the £ and military and the integration Mr Verhofstadt is wanting for better or worse. Perhaps we'll rejoin with our tail between our legs in 20-30 years time and be right onboard with adopting the euro.