supermackem
Banned
What happend to the lib dem, wasnt the buzz in the media that they were going to do better this time or have they i havent been following it as much as some on this thread have.:lol
Xavien said:You see a Lib-Lab coalition would represent the majority of the country, a 37% Conservative minority government would not. Its not disgusting, Tories failed to reach the finish flag, its just how it goes. The people don't have confidence in Tories enough to run the country.
If they had more votes together, they very much could.Acheteedo said:People aren't suggesting that a lib-lab coalition could happen are they? Personally I don't want the tories to have any form of power, but a lib-lab coalition would be disgusting, you can't just ignore the party with the most votes.
maharg said:I don't think he needs to form an actual coalition, just get the support of parliament. The deal doesn't necessarily have to include inclusion in the government, so long as they vote with the government on confidence bills.
(note: I'm not British, but I am Canadian, and our system is essentially your system. Also note that we just went through a similar situation, and the public outcry against a coalition of the 'losers'/left was massive, incredible, and well organized. Don't be surprised if the same happens there, even if it seems in everyone's best interests)
industrian said:Nick Robinson will be found face down in a ditch in the North of England tomorrow. Mandleson hath spoken.
It's quite good, yes, which is why I'm rooting for it.Sh1ner said:Holy shit that sounds like a good thing, am I wrong?
Acheteedo said:People didn't vote for Lib-Lab, they voted for Lib OR Lab. The tories should be the ones making coalitions.
industrian said:I take it you're new to politics.
An even bigger point is you can't ignore a coalition that has hugely more votes. It's an outrage that a government can be formed on so few votes. At least a Lib/Lab coalition will have just over 50% of the popular vote.Acheteedo said:People aren't suggesting that a lib-lab coalition could happen are they? Personally I don't want the tories to have any form of power, but a lib-lab coalition would be disgusting, you can't just ignore the party with the most votes.
Also this election was defined by anti-voting, massive tory gains from people wanting Labour out, and a massive shift away from Lib dem poll results - tactical voting for Labour from people who don't want the Conservative in. It's a mess.
Parl said:An even bigger point is you can't ignore a coalition that has hugely more votes. It's an outrage that a government can be formed on so few votes. At least a Lib/Lab coalition will have just over 50% of the popular vote.
Acheteedo said:People didn't vote for Lib-Lab, they voted for Lib OR Lab. The tories should be the ones making coalitions.
Acheteedo said:Con-lib is what I'm driving at, not conservative alone.
industrian said:30 minutes left at work. Man, it's been a long day. :lol I'm tired as fuck for a guy who's done absolutely nothing except watch the election results.
Acheteedo said:People aren't suggesting that a lib-lab coalition could happen are they? Personally I don't want the tories to have any form of power, but a lib-lab coalition would be disgusting, you can't just ignore the party with the most votes.
Also this election was defined by anti-voting, massive tory gains from people wanting Labour out, and a massive shift away from Lib dem poll results - tactical voting for Labour from people who don't want the Conservative in. It's a mess.
Same as it was at the start of the night really, enough seats for a Lib Dem - Labour coalition followed by electoral reform.scotcheggz said:I like this ladies eyelashes.
So, what would be everyones ideal outcome now? I think its still quite interesting and exciting.
Acheteedo said:Con-lib is what I'm driving at, not conservative alone.
phisheep said:Trouble is, a Lib/Lab coalition still wouldn't be big enough to have a majority.
Only possibility for strong and stable government is Lib/Con
Aaaaaahahahahahaha. Ha. You really ARE new to this, aren't you?Acheteedo said:Con-lib is what I'm driving at, not conservative alone.
Keyser Soze said:Fiona Bruce has regenerated
Acheteedo said:Con-lib is what I'm driving at, not conservative alone.
scotcheggz said:I like this ladies eyelashes.
So, what would be everyones ideal outcome now? I think its still quite interesting and exciting.
Xavien said:Stable yes, Strong no.
Varion said:I'm genuinely interested to hear why anyone thinks there's a chance of a Lib Dem + Conservative coalition. They're just so different to each other in pretty much every policy area the only motivation I can think of for one is MPs being really scared of calling another election so soon and really pissing the public off.
And what on earth could they achieve in a mere year, other than gutting our public services, institutions and the poor? You must really hate the Beeb :lolkowak said:there wont be a coalition, merely liberals agreeing to allow the tories to govern for a year or so.
phisheep said:Depends on the deal.
Potentially it could be one of the great reorming governments to compare with the liberals of the 1830s - but a lot of compromise needed to reach such a deal. Not necessarily bad compromise either.
Varion said:I'm genuinely interested to hear why anyone thinks there's a chance of a Lib Dem + Conservative coalition. They're just so different to each other in pretty much every policy area the only motivation I can think of for one is MPs being really scared of calling another election so soon and really pissing the public off.
industrian said:The final Scottish seat (Argyll and Bute) is scheduled to be called at 12:30 GMT. In all probability it's a safe Liberal Democrat seat. There's the possibility that the Tories may sneak in. I'm praying for LD or SNP.
Dambrosi said:Aaaaaahahahahahaha. Ha. You really ARE new to this, aren't you?
brain_stew said:The Tories have proven a disaster in Scotland so far, we should be OK.