Linkified said:
As currently we can't influence any laws to favour us in the EU.
How uninformed can you be??
An Englishwoman heads the EU's foreign service. The Commission is dominated by people who share the anglo-saxon economic stance. The English have a disproportionately high representation in the civil service. We have our elected officials in the European Parliament. We have our representation in the Council of Ministers. Our influence is huge, even with us not participating in a number of projects.
And the absolute majority of laws that come out of Europe DO favour us; you just don't hear about that because you don't fucking want to.
Yes, I was thinking back to when I studied Economics and how we were told that free trade is trade between countries without the need for protective policies. Which I assumed the EU was beyond but well I guess I thought Humanity was beyond the stage where we gave a damn about how we got ther poducts and services we needed.
You can't have studied very long then because we learned the stages of economic union in the first year [of seven...].
Free Trade is a nebulous term; do you mean no tariffs? Fine, then how do you deal with unfair advantages caused by subsidy? Do you mean tariff and subsidy coordination? Then how do you deal with the fact that individual states can use standards compliance to attain unfair advantage? Do you mean tariff and subsidy coordination with harmonised standards? Then how do you deal with the fact that you don't have a free market without free movement of labour and entrepreneurship? And by the time you have all that, how the fuck do you organise that without a democratic political structure - just like we have with the current EU.
The EU is as it is because all states want the advantages of:
1) Completely free and undistorted trade.
2) Greater negotiating power on the world stage.
3) Greater judicial coordination.
4) Enhanced security through military strategic cooperation and exploitation of economies of scale.
And in order to get the above you need a layer of government to supervise. In order to legitimise the above you need a democratic structure. The EU has both.
On the culture point, we need to protect it just as France and Germany protected theirs, however do I trust anyone to do that, nope.
I came across the below a while ago when I was reading for my degree. Katrin Schmidt hit the nail on the head when she argued that it was European integration which
saved the nation-state following the second great war. In particular though, the EU spends a lot of time trying to preserve local cultural traditions. Even in things as obscure as regional food naming rights; just last month MEPs have lobbied to give PGI status so that you couldn't call a
Cornish Pasty such without it coming from Cornwall, etc.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/3640113721/ref=nosim/gettextbooks_uk-sc-21