Who is reviewing it at GB?
My current meta prediction is 95 with the same scores except Poly being 9/10, GB 5/5 if it's Brad and not Jeff.
Dan's reviewing it
Who is reviewing it at GB?
My current meta prediction is 95 with the same scores except Poly being 9/10, GB 5/5 if it's Brad and not Jeff.
Who is reviewing it at GB?
My current meta prediction is 95 with the same scores except Poly being 9/10, GB 5/5 if it's Brad and not Jeff.
How can you update a 10 to a 10?Lucy O'Brien of IGN tweeted that her review-in-progress of Uncharted 4 goes live in half an hour, does that mean no immediate score? being a review-in-progress?
Aren't the GT guys in the no game will ever get a perfect score camp? So probably not, though maybe they've changed that with them using a star scale now.
Thought that was for MP heavy games only tbh
You know theres gonna be that one shit review that gives it a low score for some bs reason lol.
You know theres gonna be that one shit review that gives it a low score for some bs reason lol.
Dan? 5/5.
Who is reviewing it at GB?
My current meta prediction is 95 with the same scores except Poly being 9/10, GB 5/5 if it's Brad and not Jeff.
Scroll up. This already started with "doing for clicks".Here we go
You know theres gonna be that one shit review that gives it a low score for some bs reason lol.
And I cannot wait for it.You know theres gonna be that one shit review that gives it a low score for some bs reason lol.
LOL
If another review score scenario like the Uncharted 3 one happens.... oh, boy.
![]()
You know theres gonna be that one shit review that gives it a low score for some bs reason lol.
I'm sticking with 90.
With polygon giving it a 7/10![]()
How can you update a 10 to a 10?
What happened ? The game reviewed fairly great: 93 in total.
What happened ? The game reviewed fairly great: 93 in total.
What happened ? The game reviewed fairly great: 93 in total.
See the post above yours. That GIF sums it up.What happened ? The game reviewed fairly great: 93 in total.
The most important thing is sale (don't worry about this one though) because we need to let publishers know that not everygame needs to be open-world with checklist missions
Agree. When QB failed to hit critically, it scared me for the entire linear story-driven action genre set.
Can you imagine being a publisher, putting in tens of millions of dollars into a new IP, which is a single-player only game that takes years to build and 10 hours to complete... and then it reviews only okay and sells only okay, not enough to recoup the budget? Will you ever take that risk again?
And then you read the reviews, and you see the criticisms -- too much like a movie but not a good story... too linear... not enough replay value... no multiplayer.... Gee, I wonder if that'll encourage you to stick to your old open-world IP next time, or focus on online-heavy games?
Not just shooters like Uncharted or QB either. Think back to God of War III. Sweet game, good seller. But it's 6 hours long, ridiculously expensive. Why would you take that risk again in the future?
Shit, Epic even complained about Gears being too risky and expensive, to the point where they went FTP. Ugh.
Man, that reminds me. Unless this scores a perfect 10, some people are going to insist IGN thinks UC4 is worse than UC3.
My Chloe dance gif is ready:
![]()
Aren't the GT guys in the no game will ever get a perfect score camp? So probably not, though maybe they've changed that with them using a star scale now.
Scroll up. This already started with "doing for clicks".
What did EZA give Quantom Break?
4.5 I think, might have been 4.What did EZA give Quantom Break?
Different reviewer tho. Never understood that logic.
Is that Elena? Holy shit, Ellie looks just like her.
My Chloe dance gif is ready:
![]()
Good god.
This is so disturbing