Tywin isn't a usurper.I wonder if Stannis will begin to mistrust Melisandre because Tywin died without any "interference" from her.
We're going to need a new ot before Sunday, has a season of a show ever gotten two ot's?
I wonder if Stannis will begin to mistrust Melisandre because Tywin died without any "interference" from her.
Part 2 of season 5 of Breaking Bad spilled into a second one I believe. We have about 35k posts between the two threads this year though.We're going to need a new ot before Sunday, has a season of a show ever gotten two ot's?
He's going to mistrust her because she's going to try and burn his daughter alive.
George RR Martin's life long masterpiece is going to be ruined because of a TV show.
Now who's fault is that. Gurm's for only writing at home on a word processor? For not writing faster? Gurm's people's fault for not waiting before signing an HBO deal because they foresaw this happening?
Show Stannis only wants to be king (see the Inside the Episode from episode 3 of this season where David spells this out) and does whatever Mel tells him to do. In fact, he's coming to the Wall not to defend the realms of Men, like book Stannis, but because Mel agreed to it.
It's a deviation that changes the core of that character.
Now who's fault is that. Gurm's for only writing at home on a word processor? For not writing faster? Gurm's people's fault for not waiting before signing an HBO deal because they foresaw this happening?
Yeah - the "k Davos guess I won't kill you but I still want to" part of that scene was so bad.Right. That's a scene that's about Stannis coming to the realization that his duty and honor requires him to be defending the realm, not fighting to be king.
Show Stannis only wants to be king (see the Inside the Episode from episode 3 of this season where David spells this out) and does whatever Mel tells him to do. In fact, he's coming to the Wall not to defend the realms of Men, like book Stannis, but because Mel agreed to it.
It's a deviation that changes the core of that character.
To be fair, the reluctant aspect of Stannis's character is present in the show, just very small. When he's talking to Davos in the dungeons of Dragonstone, he says "I never asked for this, no more than I asked to be king", implying he has no actual desire to be king, just that he HAS to be king.
It's his duty.
'If not for my Hand, I might not have come at all. Lord Seaworth is a man of humble birth, but he reminded me of my duty, when all I could think of was my rights. I had the cart before the horse, Davos said. I was trying to win the throne to save the kingdom, when I should have been trying to save the kingdom to win the throne. '
He can't really say this now![]()
'If not for my Hand, I might not have come at all. Lord Seaworth is a man of humble birth, but he reminded me of my duty, when all I could think of was my rights. I had the cart before the horse, Davos said. I was trying to win the throne to save the kingdom, when I should have been trying to save the kingdom to win the throne. '
He can't really say this now![]()
"If not for my Hand, I might not have come at all. Lord Seaworth is a man of humble birth so he can talk to the bankers scum of Braavos..."
Yep, Stannis was never my favorite but the show made him little favors (only the writing though, the actor is quite good).
But when he talks with Davos about the siege where they met and how Robert gave his righful reward to Renly and left him to rot in Dragonstone you could see that Stannis do desires the throne, he sees it as his moment of retribution.
also love when Davos calls out his hypocrisy in supporting Robert over the true targaeyen king.Stannis' desires for the throne are definitely tangled up in a lot of family issues with his brothers. People focus on Stannis' moral code a lot, but his relationship with his brothers is probably just as central to the character, just less overt. Getting the throne makes him finally Robert's equal, after a lifetime of Robert looking down on him. And his younger brother not respecting him either was just salt in the wound. And he latches onto other people as sort of replacement brothers, first with Davos, and then with Jon once he thinks Davos is dead. You can also see his extreme jealousy towards Ned Stark, who in his mind I think basically usurped his place as Robert's brother.
The show never really gets that though. His relationship with Davos feels much less close, his relationship with Robert isn't explored in any particular depth, and he's much less resistant of Melisandre and more willing to bend his morals for religion. He outright denies Melisandre's request to sacrifice Edric in the book, even after two of the three usurpers are dead, whereas in the show he's like SACRIFICE TIME the moment Robb dies.
also love when Davos calls out his hypocrisy in supporting Robert over the true targaeyen king.
Davos is such a boss.
I shall bring justice to Westeros. A thing Ser Axell understands as little as he does war. Claw Isle would gain me naught... and it was evil, just as you said. Celtigar must pay the traitor's price himself, in his own person. And when I come into my kingdom, he shall. Every man shall reap what he has sown, from the highest lord to the lowest gutter rat. And some will lose more than the tips off their fingers, I promise you. They have made my kingdom bleed, and I do not forget that
It is not a question of wanting. The throne is mine, as Robert's heir. That is law. After me, it must pass to my daughter, unless Selyse should finally give me a son. I am king. Wants do not enter into it. I have a duty to my daughter. To the realm. Even to Robert. He loved me but little, I know, yet he was my brother. The Lannister woman gave him horns and made a motley fool of him. She may have murdered him as well, as she murdered Jon Arryn and Ned Stark. For such crimes there must be justice. Starting with Cersei and her abominations. But only starting. I mean to scour that court clean. As Robert should have done after the Trident.
Lord Seaworth is a man of humble birth, but he reminded me of my duty, when all i could think of was my rights. I had the cart before the horse, Davos said. I was trying to win the throne to save the kingdom, when I should have been trying to save the kingdom to win the throne.
I never asked for this crown. Gold is cold and heavy on the head, but so long as I am the king, I have a duty If I must sacrifice one child to the flames to save a million from the dark Sacrifice is never easy, Davos. Or it is no true sacrifice.
Stannis has some amazing quotes. And none are in the show. (yet???)
agreed - and I'd add that you do get to see the inner conflict between his sense of duty to kingdom and to family. Real moral conflict in his mind.I actually think that Stannis' logic in his response to Davos, that family obligation trumps law, ties into all of that, too. Family is really important to Stannis, and that it wasn't important to his brothers I think really messed with him. When he's talking about his duty as king at some point later on, I remember that first on his list, before his duty to the protect the kingdom, he mentions his duty to his daughter to secure her rights as his heir. Stannis talks big game about law and all that, but there's always a really strong current of family running underneath everything.
They really better start mining this conflict in season 5. I mean I can't believe with everything we've talked about in the last few posts, they haven't used ANY of it to create this compelling character we all see in the books.
They really better start mining this conflict in season 5. I mean I can't believe with everything we've talked about in the last few posts, they haven't used ANY of it to create this compelling character we all see in the books.
Well Mel taking Shireen with her is a pretty major change from the books, chances are they'll use that to spark any character change in Stannis.
GRRM seems pretty happy with all the money and extra exposure the show has brought him and his works. If he wants to write at a snails pace and have his life's work finished by HBO that down to him, don't cry for him when it's all in his hands.
I just can't help but think Stannis will break eventually. I don't know what it will be - perhaps the north turning on him to support Rickon, or maybe his southern men abandoning him, or the death of his daughter.
Just because HBO does it a certain way doesn't mean he can't write it the same way he's always wanted to.
I'm not sure the North will turn on him. If they do, "The North Remembers" is a bunch of bullshit.
I just can't help but think Stannis will break eventually. I don't know what it will be - perhaps the north turning on him to support Rickon, or maybe his southern men abandoning him, or the death of his daughter.
Just to be clear, by break do you mean snap? Like "ok, fuck Westeros, I'm taking my revenge on this entire fucking country"?
I hope they leave it a mystery. I would like to read non readers' speculation on where they think he'll end up.
Just to be clear, by break do you mean snap? Like "ok, fuck Westeros, I'm taking my revenge on this entire fucking country"?
Yeah, instead we got beetles monologue...
You want to complain about what might be the show's most spectacular moment?
You just posited two different motivations. He doesn't believe in duty because he made the choice to follow his duty?Concerning Stannis' reluctance, I think that he's far less interested in his duty than he claims. If he didn't want to be king, he would have supported the stronger Renly.
I actually think that Stannis' logic in his response to Davos, that family obligation trumps law, ties into all of that, too. Family is really important to Stannis, and that it wasn't important to his brothers I think really messed with him. When he's talking about his duty as king at some point later on, I remember that first on his list, before his duty to the protect the kingdom, he mentions his duty to his daughter to secure her rights as his heir. Stannis talks big game about law and all that, but there's always a really strong current of family running underneath everything.
Five suitors that she doesn't want? None that she marries? I'm not seeing where this theory suggests happiness for Sansa.Holy shit, I was just made aware of the Ashford theory on Reddit.
She may end up getting everything she wanted in the end.
You just posited two different motivations. He doesn't believe in duty because he made the choice to follow his duty?
Concerning Stannis' reluctance, I think that he's far less interested in his duty than he claims. If he didn't want to be king, he would have supported the stronger Renly.