• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

*UNMARKED SPOILERS ALL BOOKS* Game of Thrones |OT| - Season 5 Offseason Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Turin

Banned
ULEegzZ.gif


But anyway, this Linda person piqued my curiosity so I looked her up. She's definitely an idiot and pretty demented but I kind of pity her.
 

NeoGiff

Member
After finding out both that latest Hardhome tidbit (which could disprove the whole elaborate rumour) and which book character
meets an untimely demise
, I've decided to go Unsullied for the last few weeks before the season. My balls are up for the taking.

And on the Linda thing, I do value and enjoy both her and Elio's vast knowledge and insight into the world of the books... I just don't think Linda is a very nice person, or agree with 90% of what she says.
 

-griffy-

Banned
Wait, the co-founder of Westeros.org and co-author, with GRRM, of the encyclopedia-like The World of Ice and Fire hasn't read the Red Wedding chapter?
 
The Season 5 world premier is in London tomorrow so hopefully some episode 1 details trickle out from there. And I think a trailer came out the same day of the premier last year so maybe that will happen again this year.
 

DKehoe

Member
If only they could have put that time, money and effort into Bloodraven instead, rather than giving us Tree-Saruman.

"Thousand eyes and one" makes no sense with the show version of Bloodraven. I was really looking forward to seeing how they portrayed him and it was such a disappointment.
 

-griffy-

Banned
I think you guys are slightly missing what they did to her face. They made it look non-human, the bone structure is a bit different, eyes that are farther apart, etc. Not something you can do with makeup. The end result though is we only see her face on screen clearly in this one shot pretty much, so there isn't much there to spot that stuff anyways.

WKznhcb.png

9tpTNfl.png
 

Real Hero

Member
both the children and blood raven looked crap. Just seemed like they knew they would barely show them so they didn't put that much effort into them, especially compared to the amazing dragons and white walkers and stuff.
 

fallengorn

Bitches love smiley faces
If you didn't show me the before and after side-by-side, I wouldn't know they did any post effects at all.

It seems like they just made her face more cherubic.
 

RatskyWatsky

Hunky Nostradamus
They made it look non-human, the bone structure is a bit different, eyes that are farther apart, etc. Not something you can do with makeup.

What? No they didn't. She still looks like a regular human, just more childlike.

I do see the differences now that there are comparison pics, but I still think this could have been achieved with make up (I seen some shit on those youtube tutorials!).
 

-griffy-

Banned
What? No they didn't. She still looks like a regular human, just more childlike.

I do see the differences now that there are comparison pics, but I still think this could have been achieved with make up (I seen some shit on those youtube tutorials!).

Yes they did, they widened the upper part of her face and narrowed the lower part of her face, and made her eyes farther apart to an extent beyond what is normal for a human. It's subtle for sure, but subtly non-human. Just to the point that it looks strange but not unnatural, which I'm sure was the intent. Makeup only adds to what is there, no amount of makeup will move an actor's eyeballs or narrow bone structure. It's one of the limitations of makeup, you can't take away.
 

Iksenpets

Banned
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/03/17/game-thrones-showrunners

New interview with D&D + Cogman. Nothing too much new. They seem pretty bullish on Lena Headey's performance this season, and pretty excited about Dorne. Their comment that Jon admires both Mance and Stannis but is frustrated by their stubbornness inspires a bit of confidence for those relationships. The main thing I noted is that
they say winter is still confined to Northern areas, which would seem to imply that the shot of Brienne in the snow in the trailer really is in the North, instead of her seeing snow in the Riverlands.

CwAkE9q.png


I fucking you people for convincing me to read these books so many years ago.


Him saying he doesn't want to celebrate prematurely is better than him shooting it down altogether and saying that he's not actually close to the end! Keep hope alive!
 

gutshot

Member
Guys, I've managed to remain spoiler-free on this upcoming season and have only watched the initial trailer so far. This is the most unspoiled I will go into a season ever and I can't wait to be completely surprised a la the White Walker baby scene last year.

IS IT APRIL YET?
 

Loke13

Member
Guys, I've managed to remain spoiler-free on this upcoming season and have only watched the initial trailer so far. This is the most unspoiled I will go into a season ever and I can't wait to be completely surprised a la the White Walker baby scene last year.

IS IT APRIL YET?
You might want to leave this thread then.
 

RatskyWatsky

Hunky Nostradamus
Yes they did, they widened the upper part of her face and narrowed the lower part of her face, and made her eyes farther apart to an extent beyond what is normal for a human.

It's subtle for sure, but subtly non-human. Just to the point that it looks strange but not unnatural, which I'm sure was the intent.

Eh, "beyond normal for a human" ≠ "non-human". I think they did a good job with the giants - they're clearly different from humans (they're not just really tall people, in other words) - but I think they did a poor job with the Children of the Forest. They (or rather, just Leaf right now) look just like human children (with an ever so vaguely different facial appearance, I'll grant you).
 
I think you guys are slightly missing what they did to her face. They made it look non-human, the bone structure is a bit different, eyes that are farther apart, etc. Not something you can do with makeup. The end result though is we only see her face on screen clearly in this one shot pretty much, so there isn't much there to spot that stuff anyways.

WKznhcb.png

9tpTNfl.png
They made her look like a different human, but still human. I'm sure they could have cast someone with features pretty much indistinguishable from that.
I didn't catch that it wasn't just a plain old girl in makeup when I first saw it and I doubt anyone else did either.

Is there an extra which shows how they used advanced CGI to make one old guy slumped against a tree look like a different old guy slumped against a tree for Bloodraven?
 

Euron

Member
Ok so...is it confirmed that the
"leaked" details about Tormund's death and the Night's King at Hardhome
were fake? I'm not sure how I feel about that. It actually seemed like a really cool scenario.
 

joliefaire

Neo Member
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/03/17/game-thrones-showrunners

New interview with D&D + Cogman. Nothing too much new. The main thing I noted is that
they say winter is still confined to Northern areas, which would seem to imply that the shot of Brienne in the snow in the trailer really is in the North, instead of her seeing snow in the Riverlands.

We've been discussing this very thing at another board. One of our members emailed Hibbard asking if he deliberately typed 'North' rather than 'north' or 'northern.' He answered back pretty quickly that he shouldn't have capitalized North and he's changed it to read 'north,' meaning generally the northern part of Westeros. So, Brienne could well be in the Riverlands, the Vale or who-knows-where.
 

Iksenpets

Banned
Ok so...is it confirmed that the
"leaked" details about Tormund's death and the Night's King at Hardhome
were fake? I'm not sure how I feel about that. It actually seemed like a really cool scenario.

Show Hardhome spoiler:
Seems that way, unless this guy very convincingly bullshitted the Watchers staff into thinking he's legit. They back him up, and he says that both that spoiler, and the one about Jon dying at Hardhome and being taken away by the White Walkers are false. And I agree. It's the sort of spoiler I wanted to believe, because it sounded great. All the trailer clips look really cool though, so I still have hope.

We've been discussing this very thing at another board. One of our members emailed Hibbard asking if he deliberately typed 'North' rather than 'north' or 'northern.' He answered back pretty quickly that he shouldn't have capitalized North and he's changed it to read 'north,' meaning generally the northern part of Westeros. So, Brienne could well be in the Riverlands, the Vale or who-knows-where.


Interesting. I don't like the idea of Brienne going North, just because it seems like that would mean the Brotherhood plot is probably cut, or at least significantly reduced, and I think that would feel like a kind of big loose end. Also, Brienne in the North sounds like a death sentence for Stannis. D:
 
Yes they did, they widened the upper part of her face and narrowed the lower part of her face, and made her eyes farther apart to an extent beyond what is normal for a human. It's subtle for sure, but subtly non-human. Just to the point that it looks strange but not unnatural, which I'm sure was the intent. Makeup only adds to what is there, no amount of makeup will move an actor's eyeballs or narrow bone structure. It's one of the limitations of makeup, you can't take away.

The children of the forest are animes, canonical & confirmed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom