biosnake20
Member
Cersei is more sympathetic to book readers but I doubt there are many show watchers that think similarly.
With the prophecy cut, and Lena's smug smile, it's pretty much impossible for them to.Cersei is more sympathetic to book readers but I doubt there are many show watchers that think similarly.
The problem of books 4 and 5 were the bloat. If books 4 and 5 were condensed down to 1 book and the climaxes of the books weren't cut out and put into book 6, that would make for one fantastic book. Every bit as good as Storm of Swords.
I liked the last episode but it was only good, it should be great. It should be emmy award quality.
Lurking the unsullied thread I'm reminded that people seem to bring up Jaime pushing Bran out of the window as the worst thing he's done. Not killing Ned's men, not murdering the crap out of his poor cousin, but pushing a boy out a window who then gets superpowers and can access the tree internet (treenternet?) is the worst thing he's done.
poor show Jaime ;_;
With the prophecy cut, and Lena's smug smile, it's pretty much impossible for them to.
The prophecy was always weak and unnecessary though imo. It wasn't needed in the book, and it wasn't surprising to hear it didn't really land in the show because it just doesn't add anything that isn't already explained by her experiences.
Painting D&D as assholes for killing a character that's probably gonna die soon anyway is pretty ridiculous.
As are some weird complaints. Cersei sympathetic? Lol wat?
I'm in agreement with this. Cersei getting her comeuppance in the books was glorious. The cruelty she inflicted on people eclipsed anything Joffrey ever did imo. At least Joff kind of had the excuse of being a pyschopath. Everything Cersei did, the people she had tortured or handed to Quyburn(spelling?) to do whatever twisted shit he did to them, was all because she is paranoid about maintaining her position. We have the advantage of being privy to her inner monologue in the books and can see how clever she thinks she's being.Why is that ridiculous? It's ridiculous to build up a character then take him out before his best moments. Even non-book readers in the other thread thought it was odd the character didn't amount to anything.
Cersei is sympathetic. Every decision she makes, she makes for her kids. I don't even get the sense that she's that power hungry in the show. She wants Myrcella out of Dorne, and the show has proven that her concerns are valid, because there are top people in Dorne that want to dismember her. Even if she lied to Jaime, it was a good lie to get her daughter out of danger. Margaery isn't as sweet and innocent as she is in the books. She's a bit of a schemer herself. She's clearly manipulating Tommen, she also mocks Cersei to her face, and then there's the prophecy about a younger queen/her dead kids. I understand why she might not want her around Tommen.
Cersei finally getting what was coming to her was a feel good moment in the book. In the show, I might just feel sorry for her.
The book story is leading up to a pay-off for multiple characters, like the war for Selmy, even if it does that with a fairly boring couple of chapters. The show story is leading many characters to a wimper.The show story is better than the book story at this point. The Red Viper was GRRM's last hurrah...it's all down hill from there.
I'm in agreement with this. Cersei getting her comeuppance in the books was glorious. The cruelty she inflicted on people eclipsed anything Joffrey ever did imo. At least Joff kind of had the excuse of being a pyschopath. Everything Cersei did, the people she had tortured or handed to Quyburn(spelling?) to do whatever twisted shit he did to them, was all because she is paranoid about maintaining her position. We have the advantage of being privy to her inner monologue in the books and can see how clever she thinks she's being.
When Jaime crumpled up her letter and threw it in the fire I did a Nelson Muntz laugh in my head. I don't hate show Cersei anywhere near so much.
This is pretty much the same as how most book readers react to him.Lurking the unsullied thread I'm reminded that people seem to bring up Jaime pushing Bran out of the window as the worst thing he's done. Not killing Ned's men, not murdering the crap out of his poor cousin, but pushing a boy out a window who then gets superpowers and can access the tree internet (treenternet?) is the worst thing he's done.
poor show Jaime ;_;
https://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/...ast-for-crows-a-terrible-waste-of-1000-pages/ - great summary of Feast's problems
https://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/...ter-proof-the-books-will-never-be-good-again/ - great summary of Dance's problems and strengths
Has never been and never will be true. Too many illogical, inconsistent moments and bad writing for that to happen.The show story is better than the book story at this point. The Red Viper was GRRM's last hurrah...it's all down hill from there.
It's not really. We knew she didn't kill her the moment Brienne cried out a word at the end of that chapter. The 'drama' is, "Is she going to kill Jaime or not?" Probably not, but Jaime's important, no? And seeing how that's going to unfold in the books is going to be more interesting than anything which happend in dorne or Meereen, or Quentyn's fruitless mission, or when Missandei kissed Grey Worm, or however many minutes of whore's tits we're treated to.Hulk on point, as usual. A fuckin' ballerina, that guy.
It's definitely true that most of the pleasure I've gotten out of AFFC and ADWD has been external to the works themselves. Wild speculations about Euron = Daario, joking about fat pink masts, digging on the Great Northern Conspiracy, etc. The books just accomplished so little in all those pages.
The bit about resolving drama offscreen or too late is particularly resonant. It's why I don't mind ditching Lady Stoneheart at all. She's super cool when you talk about her, disconnected from the timeline of the book, but she's pretty flat in the books. Like. Aside from being a menacing presence, her whole drama has been "is she going to kill Brienne or not" which I don't particularly care about, Brienne doesn't matter: the whole world 'bout to be besieged by ancient ice demons from out of nightmares anyway.
The books are so bad about stakes. The show is better but still kind of bad. Remember when we went to Ice Mordor and saw Ice Daddy create lil Ice Baby? That was cool and menacing and bonkers and -- it's been completely abandoned.
Has never been and never will be true. Too many illogical, inconsistent moments and bad writing for that to happen.
But what is there is basically the same up until now. If the book was the same Tyrion would have 2-3 chapters and they would be just as boring if not more so. It's still Tyrion whining while being dragged around.Tyrion's arc in Show after escaping is better than anything GRRM did with him over two books.
Care to name some? There are some characters that get some great elaboration, but I would like to know which plots they consider better.The last two books really weren't that great. You can just see the change from A Storm of Swords to A Feast for Crows. Very bloated, with I suspect a lot of red herrings which is why I think the show has streamlined a lot.
I swear I read somewhere that GRRM had gotten rid of his editor for the first 3 books, and went a different way for the 4th and 5th so maybe that's why. As a fan, I appreciate both the show and the books, but I've found those that read the books first, absolutely consider the show inferior in every way, while a lot of show watchers who read the books end up thinking that the show did a lot of storylines better. I wish I hadn't read the books after the Red Wedding season, because all I do now, is notice inconsistencies, things that are cut or changed from the books.
The last two books really weren't that great. You can just see the change from A Storm of Swords to A Feast for Crows. Very bloated, with I suspect a lot of red herrings which is why I think the show has streamlined a lot.
I swear I read somewhere that GRRM had gotten rid of his editor for the first 3 books, and went a different way for the 4th and 5th so maybe that's why. As a fan, I appreciate both the show and the books, but I've found those that read the books first, absolutely consider the show inferior in every way, while a lot of show watchers who read the books end up thinking that the show did a lot of storylines better. I wish I hadn't read the books after the Red Wedding season, because all I do now, is notice inconsistencies, things that are cut or changed from the books.
Care to name some? There are some characters that get some great elaboration, but I would like to know which plots they consider better.
Brienne x Hound was dumb, Oberyn is liked by readers, Theon has the best arc in Dance, they liked the removal of the Kingsmoot so they forgave how mishandled the Ironborn have been in general I guess. Jaime and Bronn was a good change that made sense but is hardly a plot.Off the top of my head, I know they absolutely loved Brienne and the Hound, they loved how Oberyn was portrayed, they liked how Ramsay and Theon are playing out and they absolutely love the fact that the Greyjoys and the Kingsmoot stuff has been seemingly cut out. A few talked about that added Bran storyline at Crasters etc. I've also heard that they liked Jaime and Bronn training together. This season, with even more deviation, will be interesting to see what they think.
Naturally I don't agree. I often wish the show was two episodes bigger a season now so they can add more, but I know they barely are able to do ten episodes.
While combining the 2 and cutting out 300-400 pages might make for a better read, it would have resulted in a 10 year wait for 1 book.
No it doesnt. I was disappointed but than realized it was essentially the other half of Feast. Though the time it's taking for Winds is incredibly disappointing.This was also the argument that led to cutting out the end of ADWD and pushing it into the next book. But really, we have no one but GRRM to blame here for not writing faster/more efficiently. That was what was so sad about ADWD, it was the confirmation that AFFC was not a fluke and that there was likely no turnaround for this series coming.
Im not sure how people tolerate this gimmick.https://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/...ast-for-crows-a-terrible-waste-of-1000-pages/ - great summary of Feast's problems
https://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/...ter-proof-the-books-will-never-be-good-again/ - great summary of Dance's problems and strengths
So now they're assholes? Ok.Why is that ridiculous? It's ridiculous to build up a character then take him out before his best moments. Even non-book readers in the other thread thought it was odd the character didn't amount to anything.
Look maybe she's MORE sympathetic, but no one is gonna cry for her. If you do well... good for you I guess, but you'll be in the minority. People hate her guts.Cersei is sympathetic. Every decision she makes, she makes for her kids. I don't even get the sense that she's that power hungry in the show. She wants Myrcella out of Dorne, and the show has proven that her concerns are valid, because there are top people in Dorne that want to dismember her. Even if she lied to Jaime, it was a good lie to get her daughter out of danger. Margaery isn't as sweet and innocent as she is in the books. She's a bit of a schemer herself. She's clearly manipulating Tommen, she also mocks Cersei to her face, and then there's the prophecy about a younger queen/her dead kids. I understand why she might not want her around Tommen.
Cersei finally getting what was coming to her was a feel good moment in the book. In the show, I might just feel sorry for her.
It'd be a big mistake to cut Arya's wolf dream out.I really want to see Nymeria this season
Im not sure how people tolerate this gimmick.
The last two books really weren't that great. You can just see the change from A Storm of Swords to A Feast for Crows. Very bloated, with I suspect a lot of red herrings which is why I think the show has streamlined a lot.
The problem is the show is streamlining while simultaneously treading water and waiting for the next book. This is why we are getting storylines like Jaime and Bronn going south, which as a book reader we know is going to lead absolutely nowhere.
I agree AFFC and ADWD were mostly poor, so the show is in theory improving things. It just can't do it in a way that progresses the story.
Hopefully from here we get a four episode Arya training montage, which is the only interesting thing left that happens, leading up to a finale with Jon having his troubles and lady stoneheart rocking up out of nowhere to show that he'll push through it.
I don't think they are waiting for the next book at all. Storylines are being merged to make the show more compact, not to tread water.
So why haven't we seen Bran and why are Jaime and Bronn dicking around in Dorne? Why is Jon going beyond the wall to gather clans?
Granted they can tread water and have plotlines that go nowhere and still be 100% faithful at this point, but I'm expecting them to add even more filler so they don't have to reveal anything new.
You're making way too many assumptions about where any of these TV series plot threads are heading. Of the things you mention, Bran's absence is the only one that really supports the idea that they are stalling, and even that is easily explained by him simply being too far ahead of the other characters.
https://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/...ast-for-crows-a-terrible-waste-of-1000-pages/ - great summary of Feast's problems
https://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/...ter-proof-the-books-will-never-be-good-again/ - great summary of Dance's problems and strengths
I don't read asoiaf for the big surprises. I care about the characters and i care about the world. Feast was the book of the smallfolk and i love it for that, if everything was an adrenaline ride i would have dropped the series long ago, the big moments need to be earned to be meaningful otherwise i would be watching fucking spartacus. He's right about the use of cliffhangers though.MARTIN PERHAPS WORK BEST AS NARRATIVE DAREDEVIL. HIS HUGE RISKS PRETTY WELL-KNOWN AT THIS POINT AND THEY JUSTIFIABLY LAUDED/HATED. HULK SURMISE THAT THE RISKS IN THRONES WORK BEST BECAUSE THAT BOOK SET UP FAIRLY STANDARD NARRATIVE AND WHEN EVERYTHING GO TO SHIT, IT TRULY RESONATE BECAUSE IT BOTH NEW AND UNEXPECTED. BUT THEN THE OTHER BOOKS COME ALONG AND MARTIN NOT AFRAID GO DEEPER DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE AND TORTURE/KILL OFF MORE BELOVED CHARACTERS IN UNCEREMONIOUS WAYS.
Why is that ridiculous? It's ridiculous to build up a character then take him out before his best moments. Even non-book readers in the other thread thought it was odd the character didn't amount to anything.
ADwD is a structural nightmare, though. Martin should have stuck with his original plans to only focus on the non-Feast characters and end on both battles. By reintroducing the Feast characters midway through, it becomes bloated and directionless, and delaying the battles robs it of any climax. I still enjoyed it, but only as part of the series rather than a complete novel in its own right.
What bothered me the most about AFFC and ADWD is that in AFFC George basically said "I'm tired of all the popular characters so fuck you readers, here's a whole book of campy Dorne and bleak Iron islands!" and with ADWD he said "So, you didn't like all the world bulding and different scenarios? Then take half a book of your favorite character Tyrion drinking, puking and having dirty thoughts with septas!!!!". I think they would have worked way better if T+J+D had some chapters in AFFC and he had put some of the Iron Islands and Brienne chapters in ADWD.
Pretty much. I'm sure somebody has worked out a chapter sequence that worked better, but AFFC was just too much of a non-event (By comparison).
The next season must be basically written by this point, hope of waiting for the next book before a TV adaptation is surely lost
Yeah, a lot of people did that and it made the books better. I liked this one.
My girlfriend did consider me a bit crazy,reading two books at the same time and switching between them every 30 minutes. :lol
it simply can't be worse than tha books. can it be sillier? dumber? sure, pretty much guaranteed. but it won't be worse.