BronsonLee
Member
be the change you wish to see in the world
Stump I can't turn into an electric car
be the change you wish to see in the world
This makes no sense.Should I have to give up my business just because I had cancer 10 years ago? What is your solution to people like me?
What discussion? As soon as another opinion arrives, you pile-on and start throwing ad hominem at people. This is why you lost in November.
This makes no sense.
This makes no sense.
This makes no sense.
Id like to know more about all of this but it seems like its impossible to find anything that doesnt say this is the greatest thing ever or this is the worst thing ever.
Why do some people say obamacare was failing?
Why do some people say majority of people paid the pebalty vs enrolling in healthcare?
Why do some people say there were areas in the country where there was only one choice or no providers for healthcare in some areas of the country?
Why do some people say this will lead to x million people dying?
Why do some people say that this is cruel or wrong?
I am curious what happens when republicans go after Medicare next.
Pre-existing conditions. Did you read any of the bill or summaries of it?This makes no sense.
If you do not understand the question, then you have no damn excuse for all the hate you are deservedly getting.
I can only have my business because of Obamacare.
LITERALLY THE ONLY REASON.
Just get a job, dummy.
Problem solved!
Oh, he's banned.
Maybe he'll find a job for you, friend.
Nah he should move to a state that would cover him
Trying to find that tweet where it explains how they plan on "recovering costs" by "lowkey" hoping people die after this passes.
Help please?
Canada is not part of the United States.
Trying to find that tweet where it explains how they plan on "recovering costs" by "lowkey" hoping people die after this passes.
Help please?
Here you go.
That's fucking horrifying.
Hey that's disrespectful to all the jews who died in WWIII thought our conversation with the Nazi supporter was going good though
I thought our conversation with the Nazi supporter was going good though
Hey that's disrespectful to all the jews who died in WWII
As a second point,no jews were targeted in WWII it's a liberal false flag from the leftist media. /s
People shouldn't be forced to have health care if they (for whatever reason) don't want it. If you want your choice of care, get a job. Obviously people with disabilities and illnesses that prohibit labor are an exception, and deserve assistance.
Is he already on voat?
Because I'm not part of the hivemind? This is /pol/ levels of stupidity.
Anyone arguing that healthcare should be left to free market doesn't understand economics.
Healthcare insurance is inelastic and demand changes based on age, condition, etc.
Regulation is needed and is the cheapest, fairest, most efficient option.
The alternative is poor people die, middle class people go broke, and only the rich can afford treatment.
Is he already on voat?
If the gilded age wasn't enough to prove to Americans that the "free market will regulate itself" is a laughable statement I don't know what will.The free market, in real terms, is monied interests.
It is, in a very true sense, the same corrosive problems of ego, greed, and control people attack Communism and Socialism for. The only difference being is that you can see a man at the heart of what ruined both of those; the free market is an abstraction metastasized around its invisible walls, but those walls are never the "true" market.
Funny how reification works to see the outside model as bad and the inside model as just, in reference to a self.
When you commodify health, you are commodifying life and death. The market will only look for ways to make money first, and actual nourishment of life second. End of. In fact, you can say Capitalism intrinsically skews this way, as the world of the 21st century has learned.
If the gilded age wasn't enough to prove to Americans that the "free market will regulate itself" is a laughable statement I don't know what will.
Then again I had someone in one of my college classes once bitch that we had to learn about history and say it won't help anyone ever and he was a Trump supporter so I mean, I doubt many of them know history beyond the very basics, let alone take lessons from it.
Chance this passes the Senate?
Removal of the changes that got the house freedom caucus on board. Or a rules change in the Senate.So what changes would have to be made for it to fall under reconcilation since that's not expected with the current version?
Removal of the changes that got the house freedom caucus on board. Or a rules change in the Senate.
Which changes got the house freedom caucus on board (a link to the info will be fine)?
It's not a sure thing, but McConnell seemed to shoot down the idea of ending the filibuster a couple days ago.
This makes no sense.
I just wish Nurse Anesthesia existed in Canada. Move there in a heartbeat if it did.
I am curious what happens when republicans go after Medicare next.
Can somebody explain something to me?
Before Obamacare, wasn't there a huge issue with insurance companies charging ridiculous premiums for pre-existing conditions or not providing coverage at all?
If that's true, is there any basis for the Republican line of "We don't think our states will do that?"
I've only been keeping up with stuff for a year now so I don't know what it was like back then. It just seems like they are flat out lying. Is that an incorrect assessment?
The original AHCA set aside $130 billion over 10 years for a state stability fund. That fund wasn't explicitly earmarked for high-risk pools, but they were among the functions for which the states could use the funding. Also, a new amendment from Rep. Fred Upton would add another $8 billion to this funding over five years.
Ryan and others have cited state iterations of high-risk pools as a model for the AHCA. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health policy think tank, however, these high-risk pools were woefully underfunded, prohibitively expensive, and few people signed up for them.
Larry Levitt, a senior vice president at Kaiser, said based on old experiences and the number of people with preexisting conditions, high-risk pools need a lot of money put toward them to be effective.
"Even under pretty conservative estimates, a minimally adequate high-risk pool could cost $25 billion per year nationwide," Levitt tweeted Wednesday.
Even an estimated from conservative analysts James C. Capretta and Tom Miller said that in order to operate functional high-risk pools in all 50 states, the federal government would need to provide $15 billion to $20 billion annually, leaving the AHCA short even with the proposed money from Upton's amendment.
A separate analysis from Emily Gee and Topher Spiro at the liberal Center for American Progress found that high-risk pools would need $327 billion over 10 years, leaving the AHCA well short under the current plan.
Can somebody explain something to me?
Before Obamacare, wasn't there a huge issue with insurance companies charging ridiculous premiums for pre-existing conditions or not providing coverage at all?
If that's true, is there any basis for the Republican line of "We don't think our states will do that?"
I've only been keeping up with stuff for a year now so I don't know what it was like back then. It just seems like they are flat out lying. Is that an incorrect assessment?
Nurse Anesthesia?
https://twitter.com/philipaklein/status/860211993571098624
womp womp
Again the whole thing is just a ploy to kick it back and forth so it ends in finger pointing for blame.
Chance this passes the Senate?