• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

US Open 2016 [OT] Bodies ache, but New York will not wait. [Tennis]

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MIMIC

Banned
If Venus didn't challenge I was going to throw something

EDIT: Welp, there it is :(

Still, that was a great tiebreak. Valiant effort by Venus though.
 
N

Niraj

I shot people I like more for less.
Pliskova's first major quarterfinal. Backing up that Cincinnati title so far.

Surprised Stan lost the third set, hope he gets through in the fourth.
 
K

Kotetsu534

Member
Serena has faced 1 break point all tournament, and has not been broken at all. Utter domination on serve. Good luck Simona.
 
D

Diamond

Member
After this Nishikori-Karlovic match, you have to wonder why "return bot" isn't a term as often used as serve bot.
 
J

John Dunbar

correct about everything
for like two and a half games it seemed like dimitrov might actually make a match out of this. better than expected.
 
D

Diamond

Member
I don't get why Dimitrov doesn't try to finish the points quicker. With long rallies he'll make one nice point once or twice but 95% of the time Murray will be better.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Diamond said:
I don't get why Dimitrov doesn't try to finish the points quicker. With long rallies he'll make one nice point once or twice but 95% of the time Murray will be better.
Click to expand...

I've never liked dimitrov but at least he used to be an attacking player once. I have no idea what his game plan is any more - I hate to use the term pusher for any player that isn't Monfils, but Dimitrov has to be approaching that.
 
D

Diamond

Member
Well I guess we can't have competitive tennis every night...
As Crab said Dimitrov seems to have zero answers to Murray's game. Given their last encounters I wasn't expecting that.
 
N

Niraj

I shot people I like more for less.
Pretty dull match, but they can't all be winners. Hopefully Nishikori does a bit better, but I think it'll be an easy Murray win.
 
M

MIMIC

Banned
This is the same guy who easily dismissed Murray at Wimbledon a few years ago.

WTF was that? Murray literally pushed Dimitrov to death until he imploded.
 
N

Niraj

I shot people I like more for less.
Disappointing result for Radwanska, but not too surprised. Konjuh probably would have won their Wimbledon match if she didn't roll her ankle.
 
K

Kotetsu534

Member
Konjuh won 30/35 points behind her first serve, or 86% with around 60% in play. Even winning only 40% of 2nd serve points, that level of dominance against an opponent who relies on their return game is impressive. An entirely different task awaits her against Pliskova, who has a dominant serve of her own. I wonder if she'll progress up the rankings like Bencic and Bouchard - a bit worrying that she's already had elbow surgery, given how many injuries the young women seem to get (think Keys, Bencic, Muguruza, etc.).
 
D

Diamond

Member
Kotetsu534 said:
Konjuh won 30/35 points behind her first serve, or 86% with around 60% in play. Even winning only 40% of 2nd serve points, that level of dominance against an opponent who relies on their return game is impressive. An entirely different task awaits her against Pliskova, who has a dominant serve of her own. I wonder if she'll progress up the rankings like Bencic and Bouchard - a bit worrying that she's already had elbow surgery, given how many injuries the young women seem to get (think Keys, Bencic, Muguruza, etc.).
Click to expand...

It's the same with the men (Coric, Kyrgios, Thiem). Now that the game is the most physical it has ever been, it seems that players must have matured physically to endure the tour rythm week after week.
 
M

Milchmann

Member
Angie struggled with Vinci's slice in the first set and didn't know what to do. Now both players seem to know that Vinci can't win in three sets.
 
S

Simply Sami

Member
Not surprised. Few people overrated Pouille. Lots of average players have beaten Nadal in slams. Pouille just about managed to get in the third round to play him.

Also credit to Monfils. He is having a fine year.
 
J

John Dunbar

correct about everything
Simply Sami said:
Not surprised. Few people overrated Pouille. Lots of average players have beaten Nadal in slams. Pouille just about managed to get in the third round to play him.

Also credit to Monfils. He is having a fine year.
Click to expand...

pouille also made the quarter at wimbledon, so it's too early to call it a fluke. the main reason why he lost so easily was because he had played three five-set matches in a row before this. dude had no legs.
 
P

perfectchaos007

Member
post tropical storm Hermine is stationed just off long island. Thats causing NYC to get some strong winds and rain. If it weren't for the roof, not much play would get in today as matches on all other courts are suspended atm
 
RedAssedApe

RedAssedApe

Banned
clemenx said:
Gael Monfils Grand Slam Champion.

I need this in my life.
Click to expand...

i'd pay to see that celebration

giphy.gif
 
S

Simply Sami

Member
John Dunbar said:
pouille also made the quarter at wimbledon, so it's too early to call it a fluke. the main reason why he lost so easily was because he had played three five-set matches in a row before this. dude had no legs.
Click to expand...

Well if he played better in his first two games then he wouldn't have that problem. I didn't call it a fluke. I said reaching two quarters at 22 and doing nothing the rest of the year isn't enough to be called a future grand slam champion. Del Potro beating peak Federer and Nadal at 21, winning a slam and reaching finals that year was impressive. The great players are always consistent from a young age.

Monfils exposed his weakness, so give him credit.
 
J

John Dunbar

correct about everything
Simply Sami said:
Well if he played better in his first two games then he wouldn't have that problem. I didn't call it a fluke. I said reaching two quarters at 22 and doing nothing the rest of the year isn't enough to be called a future grand slam champion. Del Potro beating peak Federer and Nadal at 21, winning a slam and reaching finals that year was impressive. The great players are always consistent from a young age.

Monfils exposed his weakness, so give him credit.
Click to expand...

it's always pointless to seriously call someone a future slam champion, and monfils was clearly better, but the point is that pouille has clearly improved very quickly and it remains to be seen if he can keep doing so. he did it the hard way this time and didn't have enough in the tank to keep going, but maybe he gets better and won't have to do that next time. or maybe he follows someone like dimitrov and this is his "peak."

but i think you're pretty much dead wrong about great players always being consistent from a young age, especially since we seem to be defining great players as grand slam champions. wawrinka is a two time slam champion but he was 27 or 28 when he made his first slam semi. later bloomers are a thing. even federer only made 2 quarters before he won his first slam.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

What actually happened to Warren Ellis?
14
1K
CGNoire replied
Andy Serkis, Ben Starr, Jennifer English, and Charlie Cox join the cast of The Clair Obscur: Expedition 33.
News Trailer 2
58
2K
DelireMan7 replied
Persona 5: The Phantom X New Gameplay Footage, Characters Revealed
News Trailer
10
2K
Thick Thighs Save Lives replied
Napoleon Bonaparte: History's Greatest Simp
31
6K
dead monkey uk replied
Starfield Shattered Space |OT| Is that the Great Serpent or are you just happy to see me?
2 3 4 5 6
264
12K
March Climber replied
Top Bottom