Tarzan last year did quite well I believe.
i didnt watched tarzan, but im pretty sure it was profitable, no idea what the heck are you talking about
I think it has less to do with old movie franchises (although I don't think you can use the word "franchise" for straight up remakes of one-off films) and more that all those revivals have been terrible. The best thing about Ben-Hur was the 1000 gamerscore I got for beating the tie-in game in less than two hours. Everything else was paint-by-numbers derivative sequences from better films.
I'm so happy Baby Driver did well. Edgar Wright finally vindicated.
Also, I keep asking myself what the hell Girl Trip is. Did that even release overseas? We have this movie playing now that's called Girl's Night Out, but apparently that is Rough Night?
See that WW box office? The Alien franchise (unfortunately) isn't dead yet.
Mother! is likely to be one of the best/most interesting films this year though. That alone beats out Universal and Sony's upcoming line-up for me (and Fox probably as well, considering a new Aronofsky is way more exciting to me than Kingsman 2, even though I loved the first one).
Alien: Covenant $74M $233M $97M
What is going on over there? Jeez.
I'm certainly no expert but how does this equate to a franchise killer?
Studios get about 55% of the domestic gross, 40% of the overseas gross, and 25% of China's gross.
For franchises, you also have to consider trends. Covenant wasn't a bomb, but it made just over half of what Prometheus did. Do they make a third film and risk another 40% drop? Covenant wasnt exactly well received.
Unless someone wants to make a $50M Alien film, it might be best to let the franchise lie for a decade or so.
Why exactly are beauty and the best and F8 not on this list? The summer movie season starts earlier then it used to.
Why exactly are beauty and the best and F8 not on this list? The summer movie season starts earlier then it used to.
No but like I should have known about China. The others I feel less dumb about, they don't matter as much for the film. But using Ghost in the Shell as a template (and it's probably the best one) Valerian really ought to pass King Arthur.Italy too. But you have to look online to know this stuff, so it's understandable to miss it.
Studios don't get everything from the gross, see kswis post for a pretty good estimate. A (rough) estimate for what a film needs to make in order to make back its budget is 2,5-3x its production budget (on the high end if the rest of world gross is high, on the lower end if its domestic gross is high).Why did Paramount get a C- if both of their movies had WW grosses above their production budgets? Is this due to the way WW grosses are divided up, or because marketing budgets on those movies were probably really high?
Just not seeing a justification for those grades with that data.