Very...strange thing in an AP story. (9/11 conspiracy theorists go mad)

Status
Not open for further replies.
The article is specifically talking about the 7th WTC building(nice job at butchering context), and probably means that nobody was killed in that specific building on 9/11, accurate or not.
 
I believe it's saying that no one was killed when that particular building collapsed. Whether that's true or not, I have no idea.
 
Hitokage said:
The article is specifically talking about the 7th WTC building, and probably means that nobody was killed in that specific building on 9/11, accurate or not.
Yeah, that's how I read it. Can't say I know specifically whether there were any deaths attributed to the collapse of the 7th building though.
 
Leon said:
I am now convinced.

9/11 did not happen.
even if you were increadibly gullible the only way you could derive that from the passage is if you did not read it properly. ;)
 
Okay, I'll admit, it got me the first time I read it over, but the second time it became apparent. It was sort of poorly-worded:

The new structure, expected to be completed next year, will replace the 47-story building that was hit by burning debris on Sept. 11, 2001, and collapsed hours after the twin towers. No one was killed there that day.

"There" could refer to either 7 WTC or the Twin Towers. The sentence appears to read upon the collapsing of the twin towers, no one was killed. To the casual glancer, in this instance Matlock, that's how it would seem. Upon further inspection, however, one finds out that everything after "47-story building" is a description of the new structure.

Don't mind the haters, dude. Happens to us all. :D
 
sarcasm.gif
 
Okay, new rule: if it's 3 AM or later, I avoid the "New Thread" button like the plague. Jeez, how did I make this thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom