• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

vg247-PS4: new kits shipping now, AMD A10 used as base, final version next summer

LastNac

Member
At default clocks single precision is 3.7 TFLOPS, double precission is 947 GFLOPS. Dont expect this to be in PS4, its a big standalone chip who eats 250W. PS4 will most likely use only APU with GPU section in line to 7850/7870 at max [1.8-2.4 TFLOPS].

No possible 3.0?
 
According to the leaked data, 8850 will have 2.99 TFLOPS with ~130W and 8870 will have 3.9TFLPPS with ~160W... But all this is not confirmed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...essing_units#Sea_Islands_.28HD_8xxx.29_series


If its true, then strip down GDDR5 ram, board chips, display adapters, and you get with very efficient and very powerful GPU chips. Hopefully 88xx series will end up in nextgen console APUs or dedicated GPUs.

This is what I think we're going to see in Orbis/Durango. AMD and Nvidia aren't designing their GPUs to be more power efficient just because... they see a demand for consoles needing powerful GPUs with TDPs under 200W.

At the minimum I expect a 8850 class GPU. More ideally... 8870. And I don't mind a bigger box to have better cooling to support such hardware.
 

quest

Not Banned from OT
This is what I think we're going to see in Orbis/Durango. AMD and Nvidia aren't gaming their GPUs more power efficient just because... they see a demand for consoles needing powerful GPUs with TDPs under 200W.

At the minimum I expect a 8850 class GPU. More ideally... 8870. And I don't mind a bigger box to have better cooling to support such hardware.

Expect to be very disappointed. Things have changed since the last set of console launches. If we get 1.8 FT GPUs feel very lucky because Sony and MS are not going to eat much money this time around. Also don't expect a 8000 series they have had specs locked in and been working on them for a while it is going to be modified 7000 series and more likely 7000m series. We will have to appreciate the smaller things these new consoles will bring like much much better texture filtering. I see nothing that would suggest we get a high end console this time around. That and the eye toy2 and kinect 2 will eat the GPU/CPU budget I think both come in every box. They have to compete with nintendo's gimmick in the box.
 
According to the leaked data, 8850 will have 2.99 TFLOPS with ~130W and 8870 will have 3.9TFLPPS with ~160W... But all this is not confirmed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...essing_units#Sea_Islands_.28HD_8xxx.29_series


If its true, then strip down GDDR5 ram, board chips, display adapters, and you get with very efficient and very powerful GPU chips. Hopefully 88xx series will end up in nextgen console APUs or dedicated GPUs.

I could imagine the 8850 in a high power PS4 scenario and hope dies last. I just don't think that anything like the 7970 with such a high thermal budget will be in the next Playstation.
 

THE:MILKMAN

Member
This is what I think we're going to see in Orbis/Durango. AMD and Nvidia aren't designing their GPUs to be more power efficient just because... they see a demand for consoles needing powerful GPUs with TDPs under 200W.

At the minimum I expect a 8850 class GPU. More ideally... 8870. And I don't mind a bigger box to have better cooling to support such hardware.

8850 is the max I'm expecting feature wise and closer to 7850 performance wise. The launch PS3 had a TDP around 170W (~210W at the wall) which included 2 big chips, PS2 chips, HDD, Bluray, RAM, WiFi/Bluetooth 4x USB big fan etc.

I just can't see a 130W GPU being used unless they go for a Wii U style 10 or 20W CPU.
 

Elios83

Member
This is what I think we're going to see in Orbis/Durango. AMD and Nvidia aren't designing their GPUs to be more power efficient just because... they see a demand for consoles needing powerful GPUs with TDPs under 200W.

At the minimum I expect a 8850 class GPU. More ideally... 8870. And I don't mind a bigger box to have better cooling to support such hardware.

It makes sense that the GPU will be the best AMD can provide at 28nm, for a TPD around 100-120W max and according to the silicon budget they have reserved for the GPU and the CPU.
It seems like Sony will focus on the GPU and GPGPU while Microsoft could use more silicon for more low power CPU cores so there's a higher chance that for Sony the GPU will be the key chip.
If AMD can deliver 3 Teraflops next year under these restrictions, then it's all great :D
 

Donnie

Member
I can see something like the HD7850 being the best we'll see next gen. 130w on 28nm process, 1.76Gflops. If you strip away the 2GB GDDR3 and replace it with 6GB DDR3, optimise a bit and remove a few features unneeded for consoles you could maybe bump it to 1.8+Gflops at 100w. Leaving room for a lowish power CPU, maybe 4-6 Jaguar cores, without needing to push the consoles power consumption to the kind of levels we saw with 360 and PS3. For XBox3 likely a less powerful GPU and more Jaguar cores instead.
 
Why? Wasn't it already rumoured the 720 will be out sooner and more powerful?

If this happens..... I think sony should pretty much give up in north america. A bit of a exaggeration but that would completely end any chances of them outselling next box in America. I think if they take Europe seriously(a.k.a actually care about countries outside of the UK) they could beat them as well. So that just leaves Japan right? I'm pretty sure ps3 will be poplar there for a long time to come. I also see wii u getting a lot of ps3 ports and those ports not coming to ps4. And since ps4 wont have BC it'll be another vita vs psp situation in japan. If sony cheapens out on hardware I think they'll end up in third again. I also think that the ps4 would overall sell a lot less than ps3 if that happened.
 
Anybody read/posted these rumours yet? (was lazy and didn't search for them so apologies if already posted)

http://tinyurl.com/bogtqtm

On the "PS4" Side it's almost completely different to what has currently been stated - hardware wise

I laughed.
If that's what they announce for ps4, I try to hang myself in a cold hotel room, crying about my pointless existence, right before Benjamin Linus busts in and does it for me - whilst wearing the omnitrixviewer.
 
Ver vague specs. But looks like they are now targeting 4GB of RAM.

That's what I would expect to see.

I think we'll see a noticeable jump rather than an enormous leap with these consoles. Diminishing returns are a factor, economics a much bigger one. It would be foolhardy to put out anything too beastly in the belief that you can easily swallow the loss.
 
That's what I would expect to see.

I think we'll see a noticeable jump rather than an enormous leap with these consoles. Diminishing returns are a factor, economics a much bigger one. It would be foolhardy to put out anything too beastly in the belief that you can easily swallow the loss.

I am not always so sure about that - selling 2-3 games more because being the lead/superior plattform might help out coping with initial losses a great deal. Of course that doesn't mean Sony should sell the PS4 for a 500$ loss but they should carefully weight all their options.

If the difference between 4GB or 2GB is "1 game" I would rather take the risk. On the other hand calculating that a user needs to buy 25 games to break even is stupid.
 

i-Lo

Member
Expect to be very disappointed. Things have changed since the last set of console launches. If we get 1.8 FT GPUs feel very lucky because Sony and MS are not going to eat much money this time around. Also don't expect a 8000 series they have had specs locked in and been working on them for a while it is going to be modified 7000 series and more likely 7000m series. We will have to appreciate the smaller things these new consoles will bring like much much better texture filtering. I see nothing that would suggest we get a high end console this time around. That and the eye toy2 and kinect 2 will eat the GPU/CPU budget I think both come in every box. They have to compete with nintendo's gimmick in the box.

Pretty much this. The capability may of PS4 may be best defined by its potential ability to play PS3 games in 1080p. Next gen is all about waggling your appendages and screaming verbal abuse at the screen and that indeed takes a lot of memory and power.

120W, 1.2TF (AMD 76XX) discrete GPU, 2GB DDR3 RAM, AMD A10 5700K, new and mind bogglingly innovative controller.... Yup we'll be lucky to see PS4 get even close to this.
 

Razgreez

Member
120W, 1.2TF (AMD 76XX) discrete GPU, 2GB DDR3 RAM, AMD A10 5700K, new and mind bogglingly innovative controller.... Yup we'll be lucky to see PS4 get even close to this.

Present those specs to Shuhei Yoshida and i'm pretty sure he'd have a laugh
 
Pretty much this. The capability may of PS4 may be best defined by its potential ability to play PS3 games in 1080p. Next gen is all about waggling your appendages and screaming verbal abuse at the screen and that indeed takes a lot of memory and power.

120W, 1.2TF (AMD 76XX) discrete GPU, 2GB DDR3 RAM, AMD A10 5700K, new and mind bogglingly innovative controller.... Yup we'll be lucky to see PS4 get even close to this.

Are you really so sure about that? Maybe MS will go that route but Sony did not show much interest in new controllers, motion sensors, etc. They want to sell games, consoles, TVs and mobile phones. Where are the AAA titles with Kinect, Move, ... support? Not even Nintendo unleashes the "full" potential of their tablet console combo - Sony going that route would be a big failure.
 

kikonawa

Member
If this happens..... I think sony should pretty much give up in north america. A bit of a exaggeration but that would completely end any chances of them outselling next box in America. I think if they take Europe seriously(a.k.a actually care about countries outside of the UK) they could beat them as well. So that just leaves Japan right? I'm pretty sure ps3 will be poplar there for a long time to come. I also see wii u getting a lot of ps3 ports and those ports not coming to ps4. And since ps4 wont have BC it'll be another vita vs psp situation in japan. If sony cheapens out on hardware I think they'll end up in third again. I also think that the ps4 would overall sell a lot less than ps3 if that happened.
Lol. Xbox fanboy a bit?
 
Are you really so sure about that? Maybe MS will go that route but Sony did not show much interest in new controllers, motion sensors, etc. They want to sell games, consoles, TVs and mobile phones. Where are the AAA titles with Kinect, Move, ... support? Not even Nintendo unleashes the "full" potential of their tablet console combo - Sony going that route would be a big failure.

No power greater than X, MS dying to use this slogan again.
 

Pranay

Member
Pretty much this. The capability may of PS4 may be best defined by its potential ability to play PS3 games in 1080p. Next gen is all about waggling your appendages and screaming verbal abuse at the screen and that indeed takes a lot of memory and power.

120W, 1.2TF (AMD 76XX) discrete GPU, 2GB DDR3 RAM, AMD A10 5700K, new and mind bogglingly innovative controller.... Yup we'll be lucky to see PS4 get even close to this.

:lol

"let him dream"
 
I already suggested that but there was no response. I thought GAF has a rather strict policy when it comes to rumours and claims of that sort.

It's the reason I pretty much avoid threads like this. It's a bunch of guys who've read a couple digital foundry articles and now want to come across as some sort of authority on the subject.
 

Elios83

Member
Pretty much this. The capability may of PS4 may be best defined by its potential ability to play PS3 games in 1080p. Next gen is all about waggling your appendages and screaming verbal abuse at the screen and that indeed takes a lot of memory and power.

120W, 1.2TF (AMD 76XX) discrete GPU, 2GB DDR3 RAM, AMD A10 5700K, new and mind bogglingly innovative controller.... Yup we'll be lucky to see PS4 get even close to this.

LOL in that case they could just go on with the PS3, it would be a pointless update since it would be obsolete in a couple of years. Also 'waggling' is dead even for Nintendo.
Sony doesn't make shitty hardware, it's really the only thing that no one can argue about them, PS4 will be designed using the same philosophy behind the Vita, they're targeting 10X the power of PS3 but they will use off the schelves components so that R&D expenses will be limited, they won't lose money and they won't be forced to price it at 500-600$.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
The 120 and 240hz settings aren't allowing your games to run at a higher frame rate natively. What happens on higher end TV's (like yours) is, it takes a 30 or 60 fps source, in this case your game, and then interpolates and creates new images in between the native frames, to make it appear more smoothly.

Lets say you have a video feed of a ball rolling across the screen. Here are two frames:
[_O_____]
[_____O_]

What the 120 and 240 settings do, is create more frames in between by analyzing the before and after images... so you get:
[_O_____]
[___O___]
[_____O_]

or even better:
[_O_____]
[__O____]
[___O___]
[____O__]
[_____O_]

The more frames you have, the smoother it looks. The problem with this is that, because the TV (NOT THE CONSOLE) creates the new images, those new images often have flaws. Especially with the extremely "jaggy" and low image quality console games we have today. The created frames will look worse.

Unless the next gen brings more 60fps games, you won't see a frame rate increase. 120fps is used in maybe a couple games, and one of those is Super Stardust HD on PS3, and that's only because of 3D.


I think SSDHD is still only 60fps in 3D, just that each frame is twice as tall (frame packed) and the TV takes them and splits them out to each eye.
 

quest

Not Banned from OT
LOL in that case they could just go on with the PS3, it would be a pointless update since it would be obsolete in a couple of years. Also 'waggling' is dead even for Nintendo.
Sony doesn't make shitty hardware, it's really the only thing that no one can argue about them, PS4 will be designed using the same philosophy behind the Vita, they're targeting 10X the power of PS3 but they will use off the schelves components so that R&D expenses will be limited, they won't lose money and they won't be forced to price it at 500-600$.

You know the last console to use off the shelf parts? The dreamcast maybe that will get peoples expectations in line. People forget that a high end computer GPUs are going to be doing a lot more work. A console game is going to be at max 1080p. On the PC people have some insane tripple monitor set ups or 1440p monitors. I don't see why a GPU based on a high end 7000m can't deliver some amazing things. Just the amount of memory especially for textures and texture filtering will be amazing upgrades. Also these consoles won't have monster bandwidth. I be pointless to put a 3.5 TF GPU if you don't got the bandwidth to back it up. You can talk EDram but that takes away from the other part of the GPU budget. It is a balancing act. When the jaguar became the CPU of most rumors you should know that it won't compete with high end computers. While the jaguar will be amazing for its die size and TDP it still going to have the IPC close to athlon 64 and low clocks.
 
Nope. I don't.

Even if you're just thinking logically the consoles haven't been announced. We can all give reasons why we think the consoles will or won't be powerful, but nothing is set in stone until Sony/MS are up on stage giving us the rundown. Thats how i see it anyway.

Unless you truly do know something. :eek:>
 
I think SSDHD is still only 60fps in 3D, just that each frame is twice as tall (frame packed) and the TV takes them and splits them out to each eye.

Yeah, each framebuffer is "full frame" 1280x1470. Two 1280x720 images stacked on top one another with a 30pixel black space in between. TV outputs each eye at 60fps, but it would still be 120fps overall.
 

Lord Error

Insane For Sony
That dualpixels article reads like complete and utter fanboy dream. The chances of Sony being able to manufacture dual (or a single large) OLED screens for that visor and sell it for cheap enough are practically nill. I'd love if they do it though, would make for a very interesting console, very Wii-like approach where they give you something that you can't have with other machines and you just have to try it.

Idea with the livewall for MS just makes zero sense to me and is a biggest giveaway that this is some made up BS. You'd practically have to have a dedicated room with almost nothing in it for it to work. No windows, furniture, plants, nothing, just white walls everywhere.
 

pottuvoi

Banned
Yeah, each framebuffer is "full frame" 1280x1470. Two 1280x720 images stacked on top one another with a 30pixel black space in between. TV outputs each eye at 60fps, but it would still be 120fps overall.
In terms of gameplay, physics and such it's 60fps with two viewpoints. (you can also use same shadow buffers etc.)
 

Sorc3r3r

Member
We know if Sony is going to bundle a pseye 2.0 in every box?

There some hint on whaterever kind of gimmick we must be prepared to see by Sony?

In the end i just want a pad.
Am I ancient or out of their marketshare thinking so?
 

Globox_82

Banned
Anybody read/posted these rumours yet? (was lazy and didn't search for them so apologies if already posted)

http://tinyurl.com/bogtqtm

On the "PS4" Side it's almost completely different to what has currently been stated - hardware wise

– Known first party games in development for Playstation Omni are: Next Gen Uncharted, Next Gen Siren, The Boydguard, Wipeout Omni, Bump In the Night, Killzone 4, Gran Turismo Prologue, Next Gen Media Molecule, Omni Fitness.

Buahahahah I had a good laugh reading this nonsense. Next gen Siren lol, the bodyguard - hello there Gamesblow, Bump in the night - is this some hentai game? haha. Next gen MM - what does that even mean lol.
 
We know if Sony is going to bundle a pseye 2.0 in every box?

There some hint on whaterever kind of gimmick we must be prepared to see by Sony?

In the end i just want a pad.
Am I ancient or out of their marketshare thinking so?

I say you are as normal as me. I don't want cameras, microphones, move/touch controls, etc. - a Dualshock controller and a immersive Dark Souls 2 is all I need.
 
Top Bottom