VGLeaks: First look as Durango XDK (always connected, kinect required, must install)

It's not, but then on the 360 you have to wait up to 12 minutes while a game installs, which is really the only negative of it. With Durango, you can start playing before the install has finished, so why wouldn't you do it, even if it was optional?

Did the forced installs on the PS3 stop people from buying that system? Did everybody boycott the games that had forced installs on that system? Nope. It's a non-issue.

The only concerns are whether an online connection is actually required to use the system/play games, and whether used games are blocked, but the article says nothing about either of those things..

This. From the information we have, mandatory installs and always on (not online) aren't inherently bad things. Will wait for more information before I form an opinion.
 
But it doesn't say that a connection is required. It just says that the console is always connected so that it can download updates even when it's turned off. People are assuming far too much here.

Always online is what Edge reported though and they look to be right again.

I don't know why it's even necessary for them to do that but we'll see at the unveiling.
 
Keep the faith.

Not "keeping the faith".

Just not going to go down the same road I did back in 2005 when I followed a ton of rumors about the current gen consoles and ended up eating crow (lol). Have just chosen the "wait and see" approach this time around.

Not really, no smoke without fire. Kinect always connected is almost certainly true. If you are going to bundle it why allow it to be packed into the cupboard (where it belongs).

I think putting kinect into every system is simply a tactic for better support of the device from devs who are interested in it.

Pretty sure that there are devs that are interested in kinect but don't support (yet) it because it's currently a $100+ separate add-on.

Overall console sales > optional add-on sales.
 
Isn't that what always connected is? No connection, no play?

That's the thing, it could just mean that it continues to automatically update and such when powered off/sleep mode or whatever. From what i read in OP, it doesn't seem to imply internet connection is required to play games.
 
My laptop is always on and always connected and also requires games to be installed. I'm not really seeing how this would effect me negatively. The required Kinect thing is kind of weak, but again, my 360 has my Kinect constantly hooked up too and it doesn't really bother me all that much, other than the lack of games that use it.
 
welp

PS4 will be enough if this thing is actually always online. At least until Canada catches up to the rest of the world regarding Internet speeds/bandwidth caps.
 
I like the forced installations. If developers take advantage of that, we could see some faster loading times. Sure we won't be getting SSDs, but it'll be better than optical media, right?

I wonder if we're going to start seeing games with serial numbers attached to them and the disc is purely for quick installing, rather than downloading from a server.
 
I read some where that the majority of the Kinect uses will be voice stuff.

That's probably the main reason behind the "kinect required" part : several os level features are probably voice-controlled, and that's why you need the sensor available.
 
Sounds pretty ambitious for Microsoft. They are doing something completely different from the norm. Just the meltdowns in this thread is indicative of that. Will be interesting to see if they are successful.
 
Isn't that what always connected is? No connection, no play?

The point they're making in that paragraph is that it stays connected when the console is turned off. They don't mention whether it is mandatory to be connected in the first place. I really wouldn't be surprised though. They said in 2005 they wanted 50% online this generation and got it; I can see 100% next gen

Bet you can only play if Kinect detects a player.

I'm worried about this too, because the Kinect is shit at recognizing me
 
People do understand that footage/images of you don't actually go anywhere? Do you think its sending footage of you to some guy sitting in a room filled with monitors?
I bet the same people never buy laptops with webcams built because omg what if ms doesn't care about the law and decides to record you anyways?!?!
 
Isn't that what always connected is? No connection, no play?

Hrmm...I don't see it that way.

For instance, my broadband is always connected but not always used. My PC does downloads and updates in the background without even thinking, hell auto-install the things if you must! :D If my net drops my PC still works, except a few things that require internet to function.

I can see why people are worried but at this point we just have two sides reading the same text in different ways. MS won't be jumping in to clear this up till they announce the console.
 
You have to realise that there is 16 times the RAM in these systems and only 3 times the disc speed compared to last gen. A disc.only load would take ages anyway if it was filling the memory with disc assets.

Unless it's streaming FMV or codec-style audio. Which are goddamn huge but well within the capacity of a 2x BD drive, never mind 6x.

It also ain't all that hot if you need one 1MB shirt texture/model out of the 500 that exist, and you don't know which until the character pops on screen. Or will a GTA or Saints Row lock you in your apartment until every single piece of clothing and model of car are copied over? Will there be minute-long load screens if you fire up TESVI after cleaning out the fridge and immediately fast travel to another city? The best-case scenario for play-during-install for games like these is... streaming it except copying BD-RAM-HDD-RAM rather than just BD-RAM.

The full install option is a great option for a lot of games, but it shouldn't be mandatory because it doesn't even fit all of the popular usage scenarios, never mind every usage scenario. (Then again, the same can be said about always-online or Kinect!)

It also completely rules out an early cheap SKU with 16GB-32GB, or probably 64GB, of Flash.
 
That might be because you really know jack squat about it at the moment and have no clue about the games or services its going to offer.

If you've been an xbox fan for the last ten years, I'd wager you'll be interested in what they show.

I'm not talking about you here, but the assumptions and overreactions in this thread aren't even funny. Its just broad, uninformed righteous indignation and 'real gamer' histrionics.

I'm reading stuff like this:

You and I have very different ideas of dystopia!

How the fuck is kinect being included and required any different from having your Wii U sensor bar plugged in, or the PS4 and its included camera bar, which is required for tracking the new dual shock?

As for the always connected stuff - take a look at Windows Phone 7 and Windows 8 and you can imagine how that might be useful. I don't know how we've convinced ourselves that the best online service provider out of the three is suddenly only interested in online because they want to take ma physical games and stop me from reselling them! This talk reeks of unsubstantiated fear and FUD

Bring on the reveal!

Great post.
 
God I hope MS has something big planned because I'm not sure how the market will respond to some of this stuff.

Could go either way.

My consoles are always connected anyway.

But always on and "no used games" aren't one and the same. I like that it will update everything in the background so my experience isn't interrupted.

From a personal perspective? That all sounds awesome.

From a market perspective? Not so sure.

A few weeks ago we had a thread about what potential next gen clusterfuck people cared about (hated) more, no used games or always on. I didn't count it up, but it seemed at least 5-1 in favor of always on. Despite how vocal some people are, no used games doesn't seem to be nearly as big an issue. Always on is, regardless of the status of used games, assuming that Microsoft's version of always on is the same as every other form of it we've ever seen, aka can't play without connection.
 
I really want the next-gen Xbox instead of the PS4 since I'm so heavily invested in the Xbox system. I also really hate the PS3, it's online and controller. But each rumour coming from the MS side sounds terrible. Going of rumours alone, I think I need to switch to the PS4 :(
 
Hmm, nothing we don't already know, and still no indication of how DRM works. Always online is still a major scare and I pray to god MS is watching always online being straight required blow up in people's faces right now.

That Durango overview reads kinda.. Weird though.

LEAK MORE PAGES GODDAMNIT

Surely there's a page detailing the DRM if every game has to be aware of it and provide appropriate stops/freezes/errors, right?

If I had the XDK program, I would open up every file and scan through everything. The source that sent the author those pics might be deliberate with how much is shown, and that doesn't make sense.
 
Is there actually some other reason that may cause the always on except DRM (copyprotection + anti used games)? I can't think of any other reason.

To download updates and patches for games while the console is off?
I think the "always-on" thing is just so it can do stuff like that but I'm sure you can still play games without an internet connection. MS are not that stupid surely.
 
But it doesn't say that a connection is required. It just says that the console is always connected so that it can download updates even when it's turned off. People are assuming far too much here.

How will your games be authenticated? It says discs are only used for distribution. It could be implied that they'll also be used to authenticate, but the wording makes it sound like you won't need them to be in the drive. Which means either online authentication or kinect authentication, which might make some sense out of the requirement for kinect to be plugged in for the console to work.
 
Every Durango console will have a hard drive, although its exact capacity has not been choosen. It will be large enough, however, to hold a large number of games.

lol, that's a spotty sentence for an official doc.
 
I really want the next-gen Xbox instead of the PS4 since I'm so heavily invested in the Xbox system. I also really hate the PS3, it's online and controller. But each rumour coming from the MS side sounds terrible. Going of rumours alone, I think I need to switch to the PS4 :(

What's wrong with the PSN?
 
That might be because you really know jack squat about it at the moment and have no clue about the games or services its going to offer.

If you've been an xbox fan for the last ten years, I'd wager you'll be interested in what they show.

I'm not talking about you here, but the assumptions and overreactions in this thread aren't even funny. Its just broad, uninformed righteous indignation and 'real gamer' histrionics.

I'm reading stuff like this:

You and I have very different ideas of dystopia!

How the fuck is kinect being included and required any different from having your Wii U sensor bar plugged in, or the PS4 and its included camera bar, which is required for tracking the new dual shock?

As for the always connected stuff - take a look at Windows Phone 7 and Windows 8 and you can imagine how that might be useful. I don't know how we've convinced ourselves that the best online service provider out of the three is suddenly only interested in online because they want to take ma physical games and stop me from reselling them! This talk reeks of unsubstantiated fear and FUD

Bring on the reveal!

/thread
 
I wonder if the must install on HDD is a way to avoid Bluray royalties. It can't be right?


Forcing to install doesn't really make sense, specially considering how much faster bluray drives are now.
 
How will your games be authenticated? It says discs are only used for distribution. It could be implied that they'll also be used to authenticate, but the wording makes it sound like you won't need them to be in the drive. Which means either online authentication or kinect authentication, which might make some sense out of the requirement for kinect to be plugged in for the console to work.

Or authentication is taken from the disc and stored on the console/gamertag. Take game to friends house, install and load your gamertag up...game works!
 
People do understand that footage/images of you don't actually go anywhere? Do you think its sending footage of you to some guy sitting in a room filled with monitors?

it's the possibility that is my point....

how long do you think it will take the fbi to try to get a loop hole/back door through Microsoft?

Have read enough case law in my criminal classes to be weary of putting a camera in my living room, not that I do anything illegal lol. Simply want to ensure my privacy.
 
But always on and "no used games" aren't one and the same. I like that it will update everything in the background so my experience isn't interrupted.
Great point. That'd be really nice, assuming it's true.

Good grief... with the size of the next gen games, and having to install them all to play them, this thing has to come with one humongous HD.
And again, I don't want to pay for a giant hard drive. 250GB is plenty of space for my gaming habits. Anything significantly larger than that would be total overkill for me. I just hate paying for stuff that I won't use. (Edit : Well, I guess game sizes are going to be a lot bigger, too, so that would be the jumbo hard drive to good use.)
 
good for you, not all of us though want to pay for a shitty product we have no interest in nor are we keen on having an always on device with a camera connected to it always looking at our living room.

Are you saying you have never bought a device that didn't have a feature or component you didn't use that increased the price of the product, I would find that hard to believe.

As for the camera do you genuinely think MS is going to use it to spy on you or leaving it open so that others can.....interesting!!!
 
Game install being required isn't all that bad. I almost always install my discs when I first pop them in.

The only issue I have with the idea (which I think is a good one in general) is HDD space. If the Durango uses dual layer BD disc at 50GB capacity, that's only 10 games that can fit on a 500GB drive, or 20 on a 1TB drive. And I think it unlikely there will be a 1TB SKU, so 500GB or smaller is far more likely.

Requiring games to be installed will be an arsehole move if the next Xbox still has the requirement that the actual BD disc in in the console to start it up. I will love the day when I can have a console with its entire library available to me, without having to swap disc around.
 
Not "keeping the faith".

Just not going to go down the same road I did back in 2005 when I followed a ton of rumors about the current gen consoles and ended up eating crow (lol). Have just chosen the "wait and see" approach this time around.



I think putting kinect into every system is simply a tactic for better support of the device from devs who are interested in it.

Pretty sure that there are devs that are interested in kinect but don't support (yet) it because it's currently a $100+ separate add-on.

Overall console sales > optional add-on sales.

Kinect has too much effort behind it for it not to be the center piece of their plans. The only thing that I feel certain about is that is will be required / integrated device not a peripheral but rather an integral part of the system. Whether a game supports it or not. You'll need Kinect kinected to boot and use the system. Why would that be otherwise?
 
I am not digging the Kinect information, hoping for the best. I have a pretty sweet set up now in my living room, I don't want some camera pointing at me, my family or guests all the time.... This may be a deal breaker for me...:/

th


I do like the low latency controller though.
 
As for the always connected stuff - take a look at Windows Phone 7 and Windows 8 and you can imagine how that might be useful.
I imagined how it would be useful in Windows 8, so I made an online user account first. It literally annoyed me 14 times in the first 2 hours of using the system (before I switched to an offline account in disgust).
 
I wonder if the must install on HDD is a way to avoid Bluray royalties. It can't be right?


Forcing to install doesn't really make sense, specially considering how much faster bluray drives are now.

Unless they are pushing SSD. Would make sense if they wanted damn fast accessing. Though that pushes the price way up.
 
Then you delete a game.

I know, I don't know why some people don't understand this concept.
I mean seriously how many games do you need to have installed at any one given time? I mean shit at most I am playing 3-4 games max at any one time. You finish with it, hit delete from hard drive. Not a hard concept.

The mandatory installs is actually a very good thing. Better performance is just one benefit. The only good thing about any of these leaks about Durango.

The only issue I have with the idea (which I think is a good one in general) is HDD space. If the Durango uses dual layer BD disc at 50GB capacity, that's only 10 games that can fit on a 500GB drive, or 20 on a 1TB drive. And I think it unlikely there will be a 1TB SKU, so 500GB or smaller is far more likely.

Come on son, you really can't think every game is going to be 50GB?
 
Top Bottom