Borrowed intelligence is also called "civilization". As individuals only a small fraction of our knowledge is actually novel.
Joe Rogan had a bit many years ago that said "You take the smartest guy on the planet and put him on a desert island with a hatchet how long until he can send me an email?"
What makes us smart as a species is the way we have built collaboration tools to share information, and you can trace a direct line between how advanced a society is and how able it is to share information across a large amount of people.
Problem is we largely sift through this information using consensus but now with the internet and social media we can find any consensus you want. We work it backwards. You think the earth is flat, you just find people to tell you that. You want to prove your point you just google someone who has done it for you.
The current information paradigm has kind of broken the way our brains actually process that information, so you get a lot of people being real fucking dumb.
No, I'm talking about borrowed intelligence, not the building blocks of civilization. Are you able to hold a conversation, or is this the typical NPC yanking it back to the narrow range their script covers instead of... you know... forming their own opinion? Seems like
godhandiscen
had you pegged.
When your intelligence is comprised of disconnected statements, quips, quotes, and articles about some study from some scientists, you aren't actually smart. You're just taking something you saw and throwing it at someone who knows a bit less than you. But in actual conversation, it becomes obvious who is just borrowing talking points and who has their own opinion. Finding the latter is a gem and should be treasured, even if the other person doesn't happen to share all the same viewpoints as you, which isn't the goal anyway. The internet is a perfect tool for sorting out borrowed intelligence and real intelligence, because there are no equalizers or bigotries. Black, white, old, young, male, female, none of that matters on the internet as long as you can form a compelling argument.
I'm here to have a conversation with people who've put in the time to learn, who are humble enough to accept suggestions aimed at their paradigm, and who continually present a better, more complete version of their beliefs as time goes on. I seek out those kind of people and I appreciate when they return the sentiment to me.
That is civilization. Parroting talking points from journos is not intelligence and especially not "civilization"