Video shows FSU QB throwing a punch at a woman at a bar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not even close. Two things are apparent here: that he didn't hit her with his full strength, and he didn't continue the attack beyond that one punch.

You, on the other hand, have to magically prove that a softer punch (exactly how much softer we're talking here, who knows but you) would have stopped her from attacking him.

Good luck with that.

I don't have to "magically" prove anything, you simply need to abandon this absurd notion that punching someone who punched you necessarily meets every legal requirement for responding proportionally.
 
Not even close. Two things are apparent here: that he didn't hit her with his full strength, and he didn't continue the attack beyond that one punch.

You, on the other hand, have to magically prove that a softer punch (exactly how much softer we're talking here, who knows but you) would have stopped her from attacking him.

Good luck with that.
This.

Apparently we can also proportion the level of force required when someone hits us in the face in any situation and respond in kind.

Lol this is getting ridiculous.
 
I'm not dismissing her attack. I'm telling you that her attack did not justify his response, and obviously so. It's not even close to be honest with you.



Reductio ad absurdum much? The response must be reasonable, not precisely equal. His level of violence was not proportional to hers by orders of magnitude. We don't need our micrometers for this one.

So what is a reasonable response to receiving an ineffective blow in a street fight? A glove slap? He jabbed her. He's a borderline professional athlete, if he wanted to he could have taken her head clean off.
 
And I'd be feeling really good about another very ignorant, very violent person being served

Isn't she a violent person? Don't get me wrong, what the poster you're responding to said is fucked up, but this response coupled with you wondering why the woman should be charged aren't matching up.
 
But she's not a piece of shit for assaulting him.....

ridiculous double standard lol

It's okay to assault strangers but not okay to defend yourself against a weaker person?

No, she's shit too. But getting punched by a drunk girl isn't a justification for a college football player to retaliate. The appropriate thing to have done was back off and let the bouncers deal with it. One shitty act doesn't justify another.
 
I don't have to "magically" prove anything, you simply need to abandon this absurd notion that punching someone who punched you necessarily meets every legal requirement for responding proportionally.

When did I argue that? I'm talking about this specific punch, in this specific scenario.
 
Alcohol doesn't remove culpability, but you seem to think it does. If I as a man drunkenly punch a woman, I can't put that shit on the alcohol. It was my decision to drink. Besides, drunk or not (she didn't look drunk to me), don't raise your arm and start mouthing off at someone just because they're trying to squeeze in to a spot at the bar. It's not like he was harassing her or trying to feel her up. He was trying to get to the counter just like she was. And if he wasn't already pissed by her talking shit and pulling back her fist, the n-word probably would've set him off. Of course, anyone that uses that word deserves a punch to the face anyway.

You're right, the alcohol part is inconsequential to whether this would be justified or not. I still don't think that her having her hand raised like that, hovering in place, warrants an immediate restraint of her fist and him pushing her off to the guy. I would be a bit more forgiving if she had no justification for being peeved, but that guy seemed to really force himself into that space. I keep rewatching the video and he really forces himself to the point of forcing the other girl standing to the left out awkwardly.

I see the video and I see the guy awkwardly forcing himself in, peeving the girl to raise her fist, pushing the QB to restrain her, which prompted the punch. I just don't see that raising of the fist as grounds enough to restrain her like he did. This isn't even getting to the level of force applied by the QB punch.
 
So what is a reasonable response to receiving an ineffective blow in a street fight? A glove slap? He jabbed her. He's a borderline professional athlete, if he wanted to he could have taken her head clean off.

I don't think people realize how strong Div 1 athletes are.
 
So what is a reasonable response to receiving an ineffective blow in a street fight? A glove slap? He jabbed her. He's a borderline professional athlete, if he wanted to he could have taken her head clean off.

There are quite literally an infinite number of morally and legally acceptable responses available to him, but hitting her with his fist in the face was not one of them.
 
It seems she raised her first, he immediately grabs her arm and forcibly pushes her back and continues to restrain her, she punched him after he had done that. Then he decides it's okay to try and knock her out.



And I'd be feeling really good about another very ignorant, very violent person being served.

So I'm the "very ignorant and violent" person but not the woman who assaulted me?

Ridiculous double standard but whatever, don't care about your opinion.
 
I don't have to "magically" prove anything, you simply need to abandon this absurd notion that punching someone who punched you necessarily meets every legal requirement for responding proportionally.
You're going to type this in good faith and accuse others of logical fallacies?

I'd say that punch was proportional to her punch and kneeing of his groin.
 
Your entire argument falls flat with the bolded.

Yours is an entirely different situation, especially since you knew he had mental issues. In this case, the woman, a complete stranger, called him names, punched, and kicked him in the groin.

I don't advocate hitting women, but if I was in his place? Chances are, I probably would've done the same. A single punch stopped the conflict. Dude did the right thing.

The point of my post was to illustrate that even in confrontations at a bar where a person tries to physically assault you with moderate force, there are measures that can be taken to solve the situation without resorting to an all-out brawl. The scenario in the video is a much milder case where the use of force to the extent of what the man did is uncalled for and entirely disproportionate. I would have been justified in using equal force in my case, yes—but my foreknowledge deterred me from doing so especially knowing that a bouncer could better handle the situation. I reacted in a manner I felt would be proportionate given his mental health issues.

With the woman at the bar (besides not brushing/pushing against her or putting my hands on her), I would have simply told the bouncer or moved to another spot. If she threw that weak knee/punch at me, I would have told a bouncer and if I couldn't, I would have restrained her AFTER she did these things, not before. I could have told her to move, fuck off, whatever; but I wouldn't have thrown a strong punch to her face.
 
Charge them both honestly. You can't just go around throwing punches at people in bars. This could have honestly been way worse. Dude shouldn't have hit her at all but you need to learn some fucking restraint. If you don't charge her you basically endorse that her behavior is okay and it might happen again. It doesn't excuse what he did at all but she should be held accountable as well.

Also it's really clear from the video that she barely gets anything behind that punch and he almost knocks her out of the chair. It's pretty obvious his response was overkill. Can I quantify that? Well not really. But he barely even flinched when she hit him. He leaned his head back slightly to avoid it and then almost knocked her out of the chair. It's as clear as day honestly.
 
No, she's shit too. But getting punched by a drunk girl isn't a justification for a college football player to retaliate. The appropriate thing to have done was back off and let the bouncers deal with it. One shitty act doesn't justify another.
You don't even attempt to take in account natural instinct, which is to retaliate especially depending on someone's background and whatnot.
 
There are quite literally an infinite number of morally and legally acceptable responses available to him, but hitting her with his fist in the face was not one of them.

Yeah, and you can just tell he really thought really long and hard on how to respond before hitting her. I mean, one whole half-second passed before he punched her! It was clearly premeditated savagery.
 
I think this would be relevant:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_retreat

Florida's stand your ground laws might be the only thing that can help him. Given that he can be seen as an aggressor as well though, particularly when he grabs her prior to any punches actually being thrown, I think he is screwed.

Quoting myself:
Florida state law states
776.012 Use or threatened use of force in defense of person.—
(1) A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.

Read the bold.

He bumped into her at a crowded bar. She confronted him with a raised fist and mouths off. Any person would reasonably believe they would have to defend themselves in such an instant. He restrains her unsuccessfully. She strikes him. He strikes back.

He didn't have a duty to retreat.
 
That video is so bad. I get that she's trying to throw a punch, but she's drunk and she's a girl who obviously doesn't know the first thing about being physical. Essentially what happens is she presses her hand against his face, I've "punched" myself harder adjusting my glasses. Ridiculous reaction.


And what would they be ? Can't wait to hear this

How about walking away?
 
And what would they be ? Can't wait to hear this

He could move, he could attempt to continue restraining her as he was or restrain her some other way, he could push her in any number of different way, etc.

You're going to type this in good faith and accuse others of logical fallacies?

Yes? Are you going to explain why I can't?

I'd say that punch was proportional to her punch and kneeing of his groin.

And I would say you're obviously wrong.

...because?

Because hitting her in the face is not a reasonable or proportional response.

Yeah, and you can just tell he really thought really long and hard on how to respond before hitting her. I mean, one whole half-second passed before he punched her! It was clearly premeditated savagery.

First an irrelevant point and then a strawman.
 
That video is so bad. I get that she's trying to throw a punch, but she's drunk and she's a girl who obviously doesn't know the first thing about being physical. Essentially what happens is she presses her hand against his face, I've "punched" myself harder adjusting my glasses. Ridiculous reaction.

Actually, considering how quickly and recklessly she resorted to violence, I would assume that she's quite familiar with getting physical.

Because hitting her in the face is not a reasonable or proportional response.

...because? Your continued refusal to answer this question won't make it go away.
 
He pretty clearly grabbed her before she threw that punch. He definitely started that, you don't just grab people like that. Him throwing and landing that punch basically seals the deal of it being full blown assault. No sympathy for him there.
 
Hahaha, daaamn, that was a straight punch to the face. So she tried to pUnch him but he blocks and then clocks her in the face, right? Yep. No sympathy for her.
 
So what is a reasonable response to receiving an ineffective blow in a street fight? A glove slap? He jabbed her. He's a borderline professional athlete, if he wanted to he could have taken her head clean off.

tumblr_lgfnvhOMcq1qgh81zo1_500.png
 
First an irrelevant point and then a strawman.

You're the one that keeps moving goal posts. The guy responded in the moment to an immediate threat. Should he have just walked away? Yes. No one is advocating he should have hit the woman. That doesn't mean he wasn't justified in doing so. He was, and the law is on his side.
 
Isn't she a violent person? Don't get me wrong, what the poster you're responding to said is fucked up, but this response coupled with you wondering why the woman should be charged aren't matching up.

Looking at the events he is the one that instigated the physical part of the confrontation.
 
That video is so bad. I get that she's trying to throw a punch, but she's drunk and she's a girl who obviously doesn't know the first thing about being physical. Essentially what happens is she presses her hand against his face, I've "punched" myself harder adjusting my glasses. Ridiculous reaction.
How is this not sexist against females? You are basically calling her a delicate flower.
 
Actually, considering how quickly and recklessly she resorted to violence, I would assume that she's quite familiar with getting physical.

And you would be wrong to assume that. Look at that "punch". She's gonna do about as much damage as a 5 year old with those.
 
No it isn't. Provocation doesn't excuse assault.

Not provocation. Assault. She assaulted him. This is very clear in the video.

And you would be wrong to assume that. Look at that "punch". She's gonna do about as much damage as a 5 year old with those.

I don't think so. I've never known a person who was truly unfamiliar with physical violence to start immediately punching and kicking groins.

Look at her body language. She's ready to get physical the second he bumped into her.

We'll have to agree to disagree.
 
Pretty infuriating to see people talk down on others as if they're superior over cultural differences.

In my culture from a very young age you are taught to fight back if assaulted no matter the circumstances. Parents and peers both preached this. In my culture it's okay to physically discipline your child. These things are okay where I was raised, so why does someone raised in a nice neighborhood with parents who were at work all the time so never disciplines them gets the right to talk down on people who were raised and taught differently. It's such a superiority complex in these people's minds that it angers me.

I could show all my friends and strangers the GIFS in OP and they would all commend the guy for striking her. But people from a different angle of life will call him a thug, violent, and uncivilized and talk down as if they don't have cultural faults.
 
How, as a lawyer, do you argue that a punch to the face is a disproportionate response to a punch to the face? Did he wind up and throw a haymaker? Did he double axe handle her in the back of the head? Did he pummel her mercilessly on the ground? Did he put on brass knuckles? Whip out a club or knife? Pull a gun? He responded with proportionate force to an assault on his person and stopped his attacker... after she wrestled herself free of his previous non-violent attempts to stop her assaulting him.

The only way you could argue that he was not justified is if you argued that a grown woman is physically incapable of harming a man with her fists.

Preach!

Chick needed a to get checked.
Im hoping this guys lawyer is good enough to get him off and get the chick tried.
She started she threw a punch at him, he threw one back.

Do hit people if you are ready to get hit.
 
Equal rights, equal fights.. more or less i hope that these kinds of woman get the "i am untouchable and can do whatever i want to a man" thinking out of the system but yeah not holding my breath.
 
Not provocation. Assault. She assaulted him. This is very clear in the video.

Assault also does not excuse assault, except in the case of self defense which requires a reasonable and proportional response.

The law is very clearly not on his side.
 
Yeah, and you can just tell he really thought really long and hard on how to respond before hitting her. I mean, one whole half-second passed before he punched her! It was clearly premeditated savagery.
Exactly. The heat of the moment.

I've been suckered by someone at a club once and felt furious. Punched the guy back and it was broken up. But that feeling is almost uncontrollable when it happens to you under varying circumstances. I really wish people could take a punch and walk away but it doesn't happen every time.

I'm not saying it's correct or "proportional", but you can't expect someone to act accordingly in these situations. Clearly, this can lead to potentially horrible outcomes for everyone involved but don't expect the rational response and blame one party for not doing the "right thing".
 
No it isn't. Provocation doesn't excuse assault.

But it is.

Florida state law defines self defense pertinent to this context as the use of force under a reasonable belief that it is necessary to defend against an imminent threat.

She raised her fist. How is that not an imminent threat?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom