Video shows FSU QB throwing a punch at a woman at a bar

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't even attempt to take in account natural instinct, which is to retaliate especially depending on someone's background and whatnot.

So let me get this straight: you're saying that if someone comes from a terrible background or is just plain stupid they should be permitted to forgo rational thought when confronted with adversity?

But it is.

Flord state law define self defense as the use of force under a reasonable belief that it is necessary to defend against an imminent threat.

She raised her fist. How is that not an imminent threat?

Because the belief isn't reasonable. He's a college athlete (and a football player at that) and she's a drunk girl.
 
Yes? Are you going to explain why I can't?

Because you have yet to identify what "proportional" force is in this instance, and I don't have faith that you will find suitable metrics that will convince me. It seems we won't agree since we have different interpretations of the term proportional force.
 
But it is.

Flord state law define self defense as the use of force under a reasonable belief that it is necessary to defend against an imminent threat.

She raised her fist. How is that not an imminent threat?

Florida law requires a reasonable and proportional use of force when defending one's self. He was not reasonable in believing the level of force used against him required the level of force he responded with.
 
How is this not sexist against females? You are basically calling her a delicate flower.


Are you being intentionally obtuse or is this just how you roll? You have a basketball avatar, would it be sexist of me to say that she won't be winning a 1 on 1 against a collegiate athlete based on her airballing a free throw granny style? Because that's what we're talking about here.
 
He pretty clearly grabbed her before she threw that punch. He definitely started that, you don't just grab people like that. Him throwing and landing that punch basically seals the deal of it being full blown assault. No sympathy for him there.

He grabbed her because she raised a fist, which is a threatening gesture.

The prosecution is going to have to convince a jury that this helpless lass who then wrestled free in order to successfully land her originally planned blow, was a victim of a vicious assault.
 
He grabs her after threatened. Should he have just let her hit him? And when he lets her go she immediately attacks him.

He grabs her after she says words. Just to play along, if I were a betting man, I'd bet she was saying something along the lines of "Stop rubbing/pushing against me". Instead of that he grabs her and pushes her back, she only punches after this. He should have found another place at the bar.

Pretty infuriating to see people talk down on others as if they're superior over cultural differences.

In my culture from a very young age you are taught to fight back if assaulted no matter the circumstances. Parents and peers both preached this. In my culture it's okay to physically discipline your child. These things are okay where I was raised, so why does someone raised in a nice neighborhood with parents who were at work all the time so never disciplines them gets the right to talk down on people who were raised and taught differently. It's such a superiority complex in these people's minds that it angers me.

I could show all my friends and strangers the GIFS in OP and they would all commend the guy for striking her. But people from a different angle of life will call him a thug, violent, and uncivilized and talk down as if they don't have cultural faults.

Interesting insight you have on some of the other poster's upbringings, do tell, where you got such information?
 
Exactly. The heat of the moment.

I've been suckered by someone at a club once and felt furious. Punched the guy back and it was broken up. But that feeling is almost uncontrollable when it happens to you under varying circumstances. I really wish people could take a punch and walk away but it doesn't happen every time.

I'm not saying it's correct or "proportional", but you can't expect someone to act accordingly in these situations. Clearly, this can lead to potentially horrible outcomes for everyone involved but don't expect the rational response and blame one party for not doing the "right thing".

I've been sucker punched before as well and I couldn't recall a single coherent thought until shortly after the fight was over. That's how that usually goes, but some posters here would have you believe the guy stalked off to brood and then came back and unleashed his wrath on her for bismirching his honour or some shit.
 
He could move, he could attempt to continue restraining her as he was or restrain her some other way, he could push her in any number of different way, etc.



Yes? Are you going to explain why I can't?



And I would say you're obviously wrong.



Because hitting her in the face is not a reasonable or proportional response.



First an irrelevant point and then a strawman.

All bullshit alternatives that didn't help my brother not get punched and kicked while being called a "dirty spic" by an exgirlfeind who then stabbed him with a pair of scissors.

So your infinite amount of possibilities sure did work out well for him huh ?
 
So let me get this straight: you're saying that if someone comes from a terrible background or is just plain stupid they should be permitted to forgo rational thought when confronted with adversity?

I was taught to defend yourself if struck, even by a weaker opponent. That is how I was raised, just because you were raised differently doesn't make my way irrational and yours rational. It's a cultural thing. It's only irrational to you to strike a woman because you were told otherwise/haven't fought a strong woman before. The law permits self defense, so don't know wtf you're even talking about with the rational argument, if what he did was so barbaric then there wouldn't be such a clash of opinions in the topic.


But you just prove my point with your superior tone.
 
Sincere question, could what she was doing be considered assault or battery? If so, might that not actually mitigate his legal burden?

It's possible I suppose, if what the player claims is true. I don't really think he was in much danger at any point (and I definitely don't believe he ever felt he was in danger of physical harm). But even if we assume she committed a crime as well I don't think that removes any burden on him to only respond reasonably.
 
He grabbed her because she raised a fist, which is a threatening gesture.

The prosecution is going to have to convince a jury that this helpless lass who then wrestled free in order to successfully land her originally planned blow, was a victim of a vicious assault.

She threatening to punch him when he grabs her wrist. She literally aiming her fist at him.

And why did she punch him? Because he grabbed her.

I have no idea what was said or if he was being threatening there, but that argument is basically a "dehumanizing stare" type of argument.
 
And why did she punch him? Because he grabbed her.

I have no idea what was said or if he was being threatening there, but that argument is basically a "dehumanizing stare" type of argument.

You really need to watch the video again. He grabbed her hand because she was about to punch him.
 
Man, some of the hyperbole in here...

I'm a guy. If someone intentionally punches me, I'm gonna punch back. Whether it's a guy or girl. If I stupidly punch someone, I'd expect them to clock me, guy or girl. She instigated a fight. She cut him off, blew up on him, threatened him, attempted to punch him, supposedly attacked the sack. She deserved that hit.
 
And why did she punch him? Because he grabbed her.

I have no idea what was said or if he was being threatening there, but that argument is basically a "dehumanizing stare" type of argument.

Balding up one's fist is not the same as a dehumanizing stare


wait I guess it is the same if one is from a black male and the other is a poor white girl who doesnt know shit about getting physical according to people itt
 
Are you being intentionally obtuse or is this just how you roll? You have a basketball avatar, would it be sexist of me to say that she won't be winning a 1 on 1 against a collegiate athlete based on her airballing a free throw granny style? Because that's what we're talking about here.
Since he obviously got to watch and dissect a video replay of her punch before responding with his own punch, we can clearly confirm that he knowingly overreacted.
 
I don't think so. I've never known a person who was truly unfamiliar with physical violence to start immediately punching and kicking groins.

Look at her body language. She's ready to get physical the second he bumped into her.

We'll have to agree to disagree.

It's called being a drunk asshole at a bar. I don't know man, you're going to need some soaring rhetoric to make her out to be a feral, vicious attacker. In no way is that a justified reaction to her mushing her hand against his face.


Since he obviously got to watch and dissect a video replay of her punch before responding with his own punch, we can clearly confirm that he knowingly overreacted.

He got to feel it "landing", didn't he? Let's get to the real point: That was in no way physically threatening, he may have taken it as a threat to his ego however.
 
Pretty infuriating to see people talk down on others as if they're superior over cultural differences.

In my culture from a very young age you are taught to fight back if assaulted no matter the circumstances. Parents and peers both preached this. In my culture it's okay to physically discipline your child. These things are okay where I was raised, so why does someone raised in a nice neighborhood with parents who were at work all the time so never disciplines them gets the right to talk down on people who were raised and taught differently. It's such a superiority complex in these people's minds that it angers me.

I could show all my friends and strangers the GIFS in OP and they would all commend the guy for striking her. But people from a different angle of life will call him a thug, violent, and uncivilized and talk down as if they don't have cultural faults.

I was raised pretty similarly, and I hate violence, don't think you should fight or hit people if you can avoid it and it's not worth the risk escalating confrontations.

I'm not speaking as someone from a nice neighborhood, or from a family with money or from someone who wasn't physically disciplined. You don't need to let the culture your grew up with rule you man.
 
His response was way too much. Anyways, this thread seems to be going the same way as that other thread with Afroman knocking out the woman dancing on stage. Terrible.
 
Because the belief isn't reasonable. He's a college athlete (and a football player at that) and she's a drunk girl.
She didn't know he was an athlete and he didn't know if she was drunk (assuming she even was drunk). Throw those things out and what we have left is a woman trying to prevent a guy from standing next to her, raising her arm as if to punch (for no apparent reason other than him wanting the space next to here), being restrained from throwing the punch, throwing a punch, and then him immediately retaliating. She's an asshole just like him. She escalated it and he may have overdid it, but his response was directly related to her initial actions.
 
It's called being a drunk asshole at a bar. I don't know man, you're going to need some soaring rhetoric to make her out to be a feral, vicious attacker. In no way is that a justified reaction to her mushing her hand against his face.

"Mushing her hand against his face."

Is that what we're calling closed fist punches these days?
 
Because the belief isn't reasonable. He's a college athlete (and a football player at that) and she's a drunk girl.

OK, just so I'm understanding you correctly, so you're asserting the fact he's an athlete is relevant to whether or not he could reasonably believe that a raised fist could indicate an imminent threat?

Florida law requires a reasonable and proportional use of force when defending one's self. He was not reasonable in believing the level of force used against him required the level of force he responded with.

And you're saying that a single, reactionary punch is disproportionate because he's an athlete, even though it's blatantly obvious that there was hardly any swing or much force behind it and the fact the "victim" didn't sustain any serious injury?

Am I getting this right?

I disagree completely.
 
I was taught to defend yourself if struck, even by a weaker opponent. That is how I was raised, just because you were raised differently doesn't make my way irrational and yours rational. It's a cultural thing. It's only irrational to you to strike a woman because you were told otherwise/haven't fought a strong woman before. The law permits self defense, so don't know wtf you're even talking about with the rational argument, if what he did was so barbaric then there wouldn't be such a clash of opinions in the topic.
What is your culture, where do you come from? Do you know Tyler Durden?
 
And why did she punch him? Because he grabbed her.

Are you being this obtuse on purpose?

She verbally confronts him and winds up for a punch with her right fist. [This is assault]
He grabs her raised right arm. [Self defence]
She punches him with her free left arm. [This is battery]
He then punches her. [This is battery]

If Johnson had left it there, it would be a cut and dry case of assault and battery. Because he retaliated, rather than escaping the situation, it would be difficult to defend his actions as self defence.

Johnson was changed with battery, she should be charged with assault and battery.

Other than her race or sex being behind it, I have no idea why she hasn't been charged as well.
 
You really need to watch the video again. He grabbed her hand because she was about to punch him.

Balding up one's fist is not the same as a dehumanizing stare


wait I guess it is the same if one is from a black male and the other is a poor white girl who doesnt know shit about getting physical according to people itt

LOL fucking please, get out of here with that garbage. Next you're going to tell me about the SJWs and "race baiting", right?

He was already pushing her pretty damn hard, and not only does he grab her fist, he pushes it inwards further towards her. I have no idea how you don't see that this is pretty clearly textbook assault on his end.
 
And you're saying that a single, reactionary punch is disproportionate because he's an athlete, even though it's blatant that there is hardly any swing or much force behind it and the fact the "victim" didn't sustain any serious injury?

Am I getting this right?

I disagree completely.

His status as an athlete is completely irrelevant. The force of his punch, and the potential for injury due to it, was much, much greater than the threat she represented.
 
They should both be charged or neither. At least, that's how I see this situation.
She's not going to be charged. He will be. I could have predicted that without even reading it from the article. An athlete detonated a woman's face after she threw a punch that wouldn't hurt a wet tissue. What other outcome were people expecting?
 
LOL fucking please, get out of here with that garbage. Next you're going to tell me about the SJWs and "race baiting", right?

He was already pushing her pretty damn hard, and not only does he grab her fist, he pushes it inwards further towards her. I have no idea how you don't see that this is pretty clearly textbook assault on his end.

bMk0OAx.png


What do you call what she is doing here?

So now we're arguing pre-emptive measures as self defense? And I disagree about the "about to punch part".

She was about to punch him so he held her fist back and then she still punched him. So, I guess?
 
He was already pushing her pretty damn hard, and not only does he grab her fist, he pushes it inwards further towards her. I have no idea how you don't see that this is pretty clearly textbook assault on his end.

Where is the "pushing pretty damn hard"?

xpptZ8i.gif
 
I think people are saying neither party is innocent.

That's my stance. Both acted like pieces of shit. I think they both had the opportunity to walk away, but didn't. Legally they might both be covered by the statute posted earlier, if they both claim self defense, but FSU made the right decision regardless.
 
LOL fucking please, get out of here with that garbage. Next you're going to tell me about the SJWs and "race baiting", right?

He was already pushing her pretty damn hard, and not only does he grab her fist, he pushes it inwards further towards her. I have no idea how you don't see that this is pretty clearly textbook assault on his end.

Grabbing someone's bald up fist who's about to punch you is assault now?

tqHARym.png
 
"Mushing her hand against his face."

Is that what we're calling closed fist punches these days?

you make it sound like he took one on the chin from Mike Tyson

she barely hits him. he barely even reacts to the force of it.

i mean he's so devastated by that hard punch that he cold cocks her like 1.5 seconds later.

good golly are we watching the same video
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom