D
Deleted member 8095
Unconfirmed Member
He walked in, asked for money, and they gave it to him. Relax.
That makes the theft of $75,000 ok?
He walked in, asked for money, and they gave it to him. Relax.
Victim blaming. Neat.
No, but you act as if this was an armed robbery.That makes the theft of $75,000 ok?
I think the term may be 'Casing the joint'. Hopefully Organized Crime Gaf will chime in.
I think most people, outside of the Supreme Court, would agree with this statement. But are you saying that corporations cannot be victims of certain crimes? They're allowed to own property,and when that property is damaged or stolen, are they not victims? I'm just not sure where you're going with this...What? He is blaming Walmart. Walmart is not a person.
If he waved a gun in their faces, then I would agree with you.
Handing the money over to a guy who just says "I'm with Loomis" while wearing clothes that vaguely resemble a Loomis uniform should get you fired.
PM me when you need a partner. 50/50 split?Honestly, I've considered doing something like this. Armored car guys wear uniforms (which makes them visually interchangeable) and follow set schedules (which makes them predictable). You show up in the right place, at the right time, in the right outfit, and you're 90% of the way there. You'd just have to go to different places on the route, around when they'd be expecting you, and keep going in until you find somewhere that is lax about ID.
Regardless of how much they're paid, it doesn't absolve them of their failure to do their job correctly. Thus, they should be fired.It should also make them reconsider how much they pay their employees if they literally have no fucks to give about protocol.
Probably grand larceny and impersonating a security officer.
How do they not have a super strict protocol about identification in this process?
It should also make them reconsider how much they pay their employees if they literally have no fucks to give about protocol.
I dont really see how though.
The money was willingly given.
Also, his clothes look nothing like the Loomis uniform. Let's say he didn't show any credentials or claimed to be a security officer at any time, would it still count as impersonating a security officer?
The two CO, the Asm or whoever signed, the SM, maybe even then front end supervisor are all fired. I'm sure gaf is fine and happy a bunch of people lost their jobs. It's not exactly easy to find another management job.
Dude, Walmart will throw the book at him. We had a shoplifter pretend to be an associate and he took a bunch of items. He got caught and ended up doing a few years. he only stole a couple thousand.
"Man posing as armored car driver," not "man posing as armored car."
I think most people, outside of the Supreme Court, would agree with this statement. But are you saying that corporations cannot be victims of certain crimes? They're allowed to own property,and when that property is damaged or stolen, are they not victims? I'm just not sure where you're going with this...
This guy just walked in and was given money.
Thats completely different though. This guy just walked in and was given money. I'm really interested on what ll happen if they catch him
I dont really see how though.
The money was willingly given.
Also, his clothes look nothing like the Loomis uniform. Let's say he didn't show any credentials or claimed to be a security officer at any time, would it still count as impersonating a security officer?
Correct. It could even be argued that this was not theft, as the money was willingly given with Walmart's consent. One could argue that they are at fault for negligence.
He'll still get punished if caught though, I mean, the plan was essentially to take money that wasn't his.
75,000? That's nothing, not worth the risk of getting shot at by police or potential jail time he could face
The guy wasn't just walking by the store when a Walmart Employee ran out and handing him a bag of cash. He went into the store with the intention of fraudulently taking however much cash he could from Walmart. This is the very definition of "larceny" in Oklahoma:Thats completely different though. This guy just walked in and was given money. I'm really interested on what ll happen if they catch him
What this guy did was grand larceny:§21 1701. Larceny defined.
Larceny is the taking of personal property accomplished by fraud or stealth, and with intent to deprive another thereof.
And can net him 5 years in prison:§21-1704. Grand and petit larceny defined.
Grand larceny is larceny committed in either of the following cases:
1. When the property taken is of value exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00).
§21-1705. Grand larceny a felony.
Grand larceny is a felony punishable by imprisonment in the State Penitentiary not exceeding five (5) years if the value of the property is Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or more
No, it's not correct. And there is absolutely no way, under the facts we know now, that this was not theft. There is no crime for "negligently allowing someone to steal your property," nor is that a cognizable defense to theft in any jurisdiction based upon English common law.Correct. It could even be argued that this was not theft, as the money was willingly given with Walmart's consent. One could argue that they are at fault for negligence.
I think the term may be 'Casing the joint'. Hopefully Organized Crime Gaf will chime in.
No, but you act as if this was an armed robbery.
People always had a soft spot for cunning trick thieves getting something from a rich, hated body.
When speaking of real world experience.
Two sided coin: theft of 75k bucks, cunning clever nonviolent execution
Two reactions.
The guy wasn't just walking by the store when a Walmart Employee ran out and handing him a bag of cash. He went into the store with the intention of fraudulently taking however much cash he could from Walmart. This is the very definition of "larceny" in Oklahoma:
What this guy did was grand larceny:
And can net him 5 years in prison:
No, it's not correct. And there is absolutely no way, under the facts we know now, that this was not theft. There is no crime for "negligently allowing someone to steal your property," nor is that a cognizable defense to theft in any jurisdiction based upon English common law.
Wouldn't have happened if store clerk had a gun.
5 years appears to be the max for the larceny. I'm not sure if Oklahoma has any criminal statutes against impersonating an armored car driver, but that could be another offense he gets hit with if they do.So 5 years is the max, I figure it wouldnt huge, now if he has a record, it could be more. If its his first time and he gets caught he prob do a year at most.
75k is he gonna deposit it or put it in his mattress lol
I dont really see how though.
The money was willingly given.
Also, his clothes look nothing like the Loomis uniform. Let's say he didn't show any credentials or claimed to be a security officer at any time, would it still count as impersonating a security officer?
Dude, walmart associates get paid pretty good now. $9 and soon to be $10, and with 30-50 cent raises. hourly Supervisors get paid $13-$15/hour, do you know how easy it is to get promoted? People act as if Walmart pays us nothing. Many of our long timers are making $20+/hour. As shitty as Walmart is we do get paid well enough to care.
Dude, Walmart will throw the book at him. We had a shoplifter pretend to be an associate and he took a bunch of items. He got caught and ended up doing a few years. he only stole a couple thousand.
New York. Chicago. Bristow. Los Angeles.I feel like I'm being trolled here, but on the off-chance you're serious: $9-10/hour in 2015 is still well into "fuck you, you're cheap and replaceable labor" territory. I was making $10.50/hr in 1996 doing technical support, which in 1996 had the same buying power as $15.91/hr does today source. An associate making $9.50 today has only marginally more spending power than the 1996 federal minimum wage ($6.27) source
$9-15 is squarely in "not paid enough to give a fuck" territory, especially near anything resembling a large city.
No, but it is larceny.okay this guy is awesome
Is it really even robbery if they gave him the money?
But they are losing their jobs because of their own ineptitude. It's hard to feel bad for themThe two CO, the Asm or whoever signed, the SM, maybe even then front end supervisor are all fired. I'm sure gaf is fine and happy a bunch of people lost their jobs. It's not exactly easy to find another management job.