You don't think the committees know this stuff?
You don't think the committees know this stuff?
They need to say it loud and proud: Trump needs to go!
God, democrats are such useless losers. Just complete doormats. Utter garbage.
What time is this tomorrow?
I don't believe the thread title is accurate currently. He asked Coats to intervene.
I actually think the real news will be Trump's response. Comey will probably confirm everything we know, but Trump won't be able to shut his stupid mouth. He sent 4 tweets during the Yates testimony, I think he's going to unleash the floodgates here.I am not looking at much coming out from the interview Thursday. I firmly believe that stuff is happening and happened but it is an open investigation.
Trumps response to things said on Thursday is what I will be watching.
I don't believe the thread title is accurate currently. He asked Coats to intervene.
I don't see you taking action. Yes, I'm aware you're not a bright troll.
The hearing is Thursday 10 am eastern.
Wonder if they have anything in store for us tomorrow night.
You don't know shit about me.
Yeah, this is a rare case where the subject is actually more dramatic than the title suggests.
Both are true actually, lol
Coats is testifying tomorrow.Thought there was something tomorrow?
Thought there was something tomorrow?
It's spelled Coats, everybody.
Where are their chants of "lock him up"? Instead it's a constant refrain of: well you know we need to see this investigation through, so far there is no evidence blah blah.
The amount of leaks at every level just shows how much people can't stand what Trump has been up to and is up too.
I've never seen anywhere close to this much inside info that's coming from such high up.
Because of course he did.
The amount of leaks at every level just shows how much people can't stand what Trump has been up to and is up too.
I've never seen anywhere close to this much inside info that's coming from such high up.
Where are their chants of "lock him up"? Instead it's a constant refrain of: well you know we need to see this investigation through, so far there is no evidence blah blah.
God, democrats are such useless losers. Just complete doormats. Utter garbage.
John Schindler broke this 10 days ago:
http://observer.com/2017/05/mike-rogers-nsa-chief-admits-trump-colluded-with-russia/
This is clearly something an innocent man does.
Bring it all down.
I don't understand how this is your first reaction to this story
Because I just saw this D-Senator on CNN being asked if obstruction of justice would be an impeachable offense in his eyes - and he wouldn't even commit to that. He went on and on about how this investigation needs to be done right and his "grocery store test" theory.
Then I read this news and all I can think of is how toothless the Dems have been. Just fucking say it already. Trump needs to be impeached. Drive the narrative. Don't be a bystander. History will look back kindly on you.
It's really not the time to be going around for impeachment imo. We're almost there, but more pieces need to fall before it doesn't sound like blind Trump hate(not that there aren't all the reasons in the world, but media play Will be against it until then).Because I just saw this D-Senator on CNN being asked if obstruction of justice would be an impeachable offense in his eyes - and he wouldn't even commit to that. He went on and on about how this investigation needs to be done right and his "grocery store test" theory.
Then I read this news and all I can think of is how toothless the Dems have been. Just fucking say it already. Trump needs to be impeached. Drive the narrative. Don't be a bystander. History will look back kindly on you.
You don't know shit about me.
Please try to improve clarity if you're going to link a major story like this. I've redone it, but original OP and its sparse quote with little context did not convey much. If you're unsure how to go about a fair use excerpt when linking a breaking story like this, remember that there are very specific formatting guidelines that outlets like NYT and WaPo have followed since back in the olden print days. They summarize the critical info in the headline and opening paragraph, then steadily expand the scope of the supporting details with the rest of the word count, regularly doubling back a bit to summarize again so that readers don't get lost. The bombs are usually front-loaded, with the deep dives that back it up coming afterwards.
was that not just restating the earlier reporting by WaPo? People were skeptical of that Observer article for other reasons (namely, the title that flatly says Rogers admitted that Trump colluded with Russia, something that's not really substantiated in the article itself), not that Rogers was asked to push back against the FBI probe.John Schindler broke this 10 days ago:
http://observer.com/2017/05/mike-rogers-nsa-chief-admits-trump-colluded-with-russia/
Since he has been corroborated by MSM, can we start posting his articles again without fear of the lock?