• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

(WaPo) Trump asked Coats & Rogers to intervene in Comey's investigation; refused

Verelios

Member
Trump is going to go down in history as our generations Nixon, except unapologetically racist, selfish and about 100* worse in hindsight.
 

KHarvey16

Member
I am almost 100% positive this was posted here awhile back, and it wasn't Schindler. Am I imagining things?

A story about Trump asking both of them to publicly deny there was collusion came out a couple weeks back. This new story goes a bit further regarding what Trump requested.
 

RPGCrazied

Member
Trump is going to go down in history as our generations Nixon, except unapologetically racist, selfish and about 100* worse in hindsight.

Might be a reason to that. To this day we talk about Watergate, books about it, movies. Maybe Trump is wanting that spotlight. Its apparent he has no clue what he is doing as President. Its all about the $$$$ to Trump.
 
6zypaIu.png
 
A story about Trump asking both of them to publicly deny there was collusion came out a couple weeks back. This new story goes a bit further regarding what Trump requested.

It doesn't help that they put a picture and tag before this article about the previous one. I wasn't sure what I was reading for a moment.
 
But Trump was just trying to save the FBI's resources and alleviate their workload! He knows he's completely innocent, so by dropping the investigation they'd be saving so much money that's not needed!

Frankly, based on that, not dropping the investigation... why, it's tantamount to treason!

Your name doesn't happen to be chris does it
 

Derwind

Member
Does he think more obstruction of justice is going to help him with a case of obstruction of justice? This would be funny if it was a plot in Archer... (_-_)
 
Rachel Maddow just reported that Coats' office has released a statement saying he never felt pressured by POTUS to drop the investigation and never speaks about his private conversations with POTUS.
 
I am almost 100% positive this was posted here awhile back, and it wasn't Schindler. Am I imagining things?

It was Schindler

http://observer.com/2017/05/mike-rogers-nsa-chief-admits-trump-colluded-with-russia/

11 days ago, everyone waived it off because reasons and it was modlocked twice.

Everyone is sceptical bevause they think the guy is a loon, but has anyone actually did the hits vs misses with this guy, especially about Russia? I mean there was some documented stuff coming out about Mench, and he gets lumped in because they RT each other
 

shiba5

Member
from other thread.

Just when you think this family can't get any lower... How about stealing money from kids with cancer?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2017/06/06/how-donald-trump-shifted-kids-cancer-charity-money-into-his-business/#3a3b3fc26b4a

He once crashed an AIDS charity event for kids, sat on the stage, did the Macarena and then left without donating a penny. The story came out before the election.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?postshare=1591477767717547&tid=ss_tw
 
Rachel Maddow just reported that Coats' office has released a statement saying he never felt pressured by POTUS to drop the investigation and never speaks about his private conversations with POTUS.

They're getting better with the word games. Never felt pressured is a different statement than the conversation not taking place.
 

Random Human

They were trying to grab your prize. They work for the mercenary. The masked man.
Wait, was this the guy who gave that testimony where it looked like he wanted to vault over the table and strangle every Republican? Why the fuck would you try to get him to do anything for you. He was basically the most badassest looking guy I've ever seen outside of a movie.
 
11 days ago, everyone waived it off because reasons and it was modlocked twice.

Everyone is sceptical bevause they think the guy is a loon, but has anyone actually did the hits vs misses with this guy, especially about Russia? I mean there was some documented stuff coming out about Mench, and he gets lumped in because they RT each other
The part about Trump asking Rogers to push back against the FBI investigation was reported by mainstream outlets days earlier. The Observer even directly links to those reports. That's not why people had problems with that article.
 
Rachel Maddow just reported that Coats' office has released a statement saying he never felt pressured by POTUS to drop the investigation and never speaks about his private conversations with POTUS.

It was a very carefully worded statement. Now we know that this info was leaked by someone who wanted to force Coats hand at his hearing tomorrow. I'm sure Coats is quite pissed.
 
oh this isnt good. If he is testifying tomorrow they are already denying. Shit

No man of Coats' age and experience in Washington will lie under oath. He might duck the question in some artful way but he won't deny it categorically.

It works because maybe 10% of the people hearing it can decipher the lawyer talk.
 

KHarvey16

Member
What if Coats wanted an excuse to talk about it? Release the carefully worded statement after the fact to play the game and then answer questions honestly about what was said once he's in front of the committee. Baseless speculation, but would be interesting.
 

Chococat

Member
Wait, was this the guy who gave that testimony where it looked like he wanted to vault over the table and strangle every Republican? Why the fuck would you try to get him to do anything for you. He was basically the most badassest looking guy I've ever seen outside of a movie.

Best description.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
But what about Pompeo

Declined to comment, and no apparent leaks to the press:

A spokesman for Pompeo declined to comment on the closed-door discussions. The White House referred questions to outside lawyers, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

All we know on this angle, per WaPo, is that Coats and Pompeo were asked to stay in the room with Trump privately, and in that private meeting Coats was asked to interfere with Comey's investigation, which Coats refused. Given the nature of the meeting and the two parties specifically asked to stay for it, and also that NSA Director Rogers was asked to do the same thing around this time, we can pretty safely surmise that Pompeo was asked to do what Coats and Rogers were asked to do, but the CIA's not disclosing its end. A "no comment" here doesn't necessarily suggest whether Pompeo agreed or refused, and if Coats wasn't playing ball in that meeting then Pompeo would effectively be incriminating himself in front of Coats if he had agreed.

It seems like a huge strategic blunder to call them both into that room together. So, par for the course.
 

NervousXtian

Thought Emoji Movie was good. Take that as you will.
John Schindler broke this 10 days ago:

http://observer.com/2017/05/mike-rogers-nsa-chief-admits-trump-colluded-with-russia/


Since he has been corroborated by MSM, can we start posting his articles again without fear of the lock?

He's wrong all the time, and sent a dic pic to a twitter follower in the past while being married.

...so with anything Taylor/Mensch/Schindler ignore it unless a mainstream source runs with.

Private meetings and loyalty tests... Trump can't do the simplest shit right.
 
Trump may very well be doomed. Good!

Because I just saw this D-Senator on CNN being asked if obstruction of justice would be an impeachable offense in his eyes - and he wouldn't even commit to that. He went on and on about how this investigation needs to be done right and his "grocery store test" theory.

Then I read this news and all I can think of is how toothless the Dems have been. Just fucking say it already. Trump needs to be impeached. Drive the narrative. Don't be a bystander. History will look back kindly on you.

Here we go again...
 

reKon

Banned
I know people keep saying that he's unlikely that he gets impeached because of a republican controlled Congress, but won't it look terrible on them for future elections if they don't do anything?
 
I know people keep saying that he's unlikely that he gets impeached because of a republican controlled Congress, but won't it look terrible on them for future elections if they don't do anything?

How far into the future lol? Their current base has barely dipped a toe to test the waters of giving a fuck
 
Top Bottom