Templars were integrated into the Space Marine codex.
Wow that's a bummer for Templars fans. Presumably they didn't sell enough to warrant another stand alone dex in GW's eyes.
Templars were integrated into the Space Marine codex.
Can someone explain Squats to me and why they're so controversial?I know what you mean, but it really is a bit deeper than that too. The IG are treated as cannon fodder ala WW1 trench warfare or Russians during Stalingrad. Space Marines are like super versions of modern day special forces with a large dose of warrior monk mixed in. The Eldar's highly trained citizen army is comparable to modern Israel, right down to both sexes serving. Tau are like a combination of mecha and Star Trek with Communist overtones. The Dark Eldar are all basically Cenobites from Hellraiser. The mash ups that GW do are absurd and amazing at the same time. Somehow it all works though. They can and do tweek their lore (see Squats), but so much of their stuff is borrowed or lifted from actual history and there just are not any famous battles in history containing forces that were predominately women or had female warriors.
As I understand it they were basically Space Dwarfs that GW killed off with a Tyranid invasion. Not sure why they did, maybe they thought they were too 'silly' for the grimdark galaxy they were going for.
Someone please feel free to correct me.
Can someone explain Squats to me and why they're so controversial?
Does anyone remember IG Beastmen? Yeah, that was a thing too!
2nd edition in general was insane. Grenades with dozen different effects, artillery firing shitload of randomly scattering templates, pimped up squads deep striking off the table, weapons jamming and exploding killing more of your own men then enemies (oh reaper autocannons, how I loved thee), rules upon rules everywhere, for everything. In retrospect, although it's probably nostalgia speaking, it was my favourite edition up to date.
Can someone explain Squats to me and why they're so controversial?
Jervis Johnson said:I know I shouldn't get drawn on this... but... can't... resist
Seriously, a couple of points just so you can have an informed debate based on the real reasons that Squats are no longer available. Be warned, it is going to be hard reading for people that like the Squat background.
First of all, Squats were *not* dropped because they were not selling well. There were then, and are now, plenty of other figure ranges that sell in the sort of % quantaties that the Squats pulled down, especially when you look across all of the ranges produced by GW rather than just those for 40K.
No, the reason that the Squats were dropped was because the creatives in the Studio (people like me, Rick, Andy C, Gav etc) felt that we had failed to do the Dwarf 'archetype' justice in its 40K incarnation. From the name of the race (Squats - what *were* we thinking?!?!) through to the short bikers motif, we had managed to turn what was a proud and noble race in Warhammer and the other literary forms where the archetype exists, into a joke race in 40K. We only fully realised what we had done when we were working on the 2nd edition of 40K. Try as we might, we just couldn't work up much enthusiasm for the Squats. The mistake we made then (deeply regreted since) was to leave them in the background and the 'get you by' army list book that appeared. With hindsight, we should have dropped the Squats back then, and saved ourselves a lot of grief later on.
Anyway, the Squats made it into 2nd edition, and since we were doing army books for each of the races, we started to try and figure out what to do with them. Unfortunately we just couldn't figure out a way to update them and get them to work that we felt was good enough. The 'art' of working on an army as a designer is to find the thing that you think is cool and exciting about an army, and work it up into a strong theme. This 'muse' didn't strike any of us, and so, rather than bring out a second-rate product simply re-hashing the old background, we kept doing other army books instead, with stuff we did feel inspired by.
Now, while this was all going on for 40K, we were actually doing some rather good stuff for the Squats in Epic. On this scale there was a natural tendancy to focus on the big 'hand-made' war machines the Squat artisans produced, and this created an army with a feel that was very different to the biker hordes in 40K. However, this tended to reinforce the problems we saw in the Squat background rather than alleviate them, underlining what we *should* have done with the Squats in 40K.
In the end (and it took years to really get to the roots of the problem) this led to a realisation that we were going to have to drop the Squats in their 'Squat' form from the 40K background. There was little point having a major race that we weren't willing to make an army book for, and their inclusion in the background meant that people kept asking us when we'd do a Squat Codex. Instead we decided that we'd write the Squats out of the background by saying that their Homworlds had been devoured by a Tyranid Hivefleet. This would give us the option in the future to return to making a race based ont he Squat archetype for 40K. This race was given the name of Demiurg, and a certain amount of preliminary work was done to get a 'feel' for what the race would be like. At present the only hint of the Demiurg in 40K is the Demiurg spaceship for BFG. However, we do have this race 'in our back pocket' as a possible new race for 40K, or an interesting character model in Inquisitor, or whatever. So far the Demiurg have lost out to other projects, and it may be that their time never actually comes, as they will have to win through on their merits, not simply because we once made some Squat models in the past. At present, I have to say that it is more lilely that they *don't* make the cut than do, as there is a certain predudice these days to simply taking races from Warhammer and cross them over to 40K like we did in the early days, so it may be that the Squats/Demiurg end up remaining a footnote in the history of the 40K galaxy. Only time will tell...
The second point I'd like to make is about 'old moulds'. In the past, Mail Order in the UK and US used to be the place that we kept all of the retired moulds for Citadel Miniatures, and we used to offer a service where you could order any Citadel Mniature ever made from MO. However, there are now so many of these 'back catalogue' miniatures that it is simply impossible to keep all of the old moulds in Mail Order and offer this service. Instead, we pick and choose which back catalogue miniatures are kept available. At present we're still struggling to produce special catalogues for these ranges (in the US there is the 'Phone Book' catalogue with everything in it, while the UK has special 'collectors guides' that are themed round a race). Once we've ironed out the kinks in the way we deal with the range of collectors models we want to keep permenantly available, the plan is to offer up other parts of the back catalogue for limited periods of time. In effect this will divide the back catalogue into three parts: a range of classic models that are permenantly available, a range of classic models we dip into and bring out for a limited release, and a range of retired models that will no longer be sold either because we've decided that they are embarrassingly bad, or because we are no longer allowed to sell them due to licencing agreement changes. So far we're still slowly working on deciding which classic models we want to keep permenantly available, and its going to take several years to work through just those. The old Squat range is most likely to end up as retired models, I have to say, though there is a good chance that the Squat war engines they could simply into the limited release classic range. Once again, only time will tell...
I'll finish off by saying that whatever we decide to do 'officially', there is nothing stopping players with Squat armies from using them, either in Epic or 40k for that matter. There is no GW 'rule' against using old Citadel Miniatures, as long as you use them with exisiting army lists and in a way that won't cause confusion for other players. I recommend taking a positive stand by saying "Have you seen these cool old models? They're called the Squats and GW used to make them back in the late eighties/early nineties. I love 'em, so I count them as Imperial Guard and use them with the current rules..." Put like this I can't imagine that anyone would stop you from using your army.
Best regards,
Jervis Johnson
Head Fanatic
The amount of detail people will put into their cosplay astounds me at times. Like the Demonettes who showed up topless to that German Con a few years ago. No one noticed till they were gone. Don't search if you are at work.
I found this cosplay that is pretty cool too.
Considering the quality and details, I would assume the guy who built this awesome piece of kit would make it match the proposed dimensions.Is that approximately to scale? I never realised they were that big.
Is that approximately to scale? I never realised they were that big.
The amount of detail people will put into their cosplay astounds me at times. Like the Demonettes who showed up topless to that German Con a few years ago. No one noticed till they were gone. Don't search if you are at work.
i just picked up flight of the einstein and fulgrim for 5 dollars each at a cheap book store, ive only read the first three heresy books so far so hopefully these are some of the better ones!
I loved Fulgrim, and... well, a lot of other people like Flight!
I found this cosplay that is pretty cool too.
I found this cosplay that is pretty cool too.
Searched as hard as I could, gonna need some help with this one.
You should have linked to the actual video, since the guy who made the suit also had an audio system in it.
"Look Quentus. Do you see what I see?"
Indeed. Lunch.
FOR THE EMPEROR!!"
Make sure to post pictures so I can tell you why it looks bad >=)
Just saw this on GW's website, for the low, low price of £7,065:
You should have linked to the actual video, since the guy who made the suit also had an audio system in it.
Just saw this on GW's website, for the low, low price of £7,065 (or $11,690):
http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA...m3450407a_99020101049_UMChapter01_873x627.jpg
http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA...3450412a_99020101049_UMChapter01a_873x627.jpg
I'll never get the hate for smurfsEww, smurf marines.
I'll never get the hate for smurfs
I mean they are not my favorite, but I don't dislike them either
I'll never get the hate for smurfs
I mean they are not my favorite, but I don't dislike them either
I'll never get the hate for smurfs
I mean they are not my favorite, but I don't dislike them either
Just saw this on GW's website, for the low, low price of £7,065 (or $11,690)