WB up for sale

Out of the known candidates, who do you think is gonna get it?

  • EA

    Votes: 11 3.1%
  • Take-Two

    Votes: 14 3.9%
  • Microsoft

    Votes: 174 48.5%
  • Sony

    Votes: 89 24.8%
  • Tencent

    Votes: 61 17.0%
  • Neteasy

    Votes: 5 1.4%
  • PUBG Corp.

    Votes: 5 1.4%

  • Total voters
    359
Do you understand that Microsoft will have to announce a buyout of the studios from another conglomerate if the deal goes through? Do you really think that while the regulators are checking Activation, they will abruptly close their eyes and not notice yet another cunning maneuver by Satya Nadella? Don't be an idiot

Ah yes, the regulators hawk eyes on a completely legitimate deal by the last place gaming competitor. And the cunning maneuver of doing further business by purchasing things. Microsoft can buy whatever the fuck it wants at any time of the day. I have no idea where this nonsense that they have to wait until middle of 2023 came from. Even if you hate microsoft and are the biggest sony fan, just inventing shit thats not true doesnt really serve anyone, no ?
 
Last edited:
Do you understand that Microsoft will have to announce a buyout of the studios from another conglomerate if the deal goes through? Do you really think that while the regulators are checking Activation, they will abruptly close their eyes and not notice yet another cunning maneuver by Satya Nadella? Don't be an idiot
Again they can purchase other companies they just bought another company recently just because it wasn't a gaming company no one talked about it. There's nothing stopping them from making a bid for WB studios and licensing if they plan of selling off individual studios. You're an idiot for thinking like a console warrior grow up this is an open market they can't stop making moves what if activision doesn't go through so they lose out on a potential deal with WB as well are you an idiot.
 
They will they have said many time that they are always on the look out for more studios
WB Games is huge and they have some great Studios and plus they were intrested in WB before they bought Activision

If NRS is up to sale, MS will 100% grab it. Other studios are not that important, but Microsoft will go after NRS whatever it takes.
 
I'm hoping Microsoft acquires WB and all of DC. Let's go baby!!!

2. Sony
3. EA
4. Take Two Interactive

The rest can fuck off.
 
So? Any deal above 100m is gonna be checked. In case of WB - without IPs especially (NRS will go with MK though) - it is just a bunch of studios. Embracer bought 40-60 last year or something :messenger_tears_of_joy:
I'm not telling you about the price, but that the ransom will literally be officially announced as soon as they close the deal.
So it was with EA when they bought out a mobile developer from the former owner of WB

Regulators would be better off not seeing anything from Microsoft at all until the Activision deal closes.
 
They will they have said many time that they are always on the look out for more studios
WB Games is huge and they have some great Studios and plus they were intrested in WB before they bought Activision

That's true, but with them where they are in the process with the AB acquisition the smart money would be on them not to announce any plans to do more acquisitions in the same space until they get FTC approval. It's a pretty easy argument against them if they have multiple acquisition targets in play with a deal the size of the one they're currently nursing.
 
Last edited:
I don't really care who ends up buying them, but I wish WB would do more with their DC properties. There's so much great shit they could do, and they sit there and do next to nothing with it.
 
I don't think Microsoft can go near anything big for a while as there is still the matter of getting Activision over the line.

How much are they worth?

Sony would likely keep the games Multiplatform, so they wouldn't be the worst option.
 
Last edited:
I don't think MS will be making any more big investments like this until their current one closes first.

edit: is there an echo in here you stealthy goblin :D
 
Last edited:
I doubt it will include DC IPs since their parent organization owns them. They will license those IPs to the familiar studios, however.

This is just for their gaming studios.
 
Personally, I'm only interested in Rocksteady. Because this is literally a studio that has the potential of Insomniac.
And they don't have to make superhero games.
 
That's true, but with them where they are in the process with the AB acquisition the smart money would be on them not to announce any plans to do more acquisitions in the same space until they get FTC approval. It's a pretty easy argument is for them to have multiple acquisition targets in play with a deal the size of the one they're currently nursing.
FTC won't do shit man FTC has no ground to block anything MS gaming division has no monopoly Tencent is still bigger in gaming
They can talk behind closed door and wait until the Activision deal is final before they announce another Acquisition deal
 
Would anyone really care about that Suicide Squad game?. I mean i know its Rocksteady so the game could end up good but even if its amazing, does anyone actually care?.

I'm saying. I just hate that IP in general lol I don't really get it, it comes across as cringe and corny. I'm not really a big comic person and I feel I'm set in my ways on what IP i like and don't like. It looks great on quality and I'm sure the team knows what they are doing, but I have a bad feeling on this one. It feels like it might be a flop, or at least compared to their past titles. DC has so many amazing IP that.....I don't get why they'd go with one that has a film bomb in the box office. I know they are not the same things of course, but shit take the temperature lol If those people didn't like that shit for 2 hours, but fuck me 20 to 30 hours and they going to like the game? Maybe not.

Why they didn't do some Justice League thing is beyond me.
 
Never understood the point of people fighting about acquisitions online. No one here knows shit about how any company will move or who they are in current negotiations with and for what reason.

Whoever buys them is gonna buy them whether you win this argument about logistics or what said company "needs" .


teamamerica-shhjustletithappen.gif
 
FTC won't do shit man FTC has no ground to block anything MS gaming division has no monopoly Tencent is still bigger in gaming
They can talk behind closed door and wait until the Activision deal is final before they announce another Acquisition deal

FTC can do plenty. MS gaming division doesn't have to be a monopoly for the FTC to try and block the acquisition. For example, Nvidia doesn't have a monopoly in the chip sector but the FTC blocked that acquisition.
 
Never understood the point of people fighting about acquisitions online. No one here knows shit about how any company will move or who they are in current negotiations with and for what reason.

Whoever buys them is gonna buy them whether you win this argument about logistics or what said company "needs" .


teamamerica-shhjustletithappen.gif
Might as well close down the forum then if it only make sense to discuss things we can affect.

FTC can do plenty. MS gaming division doesn't have to be a monopoly for the FTC to try and block the acquisition. For example, Nvidia doesn't have a monopoly in the chip sector but the FTC blocked that acquisition.
In the case of NVidia it was extra brutal, since their direct competitors own CPU divisions.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. And MS will avoid a situation where Sony again moneyhats bunch of fighting games (we still don't have Guilty Gear on the platform).
I don't really care about Moneyhat they all do it it fine & plus i buy Playstation too so i have no real shill for no one
i just want the games MK vs KI is my dream fighting game if it take MS buying up WB Netherrealm to get it then so be it
 
I don't really care about Moneyhat they all do it it fine & plus i buy Playstation too so i have no real shill for no one
i just want the games MK vs KI is my dream fighting game if it take MS buying up WB Netherrealm to get it then so be it
While I can afford both, I don't like Sony's ecosystem so each exclusive game is a pain.

No, they would be a monopoly.
They would be a monopoly with ARM. They would literally own most of the market. ARM is that big. It was nowhere near AMD + Xilinx situation.
 
Last edited:
They want to sell the studios and license out IPs...probably a smart move.

I dont care who does it but they better have day one PC releases then:
Buy Monolith and remake FEAR and Condemned.

Epic should throw down and get Rocksteady and Montreal have them be their premiere Unreal Engine 5 developer.
^Just to spite people who hate EGS and Tencent.

NetherRealm needs to stay third party, Mortal Kombat cant go to MS or Sony, which i guess leaves Take-Two.

Every other studio...who gives a shit.

Bring back FEAR!
capsule_616x353.jpg
 
FTC can do plenty. MS gaming division doesn't have to be a monopoly for the FTC to try and block the acquisition. For example, Nvidia doesn't have a monopoly in the chip sector but the FTC blocked that acquisition.
HAHA no and not the same situation lol FTC are a bunch of clowns
 
Jesus, all this Twitter rumor shit. Every day some new crackpot nutty theory about who buys who.
You don't even need to be an insider to guess it. WB/Discovery is probably looking at Disney and what they are doing in the gaming space, if they were to copy Disney they would try to license their IPs instead of having their own devs.
 
Last edited:
We literally have Schreier's article saying that the regulator has gotten stricter and Microsoft won't close the deal as easily as it did with Bethesda.

Do you really think that they are going to risk such a huge asset even for a second for the sake of a couple of studios that already have games in development for all platforms?
We also have other articles, like the law guy, saying that Schreier's article is bullshit.

I think they wouldn't do it if it really is a risk. I doubt it is though, I can't see how even buying WB game studios would change the landscape at all
 
FTC won't do shit man FTC has no ground to block anything MS gaming division has no monopoly Tencent is still bigger in gaming
They can talk behind closed door and wait until the Activision deal is final before they announce another Acquisition deal
Yes, we're all anecdotally aware of what we believe the facts are. But part of what the FTC does is gauge impact and if Microsoft has multiple acquisitions in play in the same sector of commerce it could give the appearance that they're saying one thing and doing another. If the FTC couldn't "do shit" we wouldn't have already seen Microsoft making very public announcements about how they intend to operate as a company post-acquisition. They can do shit, and Microsoft could also do shit to sabotage it.
 
I mean... it is also a very different bussines as well. I dunno if all of those TV/Film executives are going to be able to stomach AAA game development.
They done a stupid Matrix sequel so they could make a game about it... I dunno maybe you are right, they realized not all is easy how they thought.
 
I picked PUBG Corp because they're probably the smallest company on that list so they'd have the most incentive to keep the status quo. Plus they aren't a platform holder, so they wouldn't be able to leverage the acquisition in a way to eat up market share in a way where they can control a large segment of the market (regardless if they're heavy-handed in doing it or not).

But chances are they aren't selling to anyone. Hopefully not, anyway.

FTC won't do shit man FTC has no ground to block anything MS gaming division has no monopoly Tencent is still bigger in gaming
They can talk behind closed door and wait until the Activision deal is final before they announce another Acquisition deal

Tencent owns very few gaming studios outright and virtually no gaming publishers last I checked. They also don't have a gaming console, gaming network or subscription service that they can use their acquisitions (or majority shares, in Tencent's case) with as leverage to push said products to gain and control large portions of market share.

Plus, most of Tencent's gaming revenue comes from mobile by far, which is a lot different than console gaming in several major ways.
 
Last edited:
Jesus, all this Twitter rumor shit. Every day some new crackpot nutty theory about who buys who.
Unless we stop giving attention to people on twitter they will not stop it. They only have "power" because people choose to gave them attention.

I would say, ban twitter rumors. If we want some random dude making up rumors we can do it from here.
 
Yes, we're all anecdotally aware of what we believe the facts are. But part of what the FTC does is gauge impact and if Microsoft has multiple acquisitions in play in the same sector of commerce it could give the appearance that they're saying one thing and doing another. If the FTC couldn't "do shit" we wouldn't have already seen Microsoft making very public announcements about how they intend to operate as a company post-acquisition. They can do shit, and Microsoft could also do shit to sabotage it.
MS is not stupid to announce multiple acquisition at once even though i think it would still go through if FTC did not block Disney of buying up 21st century Fox
they won't block any of these gaming acquisition
 
MS is not stupid to announce multiple acquisition at once even though i think it would still go through if FTC did not block Disney of buying up 21st century Fox
they won't block any of these gaming acquisition

Honest question: why do you want Microsoft to buy yet more publishers so soon? I would think they already have enough in their XGS studios, Zenimax, and soon ABK, to have enough content for Xbox & GamePass in terms of 1P. Anything beyond that approaching a publisher is overkill IMO.

Plus, wouldn't you like to see the results Microsoft can actually produce with their current acquisitions in projects made under them from the ground-up, before asking for more big purchases? I wouldn't like for any company to buy so much that they end up vaulting a lot of that like Disney is currently doing with most of the Fox IPs (let alone some of their own).
 
That's the problem. Eventually.
With Microsoft I can even get Play Anyway and play the same game on Xbox and PC seamlessly.
Well yeah all eco system has their thing if you want to play Playstation games day 1 you will need a PS5
if you can wait a couple years then im sure it will all hit PC
Sony new pc plan is already into full effect
hell maybe they will even go full day 1 on pc who knows
 
Well yeah all eco system has their thing if you want to play Playstation games day 1 you will need a PS5
if you can wait a couple years then im sure it will all hit PC
Sony new pc plan is already into full effect
hell maybe they will even go full day 1 on pc who knows
And what about seamless save transfer then?

All in all, I don't trust Sony in their PC initiatives.
 
Last edited:
Honest question: why do you want Microsoft to buy yet more publishers so soon? I would think they already have enough in their XGS studios, Zenimax, and soon ABK, to have enough content for Xbox & GamePass in terms of 1P. Anything beyond that approaching a publisher is overkill IMO.

Plus, wouldn't you like to see the results Microsoft can actually produce with their current acquisitions in projects made under them from the ground-up, before asking for more big purchases? I wouldn't like for any company to buy so much that they end up vaulting a lot of that like Disney is currently doing with most of the Fox IPs (let alone some of their own).
Sony, MS need to keep buying cause if not them then it ill be Tencent, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Embracer etc
i would much rather Sony & MS do the buying then the other terrible options
 
Sony, MS need to keep buying cause if not them then it ill be Tencent, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Embracer etc
i would much rather Sony & MS do the buying then the other terrible options
What makes Tencent, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Embracer worst than MS or Sony for the players?
 
Last edited:
They would be a monopoly with ARM. They would literally own most of the market. ARM is that big. It was nowhere near AMD + Xilinx situation.

Intel, AMD, and others still exist so they would not be a monopoly. And FTC didn't even mention them becoming a monopoly in their challenge. They said it would reduce competition and innovation.

HAHA no and not the same situation lol FTC are a bunch of clowns

You mean the situation where you claim FTC are clowns and can do nothing? Actually Nvidia is an example of that exact situation.
 
Last edited:
What makes Tencent, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Embracer worst than MS or Sony for the players?
For me its simple. If Microsoft or Sony by a publisher, the games will still be sold as traditional games, at retail (for this gen anyway), and digital, plus having the games on sub plans, etc. If the likes of Google or Amazon by a publisher, those games may end up soley on their streaming platforms, something most people dont seem to want (streaming).
As for Tencent, well you shouldnt really need to ask.
 
Top Bottom