Not nearly well enough to form a satisfying step. The twist shouldn't require further explanation, the twist should provide the explanation.
Disagree. The twist itself is explained: "Bernard is a host." It does not need to completely show you the implications of that yet (since this isn't the biggest twist to be revealed, yet). Twists need to change how you look at the previous things you've been shown. This does that in spades
The viewer now knows, from Bernard, that at least one host has been passing for a human for potentially many years. Now with that info:
- nothing shown from Bernard's perspective can be trusted (Arnold photo)
- whatever Bernard told Dolores's father was probably directed by ford
- things told to Bernard, ford also knows and can use (Elise, details on Theresa if he's to make a copy)
- there could be other hosts posing as human (his wife)
- he could have implanted any memory into Bernard at will (dead son, wife conversation)
- Bernard talks to Dolores clothed. He's the only one that does this with a host. As a host, why would he do this if Ford is so adamant about NOT doing that. Implies that's not Bernard we are seeing with Dolores
All that shit is fantastic to me.