I honestly don't get where this sudden "GameCube renaissance" is coming from. Out of nowhere, a lot of Nintendo fans are now treating the GCN like it was some top-tier pillar of Nintendo's history. And let's be real: that shift only started happening because the Switch is flooded with GameCube-era remasters and ports, which naturally makes people look back with rose-tinted glasses.
But during its actual lifetime? The GameCube was far from the powerhouse people now pretend it was. Release schedules were wildly inconsistent, the system went through long droughts, the third-party support was shaky at best, and most first-party titles — aside from a few standouts like Smash Bros. Melee, F-Zero GX, the Metroid revival, and the birth of Pikmin — felt underwhelming compared to the creative peak Nintendo had reached on the N64. The console simply never produced a unified identity or momentum.
And this whole "it aged well!" argument that gets thrown around today is just another form of revisionism. What matters is how the console performed and was received at the time, not how people reinterpret it twenty years later through nostalgia filters. If a system only becomes "great" two decades after the fact, that tells you everything about how it actually fared in its own generation.