The only big names I can think of that could have a game out in 2016 are 3D Mario and Donkey Kong...and Zelda but that would likely have a Wii U version as well.
Metroid? F-zero? and of Course som New ip or some old like eternal darkness
The only big names I can think of that could have a game out in 2016 are 3D Mario and Donkey Kong...and Zelda but that would likely have a Wii U version as well.
Metodisk? F-zero? and of Course som New ip or some old like eternal darkness
It'll be like the GameCube where in the first few weeks we got Luigi's Mansion, Pikmin, Smash Bros Melee, Rogue Squadron 2 and Super Monkey Ball.
JP November 21, 2001
NA December 3, 2001
EU May 24, 2002
AUS May 31, 2002
Those are the release dates. EU/AUS was much later because they didn't get the GCN till then.
Sweet so I was right! Smash came out 3 months after the gamecube released in america
I thought it was N for Nintendo and X as in cross for cross development and intersecting of the handheld and console platforms. Hence NX refers to the entire architecture. I don't remember what made me think that though so I could be wrong.
Of course I amThat's an awesome lineup. You're saying that in a good way, right?
December 2nd, 2001 it came out in NA. GameCube was November 18th, 2001 I believe.I seem to remember Smash being delayed more than just a few weeks after launch. I thought it was a few months after GCN launched
I thought you'd like it. A particularly interesting moment in the new benchmark is how the dual-issue in-order A53 is less than 1.04x slower per clock than the dual-issue OoO Bobcat. In a damned REPL. That makes a 1.5GHz A53 in a grandma's smartphone faster than the 1.33GHz Bobcat in my netbook. When it comes to brainfuck, of course. When it comes to matrix multiplication that A53 just murders the Bobcat.lol
I approve this.
'Sir, we've been working on this fantasy RPG for two years now, I think you can finally tell us why you've been requiring us to call it 'the dildo' all this time.'Not at all. Code names mean nothing most of the time, they are designed to hide a project but still be able to account for expended resources, not always to inspire people. And they aren't always acronyms.
The code names for some of projects I've worked out have been far more obscure and random than NX, and have stood for absolutely nothing the team was able to figure out. Like a producers daughters imaginary friend and things like that.
There's nothing to read into with that name id imagine.
"Because it's so hard it'll fuck you."I thought you'd like it. A particularly interesting moment in the new benchmark is how the dual-issue in-order A53 is less than 1.04x slower per clock than the dual-issue OoO Bobcat. In a damned REPL. That makes a 1.5GHz A53 in a grandma's smartphone faster than the 1.33GHz Bobcat in my netbook. When it comes to brainfuck, of course. When it comes to matrix multiplication that A53 just murders the Bobcat.
'Sir, we've been working on this fantasy RPG for two years now, I think you can finally tell us why you've been requiring us to call it 'the dildo' all this time.'
weeks?
If we're getting the NX Platform this year, we'll probably get our unveiling well before E3. Whatever Nintendo has planned for E3 will probably be focused on the games.Big props to Hero of Legend and Neoxon for gathering all of this info in one topic.
With that said, if E3 is going to start June 14th and Nintendo follows suit with their usual event right before it opens, then that means we're possibly less than 5 months away from the NX's reveal at the latest (if we're still assuming a 2016 release). I'm excited if that's the case.
Guys, can we keep the discussion about what we know with sources instead of launching in wild speculations? Not to say it's not interesting, but we discussed all these things several times and we all know each other's point of view now. Let's keep modbot out of this thread please.
Miyamoto said:So, particularly with digital downloads now and the idea that you're downloading the right to play a game, that opens up the ability to have multiple platform digital downloads where you can download on one and download on another.
One of my theories was that the only physical media the NX would have is reading nfc chips of games from a card to download games if people want to have something tangible. But I don't think the world is ready yet for something all digital for various reasons.Ok, yeah we've had these discussions before, so let's just stick to the "facts". Here is a Miyamoto quote right from the OP. The first part of this quote seems to have been blocked out by some:
Now, Nintendo have clearly considered a digital console in the recent past, although it's possible the original context for that patent was a Wii U revision (it was originally filed in February 2014, when Nintendo may have been holding out some hope and trying to reduce costs on the console without ditching the Gamepad). Don't get me wrong, NX may very well ditch the disc drive, but in that case, I see 3rd party console publishers taking an approach similar to PC and mostly just utilizing digital distribution and download codes (or NFC cards/items) at retail. That is if we see that type of AAA support at all (those rumors of big devs not having kits yet makes you wonder). Nintendo may be going for a Shield TV type device and courting more indie and mobile devs. The odd Zelda or Metroid would just be what sets Nintendo apart from the other small set top boxes out there now.
We have been speculating something between 540p-720p on the handheld. Nintendo may not even need to increase Gamecard capacity in that case, especially if they do have 8 GB Gamecards already designed (do we know this?). For reference, Vita reportedly uses 2GB-4GB Gamecards, with Uncharted: Golden Abyss being one of the largest games and still under 4 GB.
Basically, any money spent/sacrificed on a new non-digital distribution method is money flushed down the toilet (as Takeda would say). It would be ludicrous for Nintendo to cut into their software margins when they are barely breaking even financially. Until someone produces hard numbers, there is no ground for claiming that simplified logistics can make up for the ~6x difference in format costs (even that is being very generous and based on the sources I provided earlier).
Hopefully this is enough on topic and has enough true facts to warrant posting. I just don't want people to be disappointed when they are expecting this magnificent "return to carts". If I end up being wrong and Zelda NX ships on a 64 GB Gamecard, I will happily eat crow.
It'll be like the GameCube where in the first few weeks we got Luigi's Mansion, Pikmin, Smash Bros Melee, Rogue Squadron 2 and Super Monkey Ball.
I suspect you're right that Nintendo will have a similar E3 reveal for NX as the Wii's E3 2006 game reel trailer where they showed off Mario Galaxy, TP, MP3, among many things and then the next day or two revealed Brawl.I believe RETRO has said in the past that each of their games take 3 years so we should at least be able to see it this year.
Could be a repeat of the Wii's reveal with us know it'll have Zelda, Metroid Prime/RETRO game, and a 3D Mario near launch and there's Pikmin 4 which is a thing, I guess.
We haven't heard a peep out of the 3D Mario team since 3D World so it's been awhile
While the quality and type of games will likely never happen again. I give props to Nintendo for the release schedule for the Wii, from launch up until MK Wii released. After that the release cycle was weak. However for the first year of release they were releasing million selling titles once a month. Followed by Brawl and MK Wii in the first half of 08.something like this will never happen again, unfortunately.
GameCube actually started off strong but died off when the droughts happened.And yet, this didn't save the GameCube sales-wise in the long run, did it?
OP should have a TL,DR : We dont know shit
If all games aren't playable, that will just defeat the purpose of having a unified platforms. In my mind it has to be all or nothing.
Ok, yeah we've had these discussions before, so let's just stick to the "facts". Here is a Miyamoto quote right from the OP. The first part of this quote seems to have been blocked out by some:
Now, Nintendo have clearly considered a digital console in the recent past, although it's possible the original context for that patent was a Wii U revision (it was originally filed in February 2014, when Nintendo may have been holding out some hope and trying to reduce costs on the console without ditching the Gamepad). Don't get me wrong, NX may very well ditch the disc drive, but in that case, I see 3rd party console publishers taking an approach similar to PC and mostly just utilizing digital distribution and download codes (or NFC cards/items) at retail. That is if we see that type of AAA support at all (those rumors of big devs not having kits yet makes you wonder). Nintendo may be going for a Shield TV type device and courting more indie and mobile devs. The odd Zelda or Metroid would just be what sets Nintendo apart from the other small set top boxes out there now.
Basically, any money spent/sacrificed on a new non-digital distribution method is money flushed down the toilet (as Takeda would say). It would be ludicrous for Nintendo to cut into their software margins when they are barely breaking even financially. Until someone produces hard numbers, there is no ground for claiming that simplified logistics can make up for the ~6x difference in format costs (even that is being very generous and based on the sources I provided earlier).
Hopefully this is enough on topic and has enough true facts to warrant posting. I just don't want people to be disappointed when they are expecting this magnificent "return to carts". If I end up being wrong and Zelda NX ships on a 64 GB Gamecard, I will happily eat crow.
One of my theories was that the only physical media the NX would have is reading nfc chips of games from a card to download games if people want to have something tangible. But I don't think the world is ready yet for something all digital for various reasons.
Zelda Wii U/NX, Smash NX port, Pikmin 4 and a 3D Mario. If we're being very unrealistic Dragon Quest XI as well.Well if - contrary to expectations - the NX launches Holiday 2017 then it sure as hell won't have any software droughts on launch lol.
Still not sure about Holiday 2016 though. What would you guys consider a good launch lineup? For me personally, Zelda NX would be enough if it releases around the same time as the Wii U version.
Zelda Wii U/NX, Smash NX port, Pikmin 4 and a 3D Mario. If we're being very unrealistic Dragon Quest XI as well.
I don't think there's been any leaks that Retro are working on a new Metroid Prime but it has been speculated. They're almost certainly working on an NX game though.Isn't Retro Studios working on a new Metroid Prime title specifically for the NX? Seeing one of those would help in a launch lineup.
Then again, we know that isn't what Retro Stuidos has been working on recently and not talking about. Could be a third Donkey Kong game, but I haven't been keeping up with this.
I don't quite remember pre-reveal next-gen console speculation being quite this nebulous. With the way the NX is muttered in hushed voices and all these rumors abound with no concrete frame of mind to work in, super advanced alien technology could have went into the design of this so called NX for all we know.
It's actually quite fascinating but I have this terrible suspicion that this NX will leave up to none of these huge expectations (not saying in this thread in particular, just in general). I hope Nintendo proves me wrong.
I've been open to a digital console that plays Gamecards for a long time. My sticking point is with traditional console games which require large amounts of data. Your CoDs and Assassin's Creeds. Ubi and Activision have shown they are willing to provide quick and dirty ports for even the tiniest profit. Has Wii U completely soured them on Nintendo platforms for the time being? Perhaps. I have tended to look to Nintendo's digital console patent, which mentions compatibility with an optical drive SKU. While I've considered dual sku consoles, at least for launch, I believe they're going to have to make a choice. If gamers are given the choice, we have seen that sales will be lopsided in favor of the more feature-rich SKU (read: the optical drive version).The resistance to a digital-only console would be absolutely palpable, but it's hard to rule it out. That being said, isn't this a drastic change from your original argument?
http://www.polygon.com/2015/6/22/88...s-always-thinking-games-it-doesnt-sell-tvs-orReggie Fils-Aime: said:"Let me put it this way," he said, after a long pause, "As we look at our software business, I find it startling, but once you think about it, not surprising that the digital mix of software is different game-by-game-by-game."
Fils-Aime says that Nintendo has found that games designed for people to play in short bursts, the sort of games you might always want to have with you, like Animal Crossing and Tomodachi Life, tend to do much better as digital sales than physical ones.
"Consumers want to have it, they don't want to be swapping out cards," he said. "Conversely, games like Smash Bros. 3DS, a game where consumers invest a lot of time mastering move sets and really becoming an expert with a particular character. While it would never happen, the consumer is afraid they're going to lose the data and so it's in a physical form because they feel more secure having the card."
The end result is that a game like Smash Bros. has a lower than average digital sales ratio.
"I do think that consumers find a sense of security in having the physical thing, and given that, I think the option of the physical thing always needs to be there. How that manifests itself in our future development we'll see. But it is an observation based on sales whether it's on our 3DS or Wii U, the wide range of digital sales is pretty striking."
Oh C'mon, Terrell. I know that their finances have improved. The point, as you well know, was that Nintendo are in a position where they need to be very financially conservative these days. Even more so than their usual, which was already quite conservative. They are not making the "Nintendo-like profits" that they strive for, and until they are, neither their management nor their investors will be satisfied. Our disagreement is on how they get there.For someone who wants hard numbers, throwing out that Nintendo is "barely breaking even" doesn't exactly line up. Surely they have a few more years in the positive to make up for the losses in prior years, but this year is on track to make a significantly larger amount of money over last FY's great performance (considering the first 2 quarters of that year were a loss and they still posted a FY profit), as they have shown YoY improvement in their quarterly reports and will only improve more thanks to their strong holiday sales performance in Japan.
I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask for a little bit more than just your work history. Even a personal anecdote could shed some light on the subject for many of us, I am sure. In my experience, Nintendo cannot even manage to fill up the shelves which they are still holding on to at retail. There are still Wii and DS games on there as well as multiple slots for the same game (and they're not filled to the back). Hopefully, NX marks a huge turnaround for this, but that may be wishful thinking, especially if their focus is on more indie and mobile type digital software.But to the point.. until Nintendo, or any publisher for that matter, opens their books completely to the public, you're never going to get "hard numbers" for either side of this argument. You can quote DRAMExchange all you want, but that's not a "hard number", as they're market analysis estimates. Just like my 3 years in corporate procurement and background in supply chain management is an estimation of how even packing something ever-so-slightly differently and/or maximizing shelf space can save or cost you huge amounts of cash, a sentiment that anyone who does supply chain management will agree with. So we either take both at face value, or we take neither. That decision is up to you.
Very interesting report by @gibbogame: Nintendo's NX may work with smartphones, PCs and even rival consoles such as PlayStation4.
By going third party?Yup, they're going at it with the motto "go big or go home". I like it.
Bruh I just retweeted that what the fuck is going on?
Its not out yet is it?I don't see much of a report?
Huh. What the hell is the NX. Gotta be the most confusing console rumors ever. Lol
Bruh I just retweeted that what the fuck is going on?
Maybe it's a handheld that can stream content from a wide variety of devices? Like a fucking super Wii U gamepad? That seems completely insane. Also potentially amazing. But how does that fit with reports of it being a home console and the now infamous "industry leading chips?"
I really want to see this report.
Huh. What the hell is the NX. Gotta be the most confusing console rumors ever. Lol
Its not out yet is it?
Gibbogame, the one he linked attends and reports Nintendo news all the time he usually is the guy to follow for live translations of information being digested at investor meetings, fiscal year meetings or whatever.Oh. Though I also have no idea who the person he's linking to is or what they would know or how they would know it.
Of course, an app that works on smart phones, pcs, and even competing consoles like the PS4 doesn't actually mean much.