gutter_trash
Banned
any other credible news sites reporting on this?
Sure, but the problem seems to be that they are threatening these ridiculous times to bully peaceful protesters also. If someone was arrested and they have proof they were destroying things, of course that should be punished.That article completely fails to mention the violent rampage that occurred that destroyed stores, cars were set on fire, a lot of people got rocks thrown at them, and six cops were injured. Is 75 years penalty harsh for inciting and participating in riots? Maybe. Was everyone charged involved in the violence? Probably not, but thats what trials are for.
Everyone involved was NOT peaceful. There was plenty of violence and damage. You can see pictures and stuff here:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ts-expected-trump-becomes-president/96788208/
If I'm at a protest, and I see people start breaking things and setting stuff on fire...
I'm out of there before the cops have time to react and arrest anyone.
It's not a protest any longer, it's a riot.
That article completely fails to mention the violent rampage that occurred that destroyed stores, cars were set on fire, a lot of people got rocks thrown at them, and six cops were injured. Is 75 years penalty harsh for inciting and participating in riots? Maybe. Was everyone charged involved in the violence? Probably not, but thats what trials are for.
Everyone involved was NOT peaceful. There was plenty of violence and damage. You can see pictures and stuff here:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ts-expected-trump-becomes-president/96788208/
Basically. Article's content is gross, thread is gross.That violence and destruction... good lord. That is at least a decade in jail. There were literal broken windows.
Good job, police!
Haha. Dude seriously. The article literally says that they encircled these people. Once you're in the middle of that kind of shit, it's really hard to get out. Have you ever been at a public (standing) concert or found yourself in a mosh pit? Multiply that several times. Even if you want out, you might well be stuck.
It'd be great if while you were on your way out you were arrested and charged 75 years.I remember watching on inauguration day wall to wall news coverage. It didn't look that crowded at the area where things were set on fire and windows smashed and the cops waited a while before moving in.
Nope, I would have been so far away from there the second the first window was smashed.
"oh wait, it's that kind of protest? Nope. I'm out."
I don't think the author's definition of civil disobedience and the generally-accepted definition match.
I highly doubt they would, given these people were protesting the legal transfer of power to a democratically elected president.
That article completely fails to mention the violent rampage that occurred that destroyed stores, cars were set on fire, a lot of people got rocks thrown at them, and six cops were injured. Is 75 years penalty harsh for inciting and participating in riots? Maybe. Was everyone charged involved in the violence? Probably not, but thats what trials are for.
Everyone involved was NOT peaceful. There was plenty of violence and damage. You can see pictures and stuff here:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ts-expected-trump-becomes-president/96788208/
Thank you for being a voice of reason^ this
Let's not pretend it was all sign holding and slogan chanting on inauguration day 2017.
If I'm at a protest, and I see people start breaking things and setting stuff on fire...
I'm out of there before the cops have time to react and arrest anyone.
It's not a protest any longer, it's a riot.
LolThank you for being a voice of reason
If I'm at a protest, and I see people start breaking things and setting stuff on fire...
I'm out of there before the cops have time to react and arrest anyone.
It's not a protest any longer, it's a riot.
This worship of property is so fucking pathetic. Who gives a fuck about some windows?
But every thread about protests has been utterly ridiculous so why should this one be any different.
Yeah you're right. Shoot the cops doing their jobs, then shoot the MPs, fuck It just shoot everyone. Justice can only be found at the business end of a rifle.I've said it before and I'll say it again:
This is EXACTLY why you have second amendment rights: to rise up against a state that no longer serves the people.
BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
Responsible business owners for one, especially if they had nothing to do with what's happening. Not talking about this one instance per se, but it's beyond ridiculous to smash windows of your town's local businesses during a riot when that business wasn't part of the problemThis worship of property is so fucking pathetic. Who gives a fuck about some windows?
But every thread about protests has been utterly ridiculous so why should this one be any different.
If I'm at a protest, and I see people start breaking things and setting stuff on fire...
I'm out of there before the cops have time to react and arrest anyone.
It's not a protest any longer, it's a riot.
I don't think the author's definition of civil disobedience and the generally-accepted definition match.
I highly doubt they would, given these people were protesting the legal transfer of power to a democratically elected president.
I've said it before and I'll say it again:
This is EXACTLY why you have second amendment rights: to rise up against a state that no longer serves the people.
BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
Let's not pretend that randomly destroying unrelated property does anything to further, or legitimize the cause.This worship of property is so fucking pathetic. Who gives a fuck about some windows?
But every thread about protests has been utterly ridiculous so why should this one be any different.
I'm sure if they calmly explain that to the police they'll understand and let them goAnd if you don't see it but still get arrested?...
Insurance exists.Responsible business owners for one, especially if they had nothing to do with what's happening. Not talking about this one instance per se, but it's beyond ridiculous to smash windows of your town's local businesses during a riot when that business wasn't part of the problem
Yeah you're right. Shoot the cops doing their jobs, then shoot the MPs, fuck It just shoot everyone. Justice can only be found at the business end of a rifle.
Do you know who you sound like right now?
Is 75 years penalty harsh for inciting and participating in riots? Maybe.
It's a fairly recent law, actually, that Obama signed and supported: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_..._obama_is_a_quiet_attack_on_free_speech_.html
Not for real. As the article dictates, its a scare tactic and after the lawyers are done they'll probably only get a couple years, decade max.
Pres. Obama is a con man. It's not surprising that he played his most fervent supporters yet again.
Homeowners, minority victims of fraud, his own people's civil liberties, and the list goes on. His people claim the country is going down the tubes. Yet Pres. Obama is living the life and is making bank since leaving office. His actions should be unacceptable and publicly shamed but his people put up with virtually anything their team does.
Nobody claimed that, so ...Let's not pretend that randomly destroying unrelated property does anything to further, or legitimize the cause.
When Obama was president, republicans were screaming "2nd amendment!" and we were decrying them as gross. Now that the other team is in the white house its suddenly ok? Be better.I'm not sure how things will look in the next couple of days here in Hamburg during G20, but I'm sure no one will face 10 years jail time, not even with a riot.
Quite a few people from Texas? Trump? Trump supporters? The NRA? Too many options, enlighten me, please!
That article completely fails to mention the violent rampage that occurred that destroyed stores, cars were set on fire, a lot of people got rocks thrown at them, and six cops were injured. Is 75 years penalty harsh for inciting and participating in riots? Maybe. Was everyone charged involved in the violence? Probably not, but thats what trials are for.
Everyone involved was NOT peaceful. There was plenty of violence and damage. You can see pictures and stuff here:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ts-expected-trump-becomes-president/96788208/
^ this
Let's not pretend it was all sign holding and slogan chanting on inauguration day 2017.
Thank you.
Yeah, this article really kind of sucks.
Not for real. As the article dictates, its a scare tactic and after the lawyers are done they'll probably only get a couple years, decade max.
Great to know that many liberals care more about a couple windows than the futures of 200 people
There's a whole other side of this story that is absent here. Or rather a lot of information left out.
Great to know that many liberals care more about a couple windows than the futures of 200 people
Nobody claimed that, so ...
Because we have a fascist for President.
These protestors are some of the most courageous ones resisting Trump.
Resistance without teeth behind it is just noise that politicians can pander to or ignore without consequences.
Rule of law is not always just and fighting back against injustice should always be commended even if it goes against the law.
Oh please. It is heavily implied by many.
There is a strong violence/riot defense force here on gaf. When directly asked they say they are against violence, but when it occurs they don't condemn it and spew some BS about how all change involves violence... as if that justifies anything.
You could dig in your heels in response to those calling you out, as it looks like you made your line in sand pretty clearly. Or you could recognize the injustice and very public rhetoric Trump and the GOP have leveled against protesters.Also no. Did anyone actually read the article? Same thing happened in NY. ACLU fought it there, and now they're fighting it here too. All of these people still have court cases and trials. If this was Orwellian they would've just shot them in the streets. Its not though, so the best Trump's cronies can do is scare them with a big sentence that will get heavily pared down. Fuck me for not thinking the sky's falling I guess.
Edit: reading Fuchsdh's post, seems they weren't arrested for peaceful protest, they were arrested for smashing shit and fighting cops. I thought it was fishy that he whined about the women's march as ineffective.
Why don't you burn your belongings in protest of capitalism/taxes/etc then, if it's so pathetic to want to protect the things you own?This worship of property is so fucking pathetic. Who gives a fuck about some windows?
But every thread about protests has been utterly ridiculous so why should this one be any different.