killatopak
Gold Member
Disgusting.
Bullshit answer. Doesn't make the act any less wrong or illegalInsurance exists.
This worship of property is so fucking pathetic. Who gives a fuck about some windows?
But every thread about protests has been utterly ridiculous so why should this one be any different.
I'm shocked you don't know what you wrote. Not shocked you haven't read my repeated comments about how overcharging to generate plea bargains is a huge problem.I'm absolutely shocked that you got that out of my post.
Shocked.
Perhaps, just perhaps, and don't think I'm crazy here, we not have absurd potential penalties for relatively inoffensive shit?
I'm shocked you don't know what you wrote. Not shocked you haven't read my repeated comments about how overcharging to generate plea bargains is a huge problem.
If they didn't burn a car or throw a rock or swing a pipe, and the state can't prove it, toss the case, or don't take a plea and force the state to prove it. Not complicated.
I know. It's hard to believe that anyone would defend the destruction of innocent peoples property, but.. Here we are.
Uh-huh.
Certain memories of the day of my arrest stand most vividly in my mind: zip-ties cutting into my wrist and the taste of pepper spray; losing count of the roaches that crawled over me in my sleep; the constant horror of not knowing where my partner was.
YouTube has a zillion videos.[Citation needed]
Sure. Hurting and attempting to murder people to force your political ideology isn't terrorism. Nope. Just another case of mentally ill protesters! Nothing to see here!Yeah.
This is how police states function.
You don't just get to throw people in prison for potentially maybe being associated with a group. A group, btw, that no matter how hard you spin and try too still isn't a bloody terror group. Protests become disorganized and people glom on to groups they dont even know anything about and are then thrown in a paddy wagon beaten and bloodied because the police open fire on them.
You didn't say those were the things the business owners you invoked were concerned with. I assumed it was money, which insurance covers.Bullshit answer. Doesn't make the act any less wrong or illegal
Sure. Hurting and attempting to murder people to force your political ideology isn't terrorism. Nope. Just another case of mentally ill protesters! Nothing to see here!
And, yes, if you run with a group and cover your face, dress in uniform with the sole purpose of obscuring your identity so nobody knows exactly where those explosives came from and refuse to give up names, you are an accomplice. You don't have to commit an act to be charged with a crime, you just have to help hide it. And if you watch some interviews with Antifa geoups, they don't give anyone up or even criticise or speak out against the attacks when asked to. Their silence shows support. That's not a police state, that's them being an accomplice. I have zero symapthy for anyone who sympathizes with terrorist organizations. None.
I don't think the author's definition of civil disobedience and the generally-accepted definition match.
I highly doubt they would, given these people were protesting the legal transfer of power to a democratically elected president.
You are promoting collective punishment and arguing against due process while citing Tim Pool who is sympathetic to 4chan alt-righters, Sovereign Citizens, 3%'ers, Oath Keepers, etc. Groups whose members or ideological subscribers have committed acts of terrorism against black people, Muslims, LBGT groups, abortion doctors and more. Who show up to political protests armed with loaded weapons and military gear arguably with the sole intent of intimidation. Should Tim Pool go to jail for covering these groups? Should these groups publicly apologize when members, or those with similar political ideologies, commit acts of violence or terrorism?
YouTube has a zillion videos.
Tim Pool'a channel has about 6 straight hours of streaming of one of the protests. It's been well documented by not-mainstream-media and no, not Fox.
You'll find them on independent journalist networks, mostly left leaning, just not in not in the public eye.
Sure. Hurting and attempting to murder people to force your political ideology isn't terrorism. Nope. Just another case of mentally ill protesters! Nothing to see here!
And, yes, if you run with a group and cover your face, dress in uniform with the sole purpose of obscuring your identity so nobody knows exactly where those explosives came from and refuse to give up names, you are an accomplice. You don't have to commit an act to be charged with a crime, you just have to help hide it. And if you watch some interviews with Antifa geoups, they don't give anyone up or even criticise or speak out against the attacks when asked to. Their silence shows support. That's not a police state, that's them being an accomplice. I have zero symapthy for anyone who sympathizes with terrorist organizations. None.
You're free to cause as much havoc as you can a I guess, just don't complain that there are consequences to your actions.
YouTube has a zillion videos.
Tim Pool'a.
"only"Not for real. As the article dictates, its a scare tactic and after the lawyers are done they'll probably only get a couple years, decade max.
I'm pretty sure the same dude who had a breakdown in another thread about how the left is pushing him away with their tactics or something lolAnnnd I stopped reading.
Whose man is this?
You forgot1. Arrest large groups of protesters indiscriminately, with boilerplate affidavits (individualized probable cause? No, lol!), regardless of if they were "rioting" or merely in the general vicinity those legitimately rioting.
2. File ridiculous initial charges against everyone (also uniformly and indiscriminately since they used the same boilerplate affidavit).
3. Force the legitimate protesters (i.e., not the rioters) to spend time, money, and incur stress to fight the charges (and, of course, there is always a possibility of a guilty verdict in a trial, regardless of level of actual involvement).
4. Oh yeah, and you also have an arrest on your record now. So, even if you fight the charges and are found not guilty, you have to worry about that impact on your professional and personal life.
5. Other citizens see the above and think to themselves, "I'll never join a protest now. It doesn't seem worth it regardless of the circumstances or cause." Thus, constitutionally-protected rights are chilled.
This is a page right out of the fascists' playbook.
Personally, if I'm the judge, I'm granting motions to dismiss left and right unless there is some level of individualized probable cause against the accused. Because, otherwise, this is a gross overreach and abuse of authority by law enforcement.
That's where you're wrong, kiddo. And there's no doubt that Antifa's recent actions will cause more states to do the same.Yeah.
A group, btw, that no matter how hard you spin and try too still isn't a bloody terror group.
Did you read that entry? Be honest.That's where you're wrong, kiddo. And there's no doubt that Antifa's recent actions will cause more states to do the same.
Agreed (with all your posts ITT).People in here defending a mandatory decade long prison sentence for broken windows scare the crap out of me.
I highly doubt they would, given these people were protesting the legal transfer of power to a democratically elected president.
I've only ever seen jobs all if you were convicted of anything. An arrest without a conviction won't affect professional lives that much if at all4. Oh yeah, and you also have an arrest on your record now. So, even if you fight the charges and are found not guilty, you have to worry about that impact on your professional and personal life.
I'm glad I don't have to live in the USA.Not for real. As the article dictates, its a scare tactic and after the lawyers are done they'll probably only get a couple years, decade max.
I'm glad I don't have to live in the USA.
seventy-five years threatened but they'll "only get a couple years, decade max." fucking fascist third world banana republic, get the fuck out of here with that shit
Yep. All this says to me is I should bring some real weapons and use them against the police. I mean, if your going to threaten me with life in prison for protesting, and I decide to protest, why would I even consider not going to actual war with you?This is a scary sentance.