Absolutely with the time. That is a HUGE advantage a home cook has. If you are really going for it with patience, time and technique you can definitely get to average restaurant quality food...and with some work...even higher up the scale. Average cooking is about following the recipe. Great cooking is about focusing on details, treating recipes as guidelines rather than gospel, accounting for conditions in your kitchen, and, of course, knowing how to properly execute each technique at multiple steps throughout the process (when to salt, when to use acid, all that stuff). You are building a meal...not just throwing something in a pan.True.
Unless someone is a pro cook with great gear at home, trying to beat high end restaurant quality food is going to be tough.
But it cant be that hard if someone knows what they are doing. My mom cooked great stuff at home, had zero training and made all the stuff in cheap ass pots and pans, and an oven tray to make roast beef that looked like it was 30 years old in a shitty oven. No doubt my mom's apple pie is better than any I've ever eaten, whether it's store bought or from a restaurant. When I go to friend's BBQs, some of them make great shit and they arent cooks either. Often better than any BBQ I've ate at a restaurant.
I'm no cook expert, but I'd say some of the stuff I make at home is just as good as many modest restaurants and I'm just making this shit with normal grocery store ingredients and common dude cookware and kitchen appliances. Zero training or commercial grade equipment in my house. The main pot I use to cook stuff I got from Canadian Tire for about $30.
The one key advantage people at home have is time. We can take 10 min to make something or sit there for an hour. Whereas restaurants have to churn out your dinner in lets say 20 minutes. So they got a time crunch. BUT, they also got better equipment, are trained and spent time prepping and defrosting stuff all morning.
Well, that's one way to pay off your ubereats order.People these days are only good at sucking d*ck.
Well, that's one way to pay off your ubereats order.
Just curious, when you say commerical grade do you mean high end consumer brands that cost a lot? (Like how when my bro bought a brand new house, the default kitchen stuff he got in his house were Wolf and Dacor. I have no idea how good this stuff is compared to mainstream brands except they cost like 3x the price.I have outfitted my kitchen with as much commercial grade stuff as a I can within reason. But really, it comes down to technique more than anything (unless you are really leaning into high end stuff that uses elements of molecular gastronomy and all that jazz).
Ya.Most restaurant food is prepared by unskilled kids following instructions. Exceeding that bar is surprisingly easy with minimal effort. Understanding how to manage a kitchen and plan meals is why people struggle to cook. Establishing a habit of eating at home is easier when one understands how to remove friction from the process.
My wife and I can prepare most meals within half an hour because our kitchen is always stocked with staples and the base ingredients for many dishes. We will spend a weekend afternoon making tomato sauce or bread which is frozen to be used over a month. Daily prep is usually vegetables or other simple prep. Eating out is mostly high end restaurants or stuff we can't cook at home (tandoor, prata, etc).
A little of both. I only live in an apartment, so I don't have control of my oven/stove (but its natural gas and strangely great for being just a normal ol'apartment). That said, I can push my apartment kitchen to its limit of what it can handle.Just curious, when you say commerical grade do you mean high end consumer brands that cost a lot? (Like how when my bro bought a brand new house, the default kitchen stuff he got in his house were Wolf and Dacor. I have no idea how good this stuff is compared to mainstream brands except they cost like 3x the price.
Or do you mean high end stuff that only restaurant owners would recognize?
This is exactly right. Building the correct kitchen with the right staples is such a key component. Cooking kinda sucks when you just have your recipe, go to the store, buy everything down to the salt and then go cook it. But when you can eyeball a recipe, know that you just need a few fresh things, and can freewheel the rest....Man...thats when it starts to get super fun. (Or better yet....start challenging yourself to only buy what's on sale and prep a meal out of it...thats when you know you are starting to break free of average cooking and actually developing skill).Most restaurant food is prepared by unskilled kids following instructions. Exceeding that bar is surprisingly easy with minimal effort. Understanding how to manage a kitchen and plan meals is why people struggle to cook. Establishing a habit of eating at home is easier when one understands how to remove friction from the process.
My wife and I can prepare most meals within half an hour because our kitchen is always stocked with staples and the base ingredients for many dishes. We will spend a weekend afternoon making tomato sauce or bread which is frozen to be used over a month. Daily prep is usually vegetables or other simple prep. Eating out is mostly high end restaurants or stuff we can't cook at home (tandoor, prata, etc).
You can do it that way. But you can also just defrost those chicken breasts in warm water (assuming that's what you are using), that takes about 15 minutes. Butter fly it. Sear it in a cast iron skillet (takes about 6 minutes), while your veggies are roasting in the oven at 425 for about 20 minutes. ...Can be eating a better meal (at least for my tastes) in half the time you are talking about. Just a suggestionYa.
Also saving time is following a schedule (or pathway) how to cook things and do errands concurrently.
For example, if I want chicken and veggies, I'll defrost meat overnight (sometimes two nights), marinade it up during that time or in the morning. When it's dinner time, throw the chicken in the oven or airfryer. Oven takes 50 minutes, airfryer 20 minutes. In the meantime, do all the other shit like cutting up and prepping veggies etc.... At the half way point, cook that stuff too.
If there's time leftover, you can also take a shower.
A big time waster is doing the reverse. Do all kinds of prep work, taking a shower, doing laundry..... and then start cooking the meat. That drags out the whole process.
A good time saver too (which I admit I dont do often) is make enough food for 2-3 meals so all you do is heat it up in the microwave or airfryer.
What are you talking about? Don't mess up this thread that is discussing the simple pleasures of cooking.Capitalism, social engineering, advertisement psychology.
Normalizing mindset of working upwards of 40 hours a week, often uncompensated. Nonexistent surplus of energy as a result.
Local government - funding.
Nah, Giada was pretty legit. And Sandra Lee's "Semi-home made" was a great show for integrting some prepared stuff into a cooked meal to save time. The last lady I don't think I"ve seen on a "how to cook" show but she sure is purdy as a cooking judge.Sponsored shit. Take any oriental recipe and see what you need to buy for the "authentic" experience. And I'm pretty sure those gals don't bother with the dishes.
They're kinda hot tho
Nah, Giada was pretty legit. And Sandra Lee's "Semi-home made" was a great show for integrting some prepared stuff into a cooked meal to save time. The last lady I don't think I"ve seen on a "how to cook" show but she sure is purdy as a cooking judge.
True, the sous chef chopping up all that shit they just casually throw into a pot or whatever is the secret sauce to all that cooking.Fair enough. Although I'm pretty confident those ingredients don't come out of their own pockets. Easy to make a well made meal full of ingredients most of us don't have laying around on the regular with a whole production team behind you. But perhaps I'm to cynical. Pleasing to the eye tho. I wonder why
True, the sous chef chopping up all that shit they just casually throw into a pot or whatever is the secret sauce to all that cooking.
"A bit of rosemary, some thyme, a pinch of freshly ground pepper, 3 pinches of chopped sage, a dash of lemon zest, the juice of a crushed artichoke heart, the blood of a virgin olive, and VIOLA a perfect sauce for duck!"
ME: "Fuck! Thats an HOUR of prep!"
A good compromise for my family were the "semi-prepared" meal services like Blue Apron, Home Fresh, etc. They often required some prep but you got all that exotic shit and the steps were pretty basic. If you are looking to break out of spaghetti and hamburger helper as the limit of your skills those services can actually help.Yeah that was my point.
Serves as a nice template but for most of us it's unrealistic.
I agree with this.One thing that also helps making cooking exciting are sauces.
Look closer, there’s a ceramic plate down below under the grates. It’s covered with meat drippings and char but you can’t see any hot coals below because of the plate.You charring that thing with direct heat???
Get the EGGconverter on there STAT for indirect cooking!
Yeah, could be. Thats definitely the way I'd do it, probably foil the breasteses a bit earlier to prevent some of that browning as well.Look closer, there’s a ceramic plate down below under the grates. It’s covered with meat drippings and char but you can’t see any hot coals below because of the plate.
..Its difficult to make stuff truly excellent (like high end restaurant grade). Anyone who says a blanket statement of "cooking is easy" is really missing it.
I know right? But it answers OP first question and is 'on topic' and true from my perspective.What are you talking about? Don't mess up this thread that is discussing the simple pleasures of cooking.
That is not the whole story. Id rather have a great cook with modest ingredients than an average cook with great ingredients. Of course your fine dining has both.All about the ingredients. Good restaurants pick the good stuff. Good cooks are actually good shoppers.
Well, Im going to ignore that word salad so we can find common ground on the joy of cooking!I know right? But it answers OP first question and is 'on topic' and true from my perspective.
To answer your request though - personally, I most enjoy the chemistry aspect of cooking. I think I'd be a better food chemist than chef.
I lack something of a patience with cooking consistently. Always screw up ramen i.e by getting bored half way through and half assing it. But I make killer hen fricassee once every blue moon..Well, Im going to ignore that word salad so we can find common ground on the joy of cooking!
You are absolutely right about the science behind all of it. On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen, is a great food science resource if you ever decide to look more into it and scratch your chemist itch.
Pfffft. You don't need that to fall in love with cooking. Just these two:
Maybe sprinkle some younger (though still MILF) Nigella Lawson in.
With great ingredients you just have to be competent and not ruin the process. So an average cook is all you need.That is not the whole story. Id rather have a great cook with modest ingredients than an average cook with great ingredients. Of course your fine dining has both.
You clearly don’t understand how technique in the kitchen works. An “average” cook doesn’t have these. So, no. A great cook with modest ingredients will cook a better meal than an average cook with great ingredients….With great ingredients you just have to be competent and not ruin the process. So an average cook is all you need.
Well, full blown ramen is intense! Instant, you should be ashamedI lack something of a patience with cooking consistently. Always screw up ramen i.e by getting bored half way through and half assing it. But I make killer hen fricassee once every blue moon..
I'm an average cook. And go to expensive restaurants. I match them pretty closely if I can match their ingredients. The only real difference is restaurants have a bigger material preparation scale, If I went into their kitchen and used their stuff I would produce close results.You clearly don’t understand how technique in the kitchen works. An “average” cook doesn’t have these. So, no. A great cook with modest ingredients will cook a better meal than an average cook with great ingredients….
I mean....are you sure you are going to places with great chefs?I'm an average cook. And go to expensive restaurants. I match them pretty closely if I can match their ingredients. The only real difference is restaurants have a bigger material preparation scale, If I went into their kitchen and used their stuff I would produce close results.
Cooking is not that hard, the chefs are great because of the discipline and preparation, the actual cooking is the easy part.I mean....are you sure you are going to places with great chefs?
My experience is opposite of yours. Fair enough. I'm a well above average cook, and can see how much I don't know when I see truly great chefs cook. You can say its ingredients all you want...but thats only part of the story. For me. I will say it again. Give me a great cook with average ingredients over an average cook with great ingredients any day of the week.
Its amazing how you are down playing the skill of great chefs to only the sum of their ingredients. You are wrong.